Spliceosomal mutations decouple 3′ splice site fidelity from cellular fitness

The fidelity of splice site selection is thought to be critical for proper gene expression and cellular fitness. In particular, proper recognition of 3′-splice site (3′SS) sequences by the spliceosome is a daunting task considering the low complexity of the 3′SS consensus sequence YAG. Here we show that inactivating the near-essential splicing factor Prp18p results in a global activation of alternative 3′SS, many of which harbor sequences that highly diverge from the YAG consensus, including some highly unusual non-AG 3′SS. We show that the role of Prp18p in 3′SS fidelity is promoted by physical interactions with the essential splicing factors Slu7p and Prp8p and synergized by the proofreading activity of the Prp22p helicase. Strikingly, structure-guided point mutations that disrupt Prp18p-Slu7p and Prp18p-Prp8p interactions mimic the loss of 3′SS fidelity without any impact on cellular growth, suggesting that accumulation of incorrectly spliced transcripts does not have a major deleterious effect on cellular viability. These results show that spliceosomes exhibit remarkably relaxed fidelity in the absence of Prp18p, and that new 3′SS sampling can be achieved genome-wide without a major negative impact on cellular fitness, a feature that could be used during evolution to explore new productive alternative splice sites.

[1]  O. Abdel-Wahab,et al.  Dysregulation and therapeutic targeting of RNA splicing in cancer , 2022, Nature Cancer.

[2]  G. Chanfreau,et al.  Protocol for High-Resolution Mapping of Splicing Products and Isoforms by RT-PCR Using Fluorescently Labeled Primers , 2020, STAR protocols.

[3]  K. Nagai,et al.  Structural basis for conformational equilibrium of the catalytic spliceosome , 2020, bioRxiv.

[4]  G. Sanguinetti,et al.  Transcription rate strongly affects splicing fidelity and cotranscriptionality in budding yeast , 2018, Genome research.

[5]  K. Nagai,et al.  Postcatalytic spliceosome structure reveals mechanism of 3′–splice site selection , 2017, Science.

[6]  Chuangye Yan,et al.  Structure of a yeast step II catalytically activated spliceosome , 2017, Science.

[7]  Max E. Wilkinson,et al.  Structure of a spliceosome remodelled for exon ligation , 2017, Nature.

[8]  G. Chanfreau,et al.  Common genomic elements promote transcriptional and DNA replication roadblocks , 2016, Genome research.

[9]  Eric T. Wang,et al.  Identification of new branch points and unconventional introns in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2016, RNA.

[10]  G. Chanfreau,et al.  Splicing-Mediated Autoregulation Modulates Rpl22p Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2016, PLoS genetics.

[11]  N. Walter,et al.  Spliceosomal DEAH-Box ATPases Remodel Pre-mRNA to Activate Alternative Splice Sites , 2016, Cell.

[12]  R. Zimmer,et al.  Alternative Splicing in Next Generation Sequencing Data of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2015, PLoS ONE.

[13]  J. Beggs,et al.  Cwc21p promotes the second step conformation of the spliceosome and modulates 3′ splice site selection , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  G. Chanfreau,et al.  Stress-Induced Nuclear RNA Degradation Pathways Regulate Yeast Bromodomain Factor 2 to Promote Cell Survival , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[15]  M. Pellegrini,et al.  Widespread Use of Non-productive Alternative Splice Sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[16]  J. Enderlein,et al.  Molecular dissection of step 2 catalysis of yeast pre-mRNA splicing investigated in a purified system , 2013, RNA.

[17]  Thomas R. Gingeras,et al.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner , 2013, Bioinform..

[18]  Pedro G. Ferreira,et al.  RNA secondary structure mediates alternative 3'ss selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2012, RNA.

[19]  D. Horowitz The mechanism of the second step of pre‐mRNA splicing , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA.

[20]  Peter F. Stadler,et al.  ViennaRNA Package 2.0 , 2011, Algorithms for Molecular Biology.

[21]  X. Xia,et al.  Factors Affecting Splicing Strength of Yeast Genes , 2011, Comparative and functional genomics.

[22]  E. Eyras,et al.  Deciphering 3'ss selection in the yeast genome reveals an RNA thermosensor that mediates alternative splicing. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[23]  C. Hammann,et al.  Secondary structure is required for 3′ splice site recognition in yeast , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  M. Pellegrini,et al.  Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay mutes the splicing defects of spliceosome component mutations. , 2009, RNA.

[25]  L. Crotti,et al.  Exon sequences at the splice junctions affect splicing fidelity and alternative splicing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases , 2009, Nature Methods.

[27]  R. Luehrmann At the heart of the spliceosome. , 2008 .

[28]  C. Guthrie,et al.  Rapid, transcript-specific changes in splicing in response to environmental stress. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[29]  D. Bačíková,et al.  The Prp18 protein stabilizes the interaction of both exons with the U5 snRNA during the second step of pre-mRNA splicing. , 2007, Genes & development.

[30]  Jonathan P Staley,et al.  Exon ligation is proofread by the DExD/H-box ATPase Prp22p , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[31]  J. Beggs,et al.  Prp8 protein: at the heart of the spliceosome. , 2005, RNA.

[32]  D. Bačíková,et al.  Genetic and Functional Interaction of Evolutionarily Conserved Regions of the Prp18 Protein and the U5 snRNA , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[33]  D. Bačíková,et al.  Mutational analysis identifies two separable roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae splicing factor Prp18. , 2002, RNA.

[34]  B. Schwer,et al.  How Slu7 and Prp18 cooperate in the second step of yeast pre-mRNA splicing. , 2002, RNA.

[35]  B. Schwer,et al.  RNA helicase dynamics in pre‐mRNA splicing , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[36]  R. Xu,et al.  Crystal structure of the functional domain of the splicing factor Prp18. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Functional recognition of the 3′ splice site AG by the splicing factor U2AF35 , 1999, Nature.

[38]  L Grate,et al.  A handful of intron-containing genes produces the lion's share of yeast mRNA. , 1999, RNA.

[39]  C. Guthrie,et al.  Mechanical Devices of the Spliceosome: Motors, Clocks, Springs, and Things , 1998, Cell.

[40]  X. Zhang,et al.  Functional and physical interaction between the yeast splicing factors Slu7 and Prp18. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  C. Guthrie,et al.  Mutagenesis of the yeast gene PRP8 reveals domains governing the specificity and fidelity of 3' splice site selection. , 1996, Genetics.

[42]  Gheorghe Paun,et al.  Splicing , 2019, Bull. EATCS.

[43]  C. Guthrie,et al.  Prp16p, Slu7p, and Prp8p interact with the 3' splice site in two distinct stages during the second catalytic step of pre-mRNA splicing. , 1995, RNA.

[44]  R. Parker,et al.  Evidence for an essential non-Watson–Crick interaction between the first and last nucleotides of a nuclear pre-mRNA intron , 1993, Nature.

[45]  C. Guthrie,et al.  A conformational rearrangement in the spliceosome is dependent on PRP16 and ATP hydrolysis. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[46]  C. Guthrie,et al.  An essential splicing factor, SLU7, mediates 3' splice site choice in yeast. , 1992, Genes & development.