Learning to Learn: Infants’ Acquisition of Stress-Based Strategies for Word Segmentation

A majority of English words are stressed on their first syllable. Infants use stress as a cue to word segmentation, but it is unclear how infants discover the correlation between stress and word boundaries. We exposed English-learning infants to a list of words stressed on their second syllable to discover whether infants can learn a new relation between stress and word boundaries. English-learning infants treat stressed syllables as word onsets, which is incorrect in words where stressed syllables occur second (iambic words). A brief exposure allowed infants to subsequently segment iambic words correctly, whether the exposure consisted of 100% or 80% iambic words. We also trained 7-month-olds—who typically rely on transitional probabilities—to use stress as a cue to word segmentation. The results suggest that infants are sensitive to the distribution of stress across word position and that altering this distribution affects their segmentation strategies.

[1]  R. Gómez,et al.  Twelve-Month-Old Infants Benefit From Prior Experience in Statistical Learning , 2008, Psychological science.

[2]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Stress changes the representational landscape: evidence from word segmentation , 2005, Cognition.

[3]  Suzanne Curtin,et al.  PRIMIR: A Developmental Framework of Infant Speech Processing , 2005 .

[4]  Daniel Swingley,et al.  Statistical clustering and the contents of the infant vocabulary , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Infant-Directed Speech Facilitates Word Segmentation. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[6]  Elizabeth K. Johnson.  English-Learning Infants' Representations of Word Forms With Iambic Stress. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[7]  R. Gómez,et al.  A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants. , 2004, Developmental science.

[8]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Spectral tilt as a cue to word segmentation in infancy and adulthood , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  English-learning infants’ segmentation of trisyllabic words from fluent speech , 2004 .

[10]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[11]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Pattern induction by infant language learners. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[12]  J. Saffran,et al.  From Syllables to Syntax: Multilevel Statistical Learning by 12-Month-Old Infants , 2003 .

[13]  Kristine H. Onishi,et al.  Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience , 2003, Cognition.

[14]  L. Polka,et al.  The role of language experience in word segmentation: A comparison of English, French, and bilingual infants , 2002 .

[15]  Jessica Maye,et al.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination , 2002, Cognition.

[16]  M. Brent,et al.  The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development , 2001, Cognition.

[17]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Word Segmentation by 8-Month-Olds: When Speech Cues Count More Than Statistics , 2001 .

[18]  Mary R. Newsome,et al.  The Beginnings of Word Segmentation in English-Learning Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Peter W. Jusczyk,et al.  How infants begin to extract words from speech , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[22]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Learning to Segment Speech Using Multiple Cues: A Connectionist Model , 1998 .

[23]  Catharine H. Echols,et al.  The perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults. , 1997 .

[24]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[25]  V. V. Heuven,et al.  Why stress position bias? , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Young children's production of syllable stress: an acoustic analysis. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J. Mehler,et al.  Morae and Syllables: Rhythmical Basis of Speech Representations in Neonates , 1995, Language and speech.

[28]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  J R Saffran,et al.  Emerging integration of sequential and suprasegmental information in preverbal speech segmentation. , 1995, Child development.

[30]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. , 1993, Child development.

[31]  T. Crystal,et al.  Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  T. Crystal,et al.  Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: Syllabic stress , 1988 .

[33]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[34]  C. Pye,et al.  Higher pitch in BT is not universal: acoustic evidence from Quiche Mayan , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[35]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Perception of a phonetic contrast in multisyllabic utterances by 2-month-old infants , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  P. Lieberman.  Some Acoustic Correlates of Word Stress in American English , 1959 .

[37]  L. Polka,et al.  Word segmentation in monolingual and bilingual infant learners of English and French , 2003 .

[38]  L J Trainor,et al.  Infants’ and adults’ use of duration and intensity cues in the segmentation of tone patterns , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  E. W. Ames,et al.  A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. , 1988 .