Best in Class or Simply the Best? The Impact of Absolute versus Relative Ecolabeling Approaches

Although research has widely investigated labels across a range of product domains, one understudied area is the use of absolute versus relative rating approaches to information provision. For example, under an absolute rating approach to vehicle ecolabels, the consumer is informed of the actual amount of fuel consumed during use of a vehicle compared with that of all other vehicles on the market. Under a relative rating approach, the fuel consumption is communicated in relative terms, comparing the vehicle only with others in the same class. The current research illustrates that switching from an absolute to a relative rating approach can lead to a reversal effect in the perception of a car's environmental friendliness. For example, a sport-utility vehicle can be perceived as either environmentally friendly or not, depending on the type of rating approach used. The authors demonstrate that visual representation drives this effect, using a colored alphabetical rating scale to communicate environmental performance.

[1]  M. Teisl,et al.  Non-dirty dancing? Interactions between eco-labels and consumers , 2008 .

[2]  Barbara A. Mellers,et al.  American attitudes toward nudges , 2016, Judgment and Decision Making.

[3]  Richard Staelin,et al.  The Effect of Nutritional Information Disclosure in Advertising: An Information Processing Approach , 1984 .

[4]  Scot Burton,et al.  Consumer Generalization of Nutrient Content Claims in Advertising , 1998 .

[5]  Yasuhiro Fuwa,et al.  Decision-making in electrical appliance use in the home , 2008 .

[6]  Håkon Sælen,et al.  'Nudging' hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win-win environmental measure , 2013 .

[7]  Manoj Hastak,et al.  Understanding and Facilitating the Usage of Nutritional Labels by Low-Literate Consumers , 2009 .

[8]  On Amir,et al.  Stumble, Predict, Nudge: How Behavioral Economics Informs Law and Policy , 2009 .

[9]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Life Cycle Cost: A New Form of Consumer Information , 1980 .

[10]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[11]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Chris Arney Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2015 .

[13]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Visual Representation: Implications for Decision Making , 2007 .

[14]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  The Calcium Quandary: How Consumers use Nutrition Labels , 2006 .

[15]  Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.  Disclosure of Odds Information: An Experimental Investigation of Odds Format and Numeric Complexity , 1998 .

[16]  Raymond E. Schucker,et al.  Performance Characteristics of Seven Nutrition Label Formats , 1996 .

[17]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Information displays and preference reversals , 1988 .

[18]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  The misleading effect of energy efficiency information on perceived energy friendliness of electric goods , 2015 .

[19]  Markus A. Maier,et al.  Basic hue-meaning associations. , 2009, Emotion.

[20]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Desired and Undesired Effects of Energy Labels—An Eye-Tracking Study , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Public Policy and Consumer Information: Impact of the New Energy Labels , 1979 .

[22]  B. Wansink,et al.  Plate Size and Color Suggestibility: The Delboeuf Illusion’s Bias on Serving and Eating Behavior , 2012 .

[23]  Verena Tiefenbeck,et al.  For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign , 2013 .

[24]  Reimund Schwarze,et al.  Nudging as a new 'soft' tool in environmental policy. An analysis based on insights from cognitive and social psychology , 2015 .

[25]  D. J. Ringold,et al.  Boomerang Effects in Response to Public Health Interventions: Some Unintended Consequences in the Alcoholic Beverage Market , 2002 .

[26]  P. Slovic,et al.  Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. , 2007, Health affairs.

[27]  John D. Claxton,et al.  Barriers to Consumer Choice of Energy Efficient Products , 1982 .

[28]  Stefanie Heinzle,et al.  Disclosure of Energy Operating Cost Information: A Silver Bullet for Overcoming the Energy-Efficiency Gap? , 2012 .

[29]  Peggy J. Liu,et al.  Using Behavioral Economics to Design More Effective Food Policies to Address Obesity , 2014 .

[30]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Graphic displays in decision making — the visual salience effect , 1990 .

[31]  I. Kawachi,et al.  Use of psychology and behavioral economics to promote healthy eating. , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.

[32]  René Lion,et al.  Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: Testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries , 2008, Appetite.

[33]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Energy-efficiency labels and standards: A guidebook for appliances, equipment and lighting , 2001 .

[34]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  The Effect of Life Cycle Cost Information on Consumer Investment Decisions Regarding Eco‐Innovation , 2009 .

[35]  Miles Richardson,et al.  An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements , 2007, Public Health Nutrition.

[36]  Shelley E. Taylor Judgment under uncertainty: The availability bias in social perception and interaction , 1982 .

[37]  J. Mazanec,et al.  Consumer decision making. , 1994 .

[38]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[39]  Adrien Barton,et al.  From Libertarian Paternalism to Nudging—and Beyond , 2015 .

[40]  Evan Selinger,et al.  Is There a Right Way to Nudge? The Practice and Ethics of Choice Architecture , 2011 .

[41]  J. Thøgersen Psychological Determinants of Paying Attention to Eco-Labels in Purchase Decisions: Model Development and Multinational Validation , 2000 .

[42]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Informing Versus Nudging in Environmental Policy , 2014 .

[43]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[44]  B. Wyse,et al.  Nutrition labels in bar graph format deemed most useful for consumer purchase decisions using adaptive conjoint analysis. , 1991, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[45]  Haiyang Yang,et al.  Consumer Decision Making , 2015 .

[46]  Jrc Jaap Ham,et al.  Making it not too obvious: the effect of ambient light feedback on space heating energy consumption , 2011 .

[47]  Markus A. Maier,et al.  Color psychology: effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[48]  Wendy W. Moe,et al.  Displaying Common but Previously Neglected Health Claims on Product Labels: Understanding Competitive Advantages, Deception, and Education , 1997 .

[49]  Scot Burton,et al.  Effects of Alternative Nutrition Label Formats and Nutrition Reference Information on Consumer Perceptions, Comprehension, and Product Evaluations , 1994 .

[50]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Goals as Reference Points , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[51]  R. Thaler,et al.  Choice Architecture , 2010 .

[52]  A. Rao,et al.  The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers’ Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review , 1989 .

[53]  Martin Meißner,et al.  Not worth the extra cost? Diluting the differentiation ability of highly rated products by altering the meaning of rating scale levels , 2013 .

[54]  C. Sunstein Nudging and Choice Architecture: Ethical Considerations , 2015 .

[55]  Adrian R. Camilleri,et al.  Metric and Scale Design as Choice Architecture Tools , 2014 .

[56]  James M Olson,et al.  Is It All Relative? , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[57]  Yurii B. Shvetsov,et al.  Common Genetic Variation In Cellular Transport Genes and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) Risk , 2015, PloS one.

[58]  John W. Payne,et al.  Cognitive Considerations in Designing Effective Labels for Presenting Risk Information , 1986 .

[59]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Dynamic Adjustment of Eco-labeling Schemes and Consumer Choice – the Revision of the EU Energy Label as a Missed Opportunity? , 2012 .

[60]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Warnings of Adverse Side Effects Can Backfire Over Time , 2013, Psychological science.

[61]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture , 2012 .

[62]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Promoting Healthy Choices: Information versus Convenience , 2010 .

[63]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[64]  Bernadette Sütterlin,et al.  Letters, signs, and colors: How the display of energy-efficiency information influences consumer assessments of products , 2016 .

[65]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Nudging: A Very Short Guide , 2014, How Change Happens.

[66]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[67]  Sophie Hieke,et al.  A Critical Review of the Literature on Nutritional Labeling , 2012 .

[68]  B. Wansink,et al.  Ice cream illusions bowls, spoons, and self-served portion sizes. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[69]  Matthias Deutsch,et al.  Life Cycle Cost Disclosure, Consumer Behavior, and Business Implications , 2010 .

[70]  Paul W. Miniard,et al.  Another Look at the Impact of Reference Information on Consumer Impressions of Nutrition Information , 1996 .

[71]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour , 2003 .

[72]  Douglas E Levy,et al.  Traffic-light labels and choice architecture: promoting healthy food choices. , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.