Golden Delicious apples were classified using parametric and non-parametric classifiers into three quality classes. The features used in classification of apples were hue angle (for colour), shape defect, circumference, firmness, weight, blush percentage (red natural spots on the surface of the apple), russet (natural netlike formation on the surface of an apple), bruise content and number of natural defects. Different feature sets including four, five and nine features were also tested to find out the best classifier and feature set combination for an optimal classification success. The effects of using different feature sets and classifiers on classification performance were investigated. The feature set including five features produced slightly better classification results in general compared to feature sets including four and nine features. When the classifiers were compared, it was determined that the multi-layer perceptron neural network produced the highest classification results (up to 90%) while 1-nearest-neighbour and 2-nearest-neighbour classifiers followed this classifier with an 81.11% classification success. The 3-nearest-neighbour and decision tree classifiers resulted in similar classification success (75.56%). The parametric plug-in decision rule classification resulted in the lowest classification success. Principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis techniques were applied on the training data with nine, five and four features to visualise the degree of separation of the three quality classes of apples. As a result of this application, some improvements were observed in separation of the three quality classes from using four input features to nine features especially using principal components although some overlaps still existed among the classes.
[1]
B. Upchurch,et al.
Pattern recognition models for spectral reflectance evaluation of apple blemishes
,
1998
.
[2]
Vincent Leemans,et al.
Regular ArticleAE—Automation and Emerging Technologies: On-line Fruit Grading according to their External Quality using Machine Vision
,
2002
.
[3]
Daniel E. Guyer,et al.
Apple Grading Using Fuzzy Logic
,
2003
.
[4]
Kalman Peleg,et al.
Classification of Tissue Culture Segments by Colour Machine Vision
,
1993
.
[5]
N. Kasabov,et al.
Linear and non-linear pattern recognition models for classification of fruit from visible–near infrared spectra
,
2000
.
[6]
Can Keşmir,et al.
Classification of Potato Varieties Using Isoelectrophoretic Focusing Patterns, Neural Nets, and Statistical Methods
,
1997
.
[7]
Federico Hahn,et al.
Spectral Detection and Neural Network Discrimination of Rhizopus Stolonifer Spores on Red Tomatoes
,
2004
.
[8]
X. Luo,et al.
COMPARISON OF STATISTICAL AND NEURAL NETWORK METHODS FOR CLASSIFYING CEREAL GRAINS USING MACHINE VISION
,
1999
.
[9]
James E. Simon,et al.
Fusion Classification Techniques for Fruit Quality
,
1995
.
[10]
Francesco Tortorella,et al.
Classification of food, beverages and perfumes by WO3 thin-film sensors array and pattern recognition techniques
,
2001
.