Absorption prediction from physicochemical parameters.

Modern drug design not only focuses on the pharmacological activity of a compound but also considers its ability to be absorbed and to reach its site of action. The prediction of in vivo barrier permeabilities, particularly intestinal absorption and blood-brain barrier passage, are substantial concerns in the development of new drug compounds. For several decades, n-octanol-water partition coefficients dominated absorption prediction. In recent years, the basic physicochemical parameters describing both membrane permeability and lipophilicity have been established. This review provides an outline of some selected absorption-prediction models with emphasis on intestinal absorption.

[1]  P. Borst,et al.  Absence of the mdr1a P-Glycoprotein in mice affects tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone, digoxin, and cyclosporin A. , 1995, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[2]  P. Artursson,et al.  Correlation between oral drug absorption in humans and apparent drug permeability coefficients in human intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) cells. , 1991, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[3]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Molecular architecture of tight junctions. , 1998, Annual review of physiology.

[4]  K. Iseki,et al.  A general approach for the prediction of the intestinal absorption of drugs: regression analysis using the physicochemical properties and drug-membrane electrostatic interaction. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[5]  G Folkers,et al.  Review of theoretical passive drug absorption models: historical background, recent developments and limitations. , 1996, Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae.

[6]  N el Tayar,et al.  Percutaneous penetration of drugs: a quantitative structure-permeability relationship study. , 1991, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[7]  Harpreet S. Chadha,et al.  Molecular Factors Influencing Drug Transfer across the Blood‐Brain Barrier , 1997, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[8]  R Griffiths,et al.  Development of a new physicochemical model for brain penetration and its application to the design of centrally acting H2 receptor histamine antagonists. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[9]  E. Brekkan,et al.  Immobilized liposome and biomembrane partitioning chromatography of drugs for prediction of drug transport , 1998 .

[10]  Bernard Testa,et al.  Lipophilicity and hydrogen-bonding capacity of H1-antihistaminic agents in relation to their central sedative side-effects , 1994 .

[11]  C. Pidgeon,et al.  Immobilized-artificial-membrane chromatography: measurements of membrane partition coefficient and predicting drug membrane permeability. , 1996, Journal of chromatography. A.

[12]  M. Abraham,et al.  Algorithms for Skin Permeability Using Hydrogen Bond Descriptors: the Problem of Steroids * , 1997, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[13]  M. Kansy,et al.  Hydrogen-Bonding Capacity and Brain Penetration , 1992, Chimia (Basel).

[14]  Han van de Waterbeemd,et al.  Programs and Methods for Calculation of log P‐values , 1996 .

[15]  W. Nernst Verteilung eines Stoffes zwischen zwei Lösungsmitteln und zwischen Lösungsmittel und Dampfraum , 1891 .

[16]  A. Avdeef,et al.  pH-metric log P. II: Refinement of partition coefficients and ionization constants of multiprotic substances. , 1993, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[17]  Han van de Waterbeemd,et al.  Lipophilicity in drug action and toxicology , 1996 .

[18]  G Folkers,et al.  Estimation of permeability by passive diffusion through Caco-2 cell monolayers using the drugs' lipophilicity and molecular weight. , 1998, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[19]  Peter C. Jurs,et al.  Prediction of Human Intestinal Absorption of Drug Compounds from Molecular Structure , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[20]  A. Leo,et al.  Substituent constants for correlation analysis in chemistry and biology , 1979 .

[21]  G. Amidon,et al.  Absorption potential: estimating the fraction absorbed for orally administered compounds. , 1985, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[22]  Michael H. Abraham,et al.  The Factors that Influence Skin Penetration of Solutes * , 1995 .

[23]  K. Luthman,et al.  Caco-2 monolayers in experimental and theoretical predictions of drug transport , 1996 .

[24]  A. Ghose,et al.  Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three‐Dimensional Structure‐Directed Quantitative Structure‐Activity Relationships I. Partition Coefficients as a Measure of Hydrophobicity , 1986 .

[25]  Harpreet S. Chadha,et al.  Hydrogen bonding. 33. Factors that influence the distribution of solutes between blood and brain. , 1994, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.