Amplitude and Spatial-Period Discrimination in Sinusoidal Gratings by Dynamic Touch

We measured discrimination thresholds for sinusoidal gratings using active dynamic touch. In the first experiment we measured the thresholds for amplitude discrimination as a function of amplitude and spatial period. Thresholds ranged between 10.8% and 15.8% of the standard amplitude. We showed that amplitude differences as small as 2 μm can be detected. We found that Weber fractions for amplitude discrimination are constant over a range of amplitudes, but are influenced by the spatial period of the grating; discrimination improved with increasing spatial period. In the second experiment we determined the thresholds for spatial-period discrimination. We used the same design as in the first experiment. Weber fractions ranged from 6.4% to 11.8%. Amplitude was found to have no effect on the Weber fractions for spatial-period discrimination. However, the spatial period had an effect on the Weber fractions: larger spatial periods yielded lower Weber fractions.

[1]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  J M Loomis,et al.  An investigation of tactile hyperacuity. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[3]  J. Loomis.  Tactile Pattern Perception , 1981, Perception.

[4]  S. Lederman.  The perception of surface roughness by active and passive touch , 1981 .

[5]  K O Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  M. Heller.  Visual and tactual texture perception: Intersensory cooperation , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  G. Lamb.  Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: psychophysical performance measurements in humans. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  C. Van Doren,et al.  A model of spatiotemporal tactile sensitivity linking psychophysics to tissue mechanics. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  K O Johnson,et al.  The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans , 1994, Neurology.

[11]  K. Sathian,et al.  Tactile learning is task specific but transfers between fingers , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  T Mano,et al.  Mechanisms of fine-surface-texture discrimination in human tactile sensation. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  The Two-Point Threshold , 2000 .

[14]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Haptic detection thresholds of Gaussian profiles over the whole range of spatial scales , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Frequency discrimination between and within line gratings by dynamic touch , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.