Coupling Fine-Scale Root and Canopy Structure Using Ground-Based Remote Sensing

Ecosystem physical structure, defined by the quantity and spatial distribution of biomass, influences a range of ecosystem functions. Remote sensing tools permit the non-destructive characterization of canopy and root features, potentially providing opportunities to link above- and belowground structure at fine spatial resolution in functionally meaningful ways. To test this possibility, we employed ground-based portable canopy LiDAR (PCL) and ground penetrating radar (GPR) along co-located transects in forested sites spanning multiple stages of ecosystem development and, consequently, of structural complexity. We examined canopy and root structural data for coherence (i.e., correlation in the frequency of spatial variation) at multiple spatial scales ≤10 m within each site using wavelet analysis. Forest sites varied substantially in vertical canopy and root structure, with leaf area index and root mass more becoming even vertically as forests aged. In all sites, above- and belowground structure, characterized as mean maximum canopy height and root mass, exhibited significant coherence at a scale of 3.5–4 m, and results suggest that the scale of coherence may increase with stand age. Our findings demonstrate that canopy and root structure are linked at characteristic spatial scales, which provides the basis to optimize scales of observation. Our study highlights the potential, and limitations, for fusing LiDAR and radar technologies to quantitatively couple above- and belowground ecosystem structure.

[1]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Using Small-Footprint Discrete and Full-Waveform Airborne LiDAR Metrics to Estimate Total Biomass and Biomass Components in Subtropical Forests , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Ross Nelson,et al.  A Portable Airborne Laser System for Forest Inventory , 2003 .

[3]  W. Cropper,et al.  Ecosystem carbon stocks in Pinus palustris forests , 2014 .

[4]  Henry Lin,et al.  Application of ground penetrating radar for coarse root detection and quantification: a review , 2012, Plant and Soil.

[5]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  A fine-scale architectural model of trees to enhance LiDAR-derived measurements of forest canopy structure , 2012 .

[6]  K. V. Van Rees,et al.  Root distribution at various distances from clove trees growing in Indonesia , 2002, Plant and Soil.

[7]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Root Gap Dynamics in Lodgepole Pine Forest: Nitrogen Transformations in Gaps of Different Size , 1994 .

[8]  W. Cohen,et al.  Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA , 1999 .

[9]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  Use of a ground‐based scanning lidar for estimation of biophysical properties of western larch (Larix occidentalis) , 2007 .

[10]  F. Day,et al.  EFFECT OF ELEVATED CO 2 ON COARSE-ROOT BIOMASS IN FLORIDA SCRUB DETECTED BY GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR , 2007 .

[11]  G. Parker,et al.  Forest Canopy Stratification—Is It Useful? , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[12]  A. Prokushkin,et al.  Critical analysis of root : shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes , 2006 .

[13]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Canopy Structural Changes Following Widespread Mortality of Canopy Dominant Trees , 2013 .

[14]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Mapping Above- and Below-Ground Carbon Pools in Boreal Forests: The Case for Airborne Lidar , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  S. Goetz,et al.  Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest, USA , 2006 .

[16]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Disturbance and the resilience of coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling in a north temperate forest , 2011 .

[17]  B. Drake,et al.  Effect of elevated CO2 on coarse-root biomass in Florida scrub detected by ground-penetrating radar. , 2007, Ecology.

[18]  Hans Peter Schmid,et al.  Ecosystem‐atmosphere exchange of carbon dioxide over a mixed hardwood forest in northern lower Michigan , 2003 .

[19]  A. Watson,et al.  Structural root morphology and biomass of three age-classes of Pinus radiata. , 1990 .

[20]  J A Doolittle,et al.  Use of ground-penetrating radar to study tree roots in the southeastern United States. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[21]  James A. Doolittle,et al.  Utility of ground-penetrating radar as a root biomass survey tool in forest systems , 2003 .

[22]  David J. Harding,et al.  A portable LIDAR system for rapid determination of forest canopy structure , 2004 .

[23]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Carnegie Airborne Observatory-2: Increasing science data dimensionality via high-fidelity multi-sensor fusion , 2012 .

[24]  C. Gough,et al.  Disturbance, complexity, and succession of net ecosystem production in North America's temperate deciduous forests , 2016 .

[25]  Christian Wirth,et al.  Generic biomass functions for Norway spruce in Central Europe--a meta-analysis approach toward prediction and uncertainty estimation. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[26]  DEBRA P. C. PETERS,et al.  Long-Term and Large-Scale Perspectives on the Relationship between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning , 2003 .

[27]  C. Gough,et al.  Research Article: Soil respiration in upper Great Lakes old-growth forest ecosystems , 2017, BIOS.

[28]  C. Gonzalez-Benecke,et al.  Surface-based GPR underestimates below-stump root biomass , 2016, Plant and Soil.

[29]  L. Vesterdal,et al.  Losses of nitrate from gaps of different sizes in a managed beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest , 2005 .

[30]  G. Bohrer,et al.  The role of canopy structural complexity in wood net primary production of a maturing northern deciduous forest. , 2011, Ecology.

[31]  R. Monserud,et al.  A basal area increment model for individual trees growing in even- and uneven-aged forest stands in Austria , 1996 .

[32]  M. Lefsky,et al.  Forest carbon densities and uncertainties from Lidar, QuickBird, and field measurements in California , 2010 .

[33]  T. Harrington,et al.  Root, ground cover, and litterfall dynamics within canopy gaps in a slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) dominated forest , 1999 .

[34]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Mechanistic scaling of ecosystem function and dynamics in space and time: Ecosystem Demography model version 2 , 2009 .

[35]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[36]  T. Kuuluvainen,et al.  Response of fine roots to an experimental gap in a boreal Picea abies forest , 2003, Plant and Soil.

[37]  J. Cermak,et al.  Mapping tree root systems with ground-penetrating radar. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[38]  M. Battaglia,et al.  Allometric relationships for Eucalyptus nitens (Deane and Maiden) Maiden plantations , 1999, Trees.

[39]  C. Gough,et al.  The legacy of harvest and fire on ecosystem carbon storage in a north temperate forest , 2007 .

[40]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Coarse root distribution of a semi‐arid oak savanna estimated with ground penetrating radar , 2012 .

[41]  P. Reich,et al.  Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[42]  S. Carpenter,et al.  The US Long Term Ecological Research Program , 2003 .

[43]  Susan S. Hubbard,et al.  Quantifying and relating land-surface and subsurface variability in permafrost environments using LiDAR and surface geophysical datasets , 2012, Hydrogeology Journal.

[44]  J. Kirchner Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology , 2006 .

[45]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes , 2002 .

[46]  C. Gough,et al.  Wood net primary production resilience in an unmanaged forest transitioning from early to middle succession , 2010 .

[47]  Gil Bohrer,et al.  Sustained carbon uptake and storage following moderate disturbance in a Great Lakes forest. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[48]  E. Foufoula‐Georgiou,et al.  Wavelet analysis for geophysical applications , 1997 .

[49]  Kira A. Borden,et al.  Estimating coarse root biomass with ground penetrating radar in a tree-based intercropping system , 2014, Agroforestry Systems.

[50]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[51]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Evidence for biotic controls on topography and soil production , 2010 .

[52]  C. Barton,et al.  Detection of tree roots and determination of root diameters by ground penetrating radar under optimal conditions. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[53]  R. Ostertag BELOWGROUND EFFECTS OF CANOPY GAPS IN A TROPICAL WET FOREST , 1998 .

[54]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Spatial variability in tropical forest leaf area density from multireturn lidar and modeling , 2015 .

[55]  H. Schmid,et al.  Multi-year convergence of biometric and meteorological estimates of forest carbon storage , 2008 .

[56]  L. Vierling,et al.  Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling , 2008 .

[57]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  The canopy surface and stand development: assessing forest canopy structure and complexity with near-surface altimetry , 2004 .

[58]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Estimating plot-level tree structure in a deciduous forest by combining allometric equations, spatial wavelet analysis and airborne LiDAR , 2012 .

[59]  D. Phillips,et al.  Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. , 2001, Environmental and experimental botany.

[60]  P. Berliner,et al.  Rainfall interception and spatial distribution of throughfall in a pine forest planted in an arid zone , 2008 .

[61]  H. Schmid,et al.  Controls on Annual Forest Carbon Storage: Lessons from the Past and Predictions for the Future , 2008 .

[62]  Peter B Reich,et al.  Key canopy traits drive forest productivity , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  Aslak Grinsted,et al.  Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics Application of the Cross Wavelet Transform and Wavelet Coherence to Geophysical Time Series , 2022 .

[64]  E. B. Moser,et al.  Gaps in a gappy forest: plant resources, longleaf pine regeneration, and understory response to tree removal in longleaf pine savannas , 2001 .

[65]  R. Fahey,et al.  Quantifying canopy complexity and effects on productivity and resilience in late-successional hemlock-hardwood forests. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[66]  A. Mucciardi,et al.  Using Ground-Penetrating Radar to Detect Tree Roots and Estimate Biomass , 2012 .

[67]  H. Majdi,et al.  Stand age and fine root biomass, distribution and morphology in a Norway spruce chronosequence in southeast Norway. , 2008, Tree physiology.

[68]  J. Tallant,et al.  Changes in soil nitrogen cycling in a northern temperate forest ecosystem during succession , 2014, Biogeochemistry.

[69]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Maintaining high rates of carbon storage in old forests: A mechanism linking canopy structure to forest function , 2013 .