Effect of Temporal Artery Biopsy Length and Laterality on Diagnostic Yield

Background: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis in adults and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) remains the gold standard for diagnosis in the United States; however, practices vary in the length of artery obtained and whether bilateral simultaneous biopsies are obtained. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all TABs performed at the Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute between July 1, 2007, and September 30, 2017. Results: Five hundred eighty-six patients underwent TAB to evaluate for GCA. Of 404 unilateral biopsies, 68 (16.8%) were positive. Of 182 patients with bilateral biopsies, 25 (13.7%) had biopsies that were positive and 5 patients (2.7%) had biopsies that were discordant, meaning only 1 side was positive. There was no significant difference in the average postfixation length of positive and negative TAB specimens (positive mean length 1.38 ± 0.61 cm, negative mean length 1.39 ± 0.62 cm, P = 0.9). Conclusions: There is no significant association between greater length of biopsy and a positive TAB result in our data. Although the rate of positive results was not higher in the bilateral group compared with the unilateral group, 2.7% of bilateral biopsies were discordant, similar to previously published rates. Overall, this suggests that initial bilateral biopsy may increase diagnostic yield, albeit by a small amount.

[1]  S. Mackie,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Symptoms, Physical Signs, and Laboratory Tests for Giant Cell Arteritis , 2020, JAMA internal medicine.

[2]  Andrew R. Carey,et al.  Association of Giant Cell Arteritis With Race. , 2019, JAMA ophthalmology.

[3]  N. Floros,et al.  Temporal artery biopsy in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: Bigger is not always better. , 2017, American journal of surgery.

[4]  I. Barshack,et al.  Association between specimen length and diagnostic yield of temporal artery biopsy , 2017, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[5]  P. McCluskey,et al.  Increase in the length of superficial temporal artery biopsy over 14 years , 2016, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[6]  S. Vig,et al.  Temporal artery biopsy size does not matter , 2014, Vascular.

[7]  E. Weis,et al.  Incidence of discordant temporal artery biopsy in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. , 2014, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[8]  A. Karthikesalingam,et al.  Importance of specimen length during temporal artery biopsy , 2011, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  M. Chung,et al.  Temporal Artery Biopsy as a Means of Diagnosing Giant Cell Arteritis: Is There Over-Utilization? , 2011, The American surgeon.

[10]  R. Nesher,et al.  Rate of Discordant Findings in Bilateral Temporal Artery Biopsy to Diagnose Giant Cell Arteritis , 2009, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[11]  R. Nesher,et al.  Effect of biopsy length on the rate of positive temporal artery biopsies. , 2009, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[12]  J Coste,et al.  Temporal artery biopsy for diagnosing giant cell arteritis: the longer, the better? , 2006, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  D. Scott,et al.  Epidemiology of the Vasculitides , 2004, Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine.

[14]  J. Rizzo,et al.  Concordance of Bilateral Temporal Artery Biopsy in Giant Cell Arteritis , 2000, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[15]  D. Poller,et al.  The importance of skip lesions in temporal arteritis , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[16]  P. Brazis,et al.  Temporal Arteritis: A Clinical Approach , 1999, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[17]  W. Green,et al.  Efficacy of unilateral versus bilateral temporal artery biopsies for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. , 1999, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  S S Hayreh,et al.  Giant cell arteritis: validity and reliability of various diagnostic criteria. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  G. Hunder,et al.  Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  R. Klein,et al.  Skip lesions in temporal arteritis. , 1976, Mayo Clinic proceedings.