The impact of process structure on novice, virtual collaborative writing teams

Asynchronous-distributed (AD) collaborative writing (CW) is an important form of the growing trend of distributed work. However, AD CW typically results in multiple process losses. We argue that using advanced writing technologies designed for AD work alone is not sufficient by itself to overcome these losses. Instead, adopting high levels of process structure delivered in the form of explicitly written procedural scripts can improve the results of AD CW groups. We performed an experiment with over 500 participants working in groups supported by advanced CW technologies that were designed for AD work. Participants were given six weeks to conduct their work. We found that high levels of process structure in novice AD CW groups that worked on a moderately complex task created significantly better outcomes than did groups using low levels of process structure. Groups with high levels of process structure had better results in terms of production, document quality, satisfaction, relationships, and communication. In no case did low-structure groups outperform high-structure groups. This research supports our hypothesis that increased process structure delivered in the form of a repeatable process script can decrease process losses and increase process gains in novice AD CW groups. We conclude that it is not sufficient to give novice AD writing groups CW technology and time to conduct their tasks; these groups also need appropriate procedural support, which can be provided effectively through written scripts.

[1]  J. Walther Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[2]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Communication Concurrency and the New Media , 1993 .

[3]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  How Much Bandwidth Is Enough? A Longitudinal Examination of Media Characteristics and Group Outcomes , 1999, MIS Q..

[4]  J.F. Nunamaker,et al.  Creating hybrid distributed learning environments by implementing distributed collaborative writing in traditional educational settings , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[5]  Carol M. Barnum Collaborative Writing in Graduate Technical Communication: Is there a Difference? , 1994 .

[6]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Getting a Clue , 1996 .

[7]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes , 1974 .

[8]  S. Weisband Maintaining Awareness in Distributed Team Collaboration: Implications for Leadership and Performance , 2002 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[10]  J D Johnson,et al.  The Impact of Formalization, Role Conflict, Role Ambiguity, and Communication Quality on Perceived Organizational Innovativeness in the Cancer Information Service , 1998, Evaluation & the health professions.

[11]  Shaila M. Miranda,et al.  Avoidance of Groupthink , 1994 .

[12]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Distributed Group Support Systems , 1993, MIS Q..

[13]  Joseph C. Chilberg A Review of Group Process Designs for Facilitating Communication in Problem-Solving Groups , 1989 .

[14]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Evolutionary development and research on Internet-based collaborative writing tools and processes to enhance eWriting in an eGovernment setting , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Effects of Distributed Group Support and Process Structuring on Software Requirements Development Teams: Results on Creativity and Quality , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Mary M. Lay,et al.  Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigations in Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[17]  Jolene Galegher,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: An Experiment in Group Writing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations , 1990 .

[19]  Christine Neuwirth,et al.  Envisioning communication: task-tailorable representations of communication in asynchronous work , 1998, CSCW '98.

[20]  Robert E. Kraut Research Recommendations to Facilitate Distributed Work , 1994 .

[21]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  L. Anderson-Inman Synchronous Writing Environments: Real-Time Interaction in Cyberspace (Technology Tidbits). , 1996 .

[23]  Johann H. Schlichter,et al.  Workspae Awareness for Distributed Teams , 1996, Coordination Technology for Collaborative Applications.

[24]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Interactive versus stand-alone group decision support systems for stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  Geoffrey A. Cross Collective Form: An Exploration of Large-Group Writing 1998 Outstanding Researcher Lecture , 2000 .

[26]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Distributed group support systems: Social dynamics and design dilemmas , 1991 .

[27]  B. E. Wynne,et al.  An experiment assessing group support system and facilitator effects on meeting outcomes , 1995 .

[28]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[29]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Distributed GSS facilitation and participation: field action research , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[30]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  How a group-editor changes the character of a design meeting as well as its outcome , 1992, CSCW '92.

[32]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Contact: Support for Distributed Cooperative Writing , 1995, ECSCW.

[33]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[34]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. , 1982 .

[35]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Maintaining Awareness in Distributed Team Collaboration: Implications for Leadership and Performance , 2002 .

[36]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Beta Versus VHS and the Acceptance of Electronic Brainstorming Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[37]  T. Cerratto Pargman INSTRUMENTING COLLABORATIVE WRITING AND ITS COGNITIVE TOOLS , 1999 .

[38]  Annette Cecilia. Easton,et al.  An experimental investigation of automated versus manual support for stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups , 1988 .

[39]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950-1990 , 1992 .

[40]  K. Wei,et al.  Effects of facilitation and leadership on meeting outcomes in a group support system environment , 1999 .

[41]  James J. Regan Tracking performance related to display-control configurations. , 1960 .

[42]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[43]  G. Simmel The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[44]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups: an experimental study , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track.

[45]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Tools for distributed facilitation , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[46]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction , 2002 .

[47]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  The Effects of Group Decision Support Systems and Task Structures on Group Communication and Decision Quality , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[48]  J. Hackman,et al.  Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups , 1974 .

[49]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  Exploring Modes of Facilitative Support for GDSS Technology , 1993, MIS Q..

[50]  A. Osborn Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 1953 .

[51]  Jane N. Mosier,et al.  Collaborative Writing Is Hard to Support: A Field Study of Collaborative Writing , 1997, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[52]  L Kimball,et al.  The virtual team: strategies to optimize performance. , 1999, Health Forum journal.

[53]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Computer-mediated communication in collaborative writing , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[54]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Electronic brainstorming: Theory, research, and future directions. , 2003 .

[55]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..

[56]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An assessment of group support systems research: results , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[57]  K. Burke,et al.  A Study of Partially Distributed Work Groups , 1999 .

[58]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Research on Process Structure for Distributed, Asynchronous Collaborative Writing Groups , 2002 .

[59]  S. Glaser,et al.  Measuring and Interpreting Organizational Culture , 1987 .

[60]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  An interactionist perspective on dominance‐submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill , 2000 .

[61]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Groupwork close up: a comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor , 1993, TOIS.

[62]  J. Smith,et al.  A nonsimultaneous computer conference as a component of group decision support systems , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track.

[63]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  A Taxonomy of Collaborative Writing to Improve Empirical Research, Writing Practice, and Tool Development , 2004 .

[64]  Dominique Decouchant,et al.  Structured Cooperative Authoring for the World Wide Web , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[65]  Ron Blicq Collaborative editing at a distance , 1998, IPCC 98. Contemporary Renaissance: Changing the Way we Communicate. Proceedings 1998 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (Cat. No.98CH36332).

[66]  Stephen C. Hayne,et al.  Distributed facilitation: a concept whose time has come? , 1992, CSCW '92.

[67]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  Understanding Computer-Supported Group Work: The Effects of Interaction Frequency on Group Process and Outcome , 1995 .

[68]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication , 1987 .

[69]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Groupware: some issues and experiences , 1991, CACM.

[70]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[71]  Helmut Lamm,et al.  Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency , 1973 .

[72]  Laurel Austin,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Face-to-Face Collaborative Technology on Group Writing , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[73]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .

[74]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[75]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Using Internet-based, distributed collaborative writing tools to improve coordination and group awareness in writing teams , 2003 .

[76]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Effects of Four Modes of Group Communication on the Outcomes of Software Requirements Determination , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[77]  L. R. Hoffman,et al.  Quality of first and second solutions in group problem solving. , 1960 .

[78]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[79]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Interruptions, Task Complexity, and Information Presentation on Computer-Supported Decision-Making Performance , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[80]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Meeting facilitation: process versus content interventions , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[81]  Stephen C. Hayne,et al.  The facilitators perspective on meetings and implications for group support systems design , 1999, DATB.

[82]  P. Lowry,et al.  Building a Taxonomy and Nomenclature of Collaborative Writing to Improve Interdisciplinary Research and Practice , 2004 .

[83]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Process Structuring in Electronic Brainstorming , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[84]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision‐making discussions , 1978 .

[85]  Telecommunications Board,et al.  Research Recommendations to Facilitate Distributed Work , 1994 .

[86]  Teresa Moore,et al.  What Experienced Collaborators Say About Collaborative Writing , 1987 .