Increasing consumers' attention capture and food choice through bottom-up effects

To guide consumers in their decision process, especially food products often carry labels indicating production method or nutritional content. However, past research shows that many labels are rarely attended to in the consumer's decision process. In order to enhance the effectiveness of such labels and to increase choice likelihood of labeled products, the label must capture attention. We address the question of how a single label on the product packaging can capture attention through bottom-up effects and increase choice through increased attention capture. To this end, we conducted a combined eye tracking and choice experiment manipulating the surface size and visual saliency - the two most important bottom-up effects on attention - of the Danish organic label across three food product categories. Results show a strong and significant increase in attention capture towards a larger and more visually salient label. Most importantly, the effect of attention capture carried over into increased choice likelihood. Both marketers and policy makers might benefit from this approach, which provides directions for designing product labels that can influence attention capture and product choice.

[1]  C. Koch,et al.  Relative visual saliency differences induce sizable bias in consumer choice , 2012 .

[2]  J. Roosen,et al.  Visual Attention and Choice: A Behavioral Economics Perspective on Food Decisions , 2015 .

[3]  A. Krystallis,et al.  Organic consumers’ personal values research: Testing and validating the list of values (LOV) scale and implementing a value-based segmentation task , 2005 .

[4]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Attention and selection in online choice tasks , 2012, UMAP.

[5]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  G. Harper,et al.  Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare , 2002 .

[7]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries , 2010, Journal of Public Health.

[8]  Iván Lidón,et al.  The identification of viewing patterns of chocolate snack packages using eye-tracking techniques , 2015 .

[9]  Lucía Antúnez,et al.  How do design features influence consumer attention when looking for nutritional information on food labels? Results from an eye-tracking study on pan bread labels , 2013, International journal of food sciences and nutrition.

[10]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Health motivation and product design determine consumers’ visual attention to nutrition information on food products , 2010, Public Health Nutrition.

[11]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers’ choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking , 2014, Appetite.

[12]  C. Koch,et al.  Simultaneous modeling of visual saliency and value computation improves predictions of economic choice , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Standing out in the crowd: The effect of information clutter on consumer attention for front-of-pack nutrition labels , 2013 .

[14]  K. Grunert,et al.  Sustainability Labels on Food Products: Consumer Motivation, Understanding and Use , 2014 .

[15]  Jordan Zlatev,et al.  Assessing Information on Food Packages , 2017 .

[16]  Jacob L. Orquin,et al.  Eye Tracking and Nutrition Label Use: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Label Enhancement , 2012 .

[17]  M. Cecchini,et al.  Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized studies , 2016, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[18]  Shilpa S. Samant,et al.  Effects of label understanding level on consumers’ visual attention toward sustainability and process-related label claims found on chicken meat products , 2016 .

[19]  Svetlana Bialkova,et al.  An efficient methodology for assessing attention to and effect of nutrition information displayed front-of-pack , 2011 .

[20]  Robert Gaschler,et al.  Change detection for new food labels. , 2010 .

[21]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[22]  K. M. Sønderskov,et al.  The state and consumer confidence in eco-labeling: organic labeling in Denmark, Sweden, The United Kingdom and The United States , 2011 .

[23]  Jacob L. Orquin,et al.  A review of the findings and theories on surface size effects on visual attention , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[24]  Charles Spence,et al.  Using combined eye tracking and word association in order to assess novel packaging solutions: A case study involving jam jars , 2013 .

[25]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Klaus G Grunert,et al.  The perceived healthiness of functional foods A conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumers' perception of functional foods , 2003, Appetite.

[27]  Kenneth Holmqvist,et al.  Threats to the validity of eye-movement research in psychology , 2018, Behavior research methods.

[28]  Jacob L. Orquin,et al.  Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[29]  Jacob L. Orquin,et al.  Effects of salience are both short- and long-lived. , 2015, Acta psychologica.

[30]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Influence of Interpretation Aids on Attentional Capture, Visual Processing, and Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels. , 2015, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[31]  Kenneth Holmqvist,et al.  Eye tracking: a comprehensive guide to methods and measures , 2011 .

[32]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[33]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Mindful judgment and decision making. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Do you like what you see? The role of first fixation and total fixation duration in consumer choice , 2015 .

[35]  R. Pieters,et al.  A Review of Eye-Tracking Research in Marketing , 2008 .

[36]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.

[37]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Eye tracking for visual marketing , 2008 .

[38]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Which front-of-pack nutrition label is the most efficient one? The results of an eye-tracker study , 2015 .

[39]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes , 2015 .

[40]  Svetlana Bialkova,et al.  What determines consumer attention to nutrition labels , 2010 .

[41]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Consumer Visual Processing of Food Labels: Results from an Eye‐Tracking Study , 2013 .

[42]  Martin Lingonblad,et al.  Looking is buying. How visual attention and choice are affected by consumer preferences and properties of the supermarket shelf , 2017, Appetite.

[43]  Lukas K. Danner,et al.  Make a choice! Visual attention and choice behaviour in multialternative food choice situations , 2016 .