Evaluating the success of pay-by-use (PBU) domestic waste charges in Ireland

Irish waste collectors were advised by the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government to adopt pay-by-use (PBU) domestic waste charges from 1 January 2005. The measure was taken to combat the rising volumes of waste produced nationally and to apply the ‘polluter pays’ principle to waste charging, in line with EU principles. The implementation of PBU domestic waste charges in Ireland and the impact of these charges nationally, in terms of waste to landfill, recycling and illegal waste diversion, were examined using a combination of postal surveys and telephone interviews with local authorities. The research revealed that PBU has had the desired effect of reducing waste to landfill. However, as currently applied in Ireland, PBU is not reaching its full potential. The use of a variety of PBU charging systems across the country, with one system used widely in Ireland considered internationally as the least effective PBU system available, and the absence of universal curbside recycling services, may have contributed to the relatively small decreases in waste to landfill on a nationwide level when compared to reductions reported internationally.

[1]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Household Responses to Pricing Garbage by the Bag , 1994 .

[2]  Sally Eden,et al.  Environmental issues: knowledge, uncertainty and the environment , 1998 .

[3]  Marie Lynn Miranda,et al.  Unit pricing of residential municipal solid waste: lessons from nine case study communities , 1998 .

[4]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Garbage and Recycling with Endogenous Local Policy , 2000 .

[5]  Stewart Barr,et al.  Strategies for sustainability: citizens and responsible environmental behaviour , 2003 .

[6]  Vincent Linderhof,et al.  Weight-based pricing in the collection of household waste: the Oostzaan case , 2001 .

[7]  Elbert Dijkgraaf,et al.  Cost Savings of Unit-Based Pricing of Household Waste: The Case of the Netherlands , 2004 .

[8]  Mikael Skou Andersen,et al.  A Baumol–Oates approach to solid waste taxation , 2002 .

[9]  T. Sterner,et al.  Household Waste Management in a Swedish Municipality: Determinants of Waste Disposal, Recycling and Composting , 1999 .

[10]  K. Wertz,et al.  Economic factors influencing households' production of refuse , 1976 .

[11]  Robin R. Jenkins,et al.  The Determinants of Household Recycling: A Material Specific Analysis of Recycling Program Features and Unit Pricing , 2003 .

[12]  Michael J. Podolsky,et al.  Assessing Incentive‐Based Environmental Policies For Reducing Household Waste Disposal , 1998 .

[13]  Ida Ferrara,et al.  Recycling and Waste Diversion Effectiveness: Evidence from Canada , 2005 .

[14]  David Taylor,et al.  Mind the gap! Householder attitudes and actions towards waste in Ireland , 2005 .

[15]  M. Miranda,et al.  THE URBAN PERFORMANCE OF UNIT PRICING: AN ANALYSIS OF VARIABLE RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE COLLECTION IN URBAN AREAS , 1996 .

[16]  L. Dunne.  An investigation into waste taxes and charges , 2004 .

[17]  Marie Lynn Miranda,et al.  Unit-Based Pricing and Undesirable Diversion: Market Prices and Community Characteristics , 2002 .

[18]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Garbage, Recycling, and Illicit Burning or Dumping , 1993 .

[19]  James D. Reschovsky,et al.  Market incentives to encourage household waste recycling: Paying for what you throw away , 1994 .

[20]  Richard M. Adams,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Household Recycling of Solid Wastes: The Case of Portland, Oregon , 1993 .