GRW as an ontology of dispositions

The paper argues that the formulation of quantum mechanics proposed by Ghirardi, Rimini and Weber (GRW) is a serious candidate for being a fundamental physical theory and explores its ontological commitments from this perspective. In particular, we propose to conceive of spatial superpositions of non-massless microsystems as dispositions or powers, more precisely propensities, to generate spontaneous localizations. We set out five reasons for this view, namely that (1) it provides for a clear sense in which quantum systems in entangled states possess properties even in the absence of definite values; (2) it vindicates objective, single-case probabilities; (3) it yields a clear transition from quantum to classical properties; (4) it enables to draw a clear distinction between purely mathematical and physical structures, and (5) it grounds the arrow of time in the time-irreversible manifestation of the propensities to localize.

[1]  GianCarlo Ghirardi,et al.  Dynamical reduction models , 2003 .

[2]  H. Putnam.  A Philosopher Looks at Quantum Mechanics (Again)* , 2005, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[3]  Alexander J Bird,et al.  Nature's metaphysics : laws and properties , 2007 .

[4]  Weber,et al.  Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. , 1986, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[5]  Andreas Hüttemann,et al.  Laws and Dispositions , 1998 .

[6]  Mauricio Suárez,et al.  Quantum Selections, Propensities and the Problem of Measurement , 2004, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[7]  A. Alexandrova.  The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 1965, Nature.

[8]  Angelo Bassi,et al.  Quantum Mechanics: Are there Quantum Jumps? and On the Present Status of Quantum Mechanics , 2006 .

[9]  Wilfrid S. Sellars,et al.  PHILOSOPHY AND THE SCIENTIFIC IMAGE OF MAN , 2007 .

[10]  D. Bohm.  A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .

[11]  Guido Bacciagaluppi,et al.  The Role of Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics , 2012 .

[12]  James T. Cushing,et al.  Bohmian mechanics and quantum theory: an appraisal , 1996 .

[13]  Roman Frigg,et al.  Probability in GRW Theory , 2007 .

[14]  Martin Daumer,et al.  Naive Realism about Operators , 1996 .

[15]  GianCarlo Ghirardi,et al.  Sneaking a Look at God's Cards: Unraveling the Mysteries of Quantum Mechanics , 2004 .

[16]  Sydney Shoemaker,et al.  Causality and Properties , 1980 .

[17]  C. Allen,et al.  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2011 .

[18]  Sydney Shoemaker,et al.  Identity, Cause, And Mind , 1984 .

[19]  F. G. KENYON,et al.  Time and Chance , 1943, Nature.

[20]  B. Loewer,et al.  Tails of Schrödinger’s Cat , 1996 .

[21]  R. Shankar,et al.  Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 2010 .

[22]  Rom Harré,et al.  Laws of Nature , 1970 .

[23]  M. Suárez.  On Quantum Propensities: Two Arguments Revisited , 2004 .

[24]  Robert Garland Colodny,et al.  Frontiers of science and philosophy , 1963 .

[25]  Stephen L. Adler,et al.  Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: A Response to P. W. Anderson , 2003 .

[26]  Barry Loewer,et al.  Interpreting the many worlds interpretation , 1988, Synthese.

[27]  R. Tumulka.  A Relativistic Version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Model , 2004, quant-ph/0406094.

[28]  Sheldon Goldstein,et al.  Quantum Equilibrium and the Role of Operators as Observables in Quantum Theory , 2003, quant-ph/0308038.

[29]  Rob Clifton,et al.  Perspectives on Quantum Reality , 1996 .

[30]  Michael Lockwood,et al.  Mind, Brain, and the Quantum: The Compound 'i' , 1991 .

[31]  D. Albert.  Elementary Quantum Metaphysics , 1996 .

[32]  H. Everett.  "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[33]  H. Dingle.  The Laws of Nature* , 1944, Nature.

[34]  Max Kistler,et al.  Dispositions and Causal Powers , 2007 .

[35]  Mauro Dorato.  Properties and Dispositions: Some Metaphysical Remarks on Quantum Ontology , 2006 .

[36]  W. Craig,et al.  Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity , 2007 .

[37]  Philip Kitcher,et al.  Explanation, Conjunction, and Unification , 1976 .

[38]  G. Ghirardi,et al.  Describing the macroscopic world: Closing the circle within the dynamical reduction program , 1994 .

[39]  Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories , 1999, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[40]  GianCarlo Ghirardi,et al.  Do Dynamical Reduction Models Imply that Arithmetic Does Not Apply to Ordinary Macroscopic Objects? , 1998, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[41]  Roderich Tumulka,et al.  What Is Bohmian Mechanics , 2001, Compendium of Quantum Physics.

[42]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics , 1988 .

[43]  D. Lewis.  A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance , 1980 .

[44]  D. M. Armstrong,et al.  The Causal Theory of Properties: Properties according to Shoemaker, Ellis, and Others , 1999 .

[45]  Henry P. Stapp,et al.  The Undivided Universe: An ontological interpretation of Quantum Theory , 1994 .

[46]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[47]  S. Goldstein,et al.  On the Common Structure of Bohmian Mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Theory , 2006, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[48]  D. Braddon-Mitchell.  NATURE'S CAPACITIES AND THEIR MEASUREMENT , 1991 .

[49]  J. Bell,et al.  Schrödinger: Are there quantum jumps? , 1987 .

[50]  Stathis Psillos,et al.  Living with the abstract: realism and models , 2011, Synthese.

[51]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Why Propensities Cannot Be Probabilities , 1985, Philosophical Papers.

[52]  Mauro Dorato.  Dispositions, Relational Properties and the Quantum World , 2003 .

[53]  David Deutsch.  Quantum theory of probability and decisions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[54]  Nancy Cartwright.  Where Do Laws of Nature Come From , 2005 .

[55]  M. Friedman.  Explanation and Scientific Understanding , 1974 .