Effectiveness of active flow control for turbulent skin friction drag reduction

The effectiveness of the opposition control method proposed by Choi et al. [J. Fluid Mech. 262, 75 (1994)] has been studied using direct numerical simulations. In this study, the effects of the amplitude and the phase of wall blowing and suction control input were considered separately. It is found that the amplitude of wall blowing and suction as well as the detection plane location played an important role in active control for skin-friction drag reduction. By changing the amplitude, a substantial drag reduction was achieved for all detection plane locations considered, and the efficiency of the opposition control was also improved. When the control was effective, the drag reduction was proportional to the wall blowing and suction strength. There existed a maximum wall blowing and suction strength, beyond which the opposition control became less effective or even unstable. Turbulence characteristics affected by various wall blowing and suction parameters were analyzed to understand the underlying mechanisms for drag reduction. The wall-normal velocity and vorticity fluctuations showed a strong correlation with drag reduction. © 2011 American Institute of Physics

[1]  Sangmo Kang,et al.  Active wall motions for skin-friction drag reduction , 2000 .

[2]  Nobuhide Kasagi,et al.  Progress in direct numerical simulation of turbulent transport and its control , 1998 .

[3]  Parviz Moin,et al.  On the relation of near‐wall streamwise vortices to wall skin friction in turbulent boundary layers , 1993 .

[4]  Yongmann M. Chung Unsteady turbulent flow with sudden pressure gradient changes , 2005 .

[5]  J. B. Perot,et al.  An analysis of the fractional step method , 1993 .

[6]  Srinivas Ramakrishnan,et al.  Viscous effects in control of near-wall turbulence , 2002 .

[7]  R. Goodman,et al.  Application of neural networks to turbulence control for drag reduction , 1997 .

[8]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Flow Control: Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management , 2000 .

[9]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak Flow Control: Contents , 2000 .

[10]  Kwing-So Choi,et al.  A wind-tunnel experiment on real-time opposition control of turbulence , 2006 .

[11]  S. K. Robinson,et al.  Coherent Motions in the Turbulent Boundary Layer , 1991 .

[12]  Nobuhide Kasagi,et al.  FEEDBACK CONTROL OF WALL TURBULENCE WITH WALL DEFORMATION , 2000, Proceeding of First Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.

[13]  Kwing-So Choi,et al.  Opposition control of near-wall turbulence with a piston-type actuator , 2001 .

[14]  Haecheon Choi,et al.  Effect of a localized time-periodic wall motion on a turbulent boundary layer flow , 2003 .

[15]  Peter W. Carpenter,et al.  Modifications to a Turbulent Inflow Generation Method for Boundary-Layer Flows , 2011 .

[16]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  MICRO-ELECTRO-MECHANICAL-SYSTEMS (MEMS) AND FLUID FLOWS , 1998 .

[17]  J. Kim,et al.  Suboptimal control of turbulent channel flow for drag reduction , 1998 .

[18]  Koji Fukagata,et al.  Microelectromechanical Systems–Based Feedback Control of Turbulence for Skin Friction Reduction , 2009 .

[19]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  VORTICITY FLUX CONTROL FOR A TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW , 1999 .

[20]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak Flow Control: Flow Control , 2000 .

[21]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Observed mechanisms for turbulence attenuation and enhancement in opposition-controlled wall-bounded flows , 1998 .

[22]  Heribert Bieler,et al.  Flow Control for Aircraft Performance Enhancements - Overview of Airbus - University cooperation - , 2006 .

[24]  Roger Temam,et al.  DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  P. Moin,et al.  Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  P. Moin,et al.  Reynolds-stress and dissipation-rate budgets in a turbulent channel flow , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  John L. Lumley,et al.  Active control in the turbulent wall layer of a minimal flow unit , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  Response of a spatially developing turbulent boundary layer to active control strategies in the framework of opposition control , 2007 .

[29]  Nobuhide Kasagi,et al.  Reynolds Number Effect on Wall Turbulence: Toward Effective Feedback Control , 2002 .

[30]  Jinhee Jeong,et al.  On the identification of a vortex , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[31]  Lennart Löfdahl,et al.  MEMS applications in turbulence and flow control , 1999 .

[32]  P. Moin,et al.  Effects of the Computational Time Step on Numerical Solutions of Turbulent Flow , 1994 .

[33]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.