An extended three-way decision and its application in member selection

The three-way decision method is a kind of new developed uncertain decision theory that combines fuzzy sets and rough sets together in recent years. It divides a set of objects into three regions, called the acceptance, rejection and uncertain regions, respectively. However, all the current researches deal with the three regions in the same way and do not provide further analysis on the most important uncertain region. In this paper, we propose an extended three-way decision method, called partial fuzzy sets, which regard acceptance region and rejection region as certain so as to focus on the uncertain region. Both certainty and uncertainty are simultaneously considered, that is more consistent with human thinking in decision making. Then, we establish two operational algorithms, called approximate approach and enhanced approximate approach, respectively. The approximate approach considers that the group accepts the certain information as far as possible. Specially speaking, based on approximate approach, if other members in a group are all uncertain to a judgment except one or two, who accept or reject it surely, then the group would agree with the certain judgment, even that they might be the minority. On the base of approximate approach, enhanced approximate approach reduces the possible bias through removing the maximal and the minimal membership grades in the group evaluation before aggregation. Obviously, the proposed methods provide more effective ways for three-way decisions than the current researches by avoiding some redundant and unnecessary computations, especially for the case with abundant of alternatives. Two numerical examples are provided to illustrate the practicality and validity of the proposed methods.

[1]  Daniel Neff,et al.  Fuzzy set theoretic applications in poverty research , 2013 .

[2]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[3]  Jingtao Yao,et al.  Modelling Multi-agent Three-way Decisions with Decision-theoretic Rough Sets , 2012, Fundam. Informaticae.

[4]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Three-way Investment Decisions with Decision-theoretic Rough Sets , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[5]  Bo Feng,et al.  A multiple attributes decision making method using individual and collaborative attribute data in a fuzzy environment , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Two Semantic Issues in a Probabilistic Rough Set Model , 2011, Fundam. Informaticae.

[7]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rudiments of rough sets , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[8]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set models , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[9]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[10]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[11]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Cost-sensitive three-way email spam filtering , 2013, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[12]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Quantitative rough sets based on subsethood measures , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[13]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Decision-theoretic three-way approximations of fuzzy sets , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[14]  Decui Liang,et al.  Incorporating logistic regression to decision-theoretic rough sets for classifications , 2014, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[15]  K. Atanassov Operators over interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1994 .

[16]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Constructive and Algebraic Methods of the Theory of Rough Sets , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[17]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Generalization of Rough Sets using Modal Logics , 1996, Intell. Autom. Soft Comput..

[18]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Relational Interpretations of Neigborhood Operators and Rough Set Approximation Operators , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[19]  Tianrui Li,et al.  THREE-WAY GOVERNMENT DECISION ANALYSIS WITH DECISION-THEORETIC ROUGH SETS , 2012 .

[20]  Jian Wu,et al.  The extended COWG operators and their application to multiple attributive group decision making problems with interval numbers , 2011 .

[21]  Hongbin Liu,et al.  A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Peide Liu,et al.  Method for Multiple Attribute Decision-making under Risk with Interval Numbers , 2010 .

[23]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  A Multifaceted Analysis of Probabilistic Three-way Decisions , 2014, Fundam. Informaticae.

[24]  Bingzhen Sun,et al.  Soft fuzzy rough sets and its application in decision making , 2011, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[25]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[26]  Petr Ekel,et al.  A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[27]  Sophia Seung-yoon Lee,et al.  Fuzzy-set method in comparative social policy: a critical introduction and review of the applications of the fuzzy-set method , 2013 .

[28]  K. Atanassov More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1989 .

[29]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Bao Qing Hu,et al.  Three-way decisions space and three-way decisions , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[31]  Haiyan Zhao,et al.  Decision-theoretic rough fuzzy set model and application , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[32]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[33]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[34]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[35]  Zhongliang Yue,et al.  An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..