A two-dimensional approach to performance evaluation for a large number of research institutions
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Fred Y. Ye. Two H-mixed Synthetic Indices for the Assessment of Research Performance , 2010 .
[2] Chun-Ting Zhang,et al. The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations , 2009, PloS one.
[3] Francisco Herrera,et al. q2-Index: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation based on the number and impact of papers in the Hirsch core , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[4] Ricardo Arencibia Jorge,et al. Applying successive H indices in the institutional evaluation: A case study , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[5] Angelos Hatzakis,et al. Assessing the impact of biomedical research in academic institutions of disparate sizes , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.
[6] András Schubert,et al. Successive h-indices , 2007, Scientometrics.
[7] Leo Egghe,et al. The Hirsch index and related impact measures , 2010, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[8] Francisco Herrera,et al. hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices , 2010, Scientometrics.
[9] Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al. A Comparative Analysis of the Application of H-index, G-index, and A-index in Institutional-Level Research Evaluation , 2010 .
[10] L. Egghe. An improvement of the h-index: the g-index , 2006 .
[11] Bihui Jin. The AR-index: complementing the h-index , 2007 .
[12] Ronald Rousseau,et al. New developments related to the Hirsch index , 2006 .
[13] Qiang Wu,et al. The w-index: A measure to assess scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[14] Claes Wohlin,et al. A new index for the citation curve of researchers , 2009, Scientometrics.
[15] R. Rousseau,et al. The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index , 2007 .
[16] Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al. Positioning research and innovation performance using shape centroids of h-core and h-tail , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[17] Francisco Herrera,et al. h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields , 2009, J. Informetrics.
[18] J. E. Hirsch,et al. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
[19] Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al. Ranking patent assignee performance by h-index and shape descriptors , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[20] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[21] Ronald Rousseau,et al. A discussion of Prathap's h2-index for institutional evaluation with an application in the field of HIV infection and therapy , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[22] Lutz Bornmann,et al. The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[23] M. Kosmulski. A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index , 2009 .
[24] Jean-François Molinari,et al. A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions , 2008, Scientometrics.
[25] Ronald Rousseau,et al. Probing the h-core: an investigation of the tail–core ratio for rank distributions , 2010, Scientometrics.
[26] Jean-François Molinari,et al. Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index , 2008, Scientometrics.
[27] L. Egghe,et al. Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.