Ensemble Sparse Classification of Colon Cancer

Automated colon cancer detection helps get rid of the slow and laborious process of manual examination of histopathological tissue specimens using microscope, and provides a reliable second opinion to the histopathologists. Therefore, automated colon cancer detection has been the focus of research community in the past two decades, and researchers have proposed various automatic colon cancer detection systems. Most of the existing colon cancer detection systems extract features and then construct single classifier to perform classification. However, the small sample size problem and especially the noise in neuroimaging data makes it challenging to achieve good classification results by training only one global classifier. In this work, we propose a local patch based ensemble method instead of building a single global classifier. The proposed method builds multiple individual weak classifiers based on the different subsets of local patches, and then combines the output of weak classifiers for more accurate and robust classification. In particular, Haralick and Local Binary Patterns (LBP) features are extracted from pre-processed colon biopsy images, and images are partitioned into smaller fixed size patches. Features of the random subsets of patches are combined to train weak classifier. Several kernels of SVM such as linear, RBF and sigmoid are used as weak classifiers. Later, the output of various weak classifiers is combined to get the final classification results. The proposed subspace ensemble classification method yields better results compared to one global classifier in all the three cases (linear, RBF, sigmoid) in terms of various performance measures such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, Matthew's correlation coefficient, and Area Under the Curve (AUC), however, classification performance is slightly better for ensemble of RBF kernel. The proposed method has also yielded better performance compared to existing techniques on a colon cancer dataset of 174 subjects.

[1]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  Cenk Sokmensuer,et al.  Color Graphs for Automated Cancer Diagnosis and Grading , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  M F Dixon,et al.  Observer variation in the histological grading of rectal carcinoma. , 1983, Journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  Bayan S. Sharif,et al.  Microscopic image analysis for quantitative measurement and feature identification of normal and cancerous colonic mucosa , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[5]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Ensemble sparse classification of Alzheimer's disease , 2012, NeuroImage.

[6]  M.,et al.  Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture , 2022 .

[7]  M. Hussain,et al.  A novel approach for colon biopsy image segmentation , 2013, 2013 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering.

[8]  A N Esgiar,et al.  Automated feature extraction and identification of colon carcinoma. , 1998, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[9]  Asifullah Khan,et al.  Automated colon cancer detection using hybrid of novel geometric features and some traditional features , 2015, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[10]  Abdul Jalil,et al.  Novel structural descriptors for automated colon cancer detection and grading , 2015, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[11]  J. Hardcastle,et al.  Colorectal cancer , 1993, Europe Against Cancer European Commission Series for General Practitioners.

[12]  Kashif Rajpoot,et al.  Co-occurrence and morphological analysis for colon tissue biopsy classification , 2006 .

[13]  Abdul Jalil,et al.  A novel approach for ensemble clustering of colon biopsy images , 2013, 2013 11th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology.

[14]  Cenk Sokmensuer,et al.  Unsupervised Tissue Image Segmentation through Object-Oriented Texture , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Abdul Jalil,et al.  Classification of colon biopsy images based on novel structural features , 2013, 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET).

[16]  Cigdem Demir,et al.  A Hybrid Classification Model for Digital Pathology Using Structural and Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Abdul Jalil,et al.  Ensemble classification of colon biopsy images based on information rich hybrid features , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[18]  Saima Rathore,et al.  CBISC: A Novel Approach for Colon Biopsy Image Segmentation and Classification , 2016 .

[19]  Cenk Sokmensuer,et al.  Object-oriented texture analysis for the unsupervised segmentation of biopsy images for cancer detection , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  Ahmad Ali,et al.  A Recent Survey on Colon Cancer Detection Techniques , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[21]  Nasir M. Rajpoot,et al.  Texture based classification of hyperspectral colon biopsy samples using CLBP , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[22]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .