A Theoretical Framework for Circular Economy Research in the Built Environment

Circular economy is quickly gaining momentum across numerous research fields. The founding principles of circular economies lie in a different perspective on, and management of, resources under the idea that an ever-growing economic development and profitability can happen without an ever-growing pressure on the environment. As such, the built environment has a lot to contribute, being the sector with the greatest environmental impacts. However, the few existing cases of current research in the built environment from a circular economy perspective seem to have just replaced the 3R principle (reduce, reuse, recycle) with the new ‘buzz-word’. In this paper, we argue that a significantly different research approach is necessary if the circular economy is to keep up to its promise of being a new paradigm for sustainability. We therefore propose a framework to formulate building research from within a circular economy perspective. The framework is built around six pillars and acknowledges the key role of interdisciplinary research and that of both bottom-up and top-down initiatives to facilitate the transition to ‘circular’ buildings. Although theoretical in nature, the framework has been tested against current discourse about buildings and circular economies and it has proven a valuable tool to cluster existing initiatives and highlight missing interdisciplinary links. As such it can provide a valuable starting point to contribute to the theoretical foundations of building research from within the new paradigm of circular economies and also shape future research directions.

[1]  M. Braungart,et al.  The Next Industrial Revolution , 2017 .

[2]  S. Koh,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications $ , 2017 .

[3]  Tsuyoshi Fujita,et al.  Industrial and urban symbiosis in Japan: analysis of the Eco-Town Program 1997-2006. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems , 2016 .

[5]  Y. Kajikawa,et al.  Sustainability science: the changing landscape of sustainability research , 2014, Sustainability Science.

[6]  M. Fischer-Kowalski,et al.  Society's Metabolism , 1998 .

[7]  Ken Webster,et al.  What Might We Say about a Circular Economy? Some Temptations to Avoid if Possible , 2013 .

[8]  Bin Su,et al.  Exploring the critical factors and appropriate polices for reducing energy consumption of China's urban civil building sector , 2015 .

[9]  M. S. Andersen An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy , 2007 .

[10]  Wang Fengqi,et al.  Circular Economy Development Mode Based on System Theory , 2007 .

[11]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment - What does the evidence say? , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Terence Tse,et al.  Is the Circular Economy a New Fast‐Expanding Market? , 2017 .

[13]  Yunmin Chen,et al.  A circular economy model of economic growth , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Buick Davison,et al.  Design for deconstruction and material reuse , 2011 .

[15]  Jian Zhong Chen Material flow and circular economy , 2009 .

[16]  Paul T Anastas,et al.  Applying the principles of Green Engineering to cradle-to-cradle design. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Mark Roseland,et al.  Dimensions of the eco-city , 1997 .

[18]  S. Sauvé,et al.  Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research , 2016 .

[19]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Quantifying sustainability: Resilience, efficiency and the return of information theory , 2009 .

[20]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Quantifying economic sustainability: Implications for free-enterprise theory, policy and practice , 2009 .

[21]  Michael Pawlyn,et al.  Biomimicry in Architecture , 2011 .

[22]  William McDonough,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things , 2002 .

[23]  Peter Lacy,et al.  Waste To Wealth: The Circular Economy Advantage By Peter Lacy;Jakob Rutqvist , 2015 .

[24]  Christopher Tweed,et al.  SOLID WALL INSULATION RETROFIT IN UK DWELLINGS: CRITICAL FACTORS AFFECTING MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY , 2014 .

[25]  C. Zimring,et al.  Post-Occupancy Evaluation , 1980 .

[26]  P. Lacy,et al.  Waste to Wealth: The Circular Economy Advantage , 2015 .

[27]  R. Wever,et al.  Designing cradle-to-cradle products: a reality check , 2010 .

[28]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment in the Built Environment , 2011 .

[29]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  An Investigation into GHG and non‐GHG Impacts of Double Skin Façades in Office Refurbishments , 2016 .

[30]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Biomimetics: lessons from nature–an overview , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[31]  Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen,et al.  The Steady State and Ecological Salvation: A Thermodynamic Analysis , 1977 .

[32]  J. Naustdalslid Circular economy in China – the environmental dimension of the harmonious society , 2014 .

[33]  Y. Geng,et al.  Developing the circular economy in China: Challenges and opportunities for achieving 'leapfrog development' , 2008 .

[34]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  How Many Environmental Impact Indicators Are Needed in the Evaluation of Product Life Cycles? , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  M. Braungart,et al.  Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions - a strategy for eco-effective product and system design , 2007 .

[36]  Kathryn B. Janda,et al.  Buildings don't use energy: people do , 2011 .

[37]  C. Kerschner,et al.  Economic de-growth vs. steady-state economy , 2010 .

[38]  M. Braungart,et al.  The Upcycle: Beyond Sustainability--Designing for Abundance , 2013 .

[39]  N. E. Gallopoulos,et al.  Strategies for Manufacturing , 1989 .

[40]  M. Crang,et al.  Interrogating the circular economy: the moral economy of resource recovery in the EU , 2015 .

[41]  R. Dolby,et al.  Sociology of Knowledge in Natural Science , 1971 .