Understanding University Industry Technology Transfer: Relationship Management Approaches of Leading Universities in Europe And USA

The importance of university technology transfer has widely been brought to the center of attention over the last decades. Research and practice thereby often concentrate on issues related to patenting and licensing or entrepreneurship but abstract away from relationship- and network-focused initiatives. In this paper, we argue that efforts to systematically develop close, long-term collaboration partnerships - although complex and resource intensive - are likely to be more beneficial for both universities and industry in the long run. Drawing on data derived from interviews with technology transfer executives of 22 leading European and U.S. universities, we analyze and discuss well-established practices of network and relationship management and their possible impact on technology transfer success. Our findings indicate that dedicated relationship management approaches can yield a sustainable competitive advantage for universities. We thereby shift the focus away from transaction-orientation towards more forward-looking relationship-centric approaches and discuss their institutionalization in great detail.

[1]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer , 2005 .

[2]  J. March,et al.  Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable , 2016 .

[3]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[4]  Brendan Galbraith,et al.  Defining and improving technology transfer business and management processes in university innovation centres , 2005 .

[5]  J. Sheth,et al.  Relationship marketing in consumer markets: Antecedents and consequences , 1995 .

[6]  E. Mansfield.  Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[7]  D. Teece.  Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How , 1977 .

[8]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[9]  A. Lewin,et al.  The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[10]  David Bennett,et al.  University to business technology transfer—UK and USA comparisons , 2007 .

[11]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[12]  K. Reynolds,et al.  Customer benefits and company consequences of customer-salesperson relationships in retailing , 1999 .

[13]  E. Gummesson.  Relationship Marketing in the New Economy , 2002 .

[14]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[15]  Magnus Klofsten,et al.  Creating a bridge between university and industry in small European countries: the role of the Industrial Liaison Office , 1999 .

[16]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[17]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[18]  K. Prashant,et al.  Managing Strategic Alliances: What Do We Know Now, and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2009 .

[19]  B. RenÃ,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[20]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  How To Make Strategic Alliances Work , 2001 .

[21]  A. Gibb.  Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management: Can We Afford to Neglect Them in the Twenty-first Century Business School? , 1996 .

[22]  Robert S. Dooley,et al.  After the Ink Dries: The Interaction of Trust and Control in US-Based International Joint Ventures , 2002 .

[23]  Dovev Lavie.  The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[24]  C. Weston,et al.  Analyzing Interview Data: The Development and Evolution of a Coding System , 2001 .

[25]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques , 1994 .

[26]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function , 2002 .

[27]  M. Balconi,et al.  University–industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics , 2006 .

[28]  I. R. Pashby,et al.  Effective University - Industry Interaction: A Multi-case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects , 2002 .

[29]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Errata: Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[30]  T. Millman.  Global key account management and systems selling , 1996 .

[31]  M. Ibanescu,et al.  Using R&D Portfolio Management to Deal with Dynamic Risk , 2008 .

[32]  Veronica Wong,et al.  Intra-Firm Learning in Technology Transfer: A Study of Taiwanese Information Technology Firms , 1999 .

[33]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  The Impact of Technology Transfer Office Characteristics on University Invention Disclosure , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[34]  Cyril Tomkins,et al.  Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks , 2001 .

[35]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives , 2009, 0912.3100.

[36]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  The Antecedents and Performance Implications of Cooperative Exchange Norms , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Thomas H. Brush,et al.  Asset Specificity, Uncertainty and Relational Norms: An Examination of Coordination Costs in Collaborative Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[38]  P. Kale.  Managing strategic alliances: what do we know now, and where do we go from here? , 2010 .

[39]  A. Gillison,et al.  Research Partnerships , 2007 .

[40]  Randall Wright.  How to Get the Most From University Relationships , 2008 .

[41]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[43]  S. Haugland,et al.  Predicting and measuring alliance performance: a multidimensional analysis , 2008 .

[44]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[45]  Michael Reinhard,et al.  Wissens- und Technologietransfer in Deutschland - , 2001 .

[46]  A. Link,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage In Informal University Technology Transfer , 2007 .

[47]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[48]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[49]  A. Link,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices : An Exploratory Study # , 1999 .

[50]  J. Hagedoorn.  Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[51]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[52]  Antonio Capaldo.  Network Structure and Innovation: The Leveraging of a Dual Network as a Distinctive Relational Capability , 2006 .

[53]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[54]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1987 .

[55]  James D. Adams,et al.  Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[56]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test , 2002 .

[57]  G. Padula.  Enhancing the Innovation Performance of Firms by Balancing Cohesiveness and Bridging Ties , 2008 .

[58]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Value creation and success in strategic alliances:: alliancing skills and the role of alliance structure and systems , 2001 .

[59]  A. Payne,et al.  A Strategic Framework for Customer Relationship Management , 2005 .

[60]  L. Ryals,et al.  Key account planning: benefits, barriers and best practice , 2007 .

[61]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[62]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[63]  R. Staelin,et al.  A Customer Relationship Management Roadmap: What is Known, Potential Pitfalls, and Where to Go , 2005 .

[64]  Gina Colarelli O'Connor,et al.  Major Innovation as a Dynamic Capability: A Systems Approach* , 2008 .

[65]  Roberto Mazzoleni,et al.  How Do University Inventions Get into Practice ? , 2000 .

[66]  K. Provan,et al.  Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks , 2007 .

[67]  A. Salter,et al.  Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration , 2009 .

[68]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with' , 2003 .

[69]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures , 2004 .

[70]  Catherine P. Ailes,et al.  Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers , 2002 .

[71]  Shanthi Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Relationship Dynamics between University Research Centers and Industrial Firms: Their Impact on Technology Transfer Activities , 2001 .

[72]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[73]  C. Moorman,et al.  Strategic Firm Commitments and Rewards for Customer Relationship Management in Online Retailing , 2005 .

[74]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[75]  Sally Davenport,et al.  Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference , 1998 .

[76]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Institutionalization of University Research Centers: The Case of the National Cooperative Program in Infertility Research , 2006 .

[77]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[78]  C. Sáez,et al.  Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: an empirical study of Spanish firms , 2002 .

[79]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[80]  Lawrence A. Crosby,et al.  Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective: , 1990 .

[81]  David L. Deeds,et al.  An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology , 2000 .

[82]  T. Daim,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer , 2007 .

[83]  Richard N. Cardozo,et al.  Mapping the university technology transfer process , 1997 .

[84]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Understanding Relationship Marketing Outcomes , 2002 .

[85]  James A. Narus,et al.  A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships , 1990 .

[86]  Marco Sabbadin.  Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D , 2016 .

[87]  K. Rost.  The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation , 2011 .

[88]  James G. March,et al.  Crossroads---Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable , 1997 .

[89]  A. Tiwana.  Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity , 2008 .

[90]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[91]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[92]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[93]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Lessons learned about technology transfer , 2001 .

[94]  Melanie Schreiner,et al.  What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success , 2009 .

[95]  Robert W. Palmatier,et al.  Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[96]  John T. Scott,et al.  Barriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Universities: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program , 2000 .

[97]  Doris Schartinger,et al.  Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria , 2001 .

[98]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[99]  Bengt Johannisson,et al.  University Training for Entrepreneurship – An Action Frame of Reference ( article on European Journal of Engineering Education, 1998, reprint) , 1998 .

[100]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[101]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer–Seller Relationships: , 1997 .

[102]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[103]  B. Sampat.  Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh-Dole , 2006 .

[104]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[105]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[106]  Michael J. Lippitz,et al.  The Four Models of Corporate Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[107]  Catherine Pardo,et al.  Key account management in the business‐to‐business field: a French overview , 1999 .

[108]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[109]  Alexander Kaufmann,et al.  Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions , 2008 .