The flexible pavement performance predictions of a deterioration model proposed by Small, Winston, and Evans are compared with those estimated from a deterioration model developed for Ontario conditions. The proposed model by Small et al., incorporating even a very modest rate of annual environmentally induced degradation, severely underestimates the initial service lives of Ontario pavements. The life-cycle cost characteristics of Ontario pavements are illustrated, and it is concluded that the optimal pavement strategy is insensitive to changes in the initial pavement thickness. This conclusion is in contrast to the "underbuilt" conclusions by Small et al. Typical average and marginal cost functions that must form the basis of any rational axle weight-based road user charge system are also presented.
[1]
Michael T. Mcnerney,et al.
COMPARISON AND REANALYSIS OF AASHO ROAD TEST RIGID PAVEMENT DATA
,
1991
.
[2]
B G Hutchinson,et al.
COST ALLOCATION IMPLICATIONS OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DETERIORATION MODELS
,
1989
.
[3]
Kenneth A. Small,et al.
OPTIMAL HIGHWAY DURABILITY
,
1985
.
[4]
B G Hutchinson,et al.
LEF ESTIMATION FROM CANROAD PAVEMENT LOAD-DEFLECTION DATA
,
1988
.
[5]
C. Winston,et al.
Road Work: A New Highway Pricing and Investment Policy
,
1989
.
[6]
William D. O. Paterson.
Road Deterioration and Maintenance Effects: Models for Planning and Management
,
1988
.