Identification of Multiscale Spatial Structure of Lunar Impact Crater: A Semivariogram Approach

Identifying the spatial structure of lunar impact craters is necessary to increase our understanding of past geologic processes on the Moon. However, detecting multiscale spatial structures of craters in images in appropriate resolutions using optimum scale parameters has not been quantified. This article presents a semivariogram approach for this purpose. The range of the semivariogram model represents the minimum average size of the crater type detected in an image of a spatial resolution. The feature lag distances of the semivariogram model indicate that a series of appropriate spatial resolutions rather than a single spatial resolution are required to address multiscale lunar impact crater structures. The optimum scale parameters for delineating multiscale crater structures in segmentation are constrained by the range and feature lag distances derived from semivariogram of the corresponding image in a certain spatial resolution. This article fills the gap in quantifying multiscale spatial structure of impact craters using semivariogram analysis for optimizing object-based crater mapping.

[1]  Chenghu Zhou,et al.  Automatic mapping of lunar landforms using DEM-derived geomorphometric parameters , 2017, Journal of Geographical Sciences.

[2]  Stuart R. Phinn,et al.  Assessment of mangrove spatial structure using high-spatial resolution image data , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS.

[3]  Dongping Ming,et al.  Semivariogram-Based Spatial Bandwidth Selection for Remote Sensing Image Segmentation With Mean-Shift Algorithm , 2012, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[4]  John W. Keller,et al.  Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO): Observations for Lunar Exploration and Science , 2010 .

[5]  I. Willis,et al.  A semi-automated method for mapping glacial geomorphology tested at Breiðamerkurjökull, Iceland , 2015 .

[6]  J. C. McGrew,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Problem Solving in Geography , 1993 .

[7]  Joseph Paul Cohen Automated crater detection using machine learning , 2016 .

[8]  J. Head,et al.  Erosional modification and gully formation at Meteor Crater, Arizona: Insights into crater degradation processes on Mars , 2010 .

[9]  Chenghu Zhou,et al.  A new insight into land use classification based on aggregated mobile phone data , 2013, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Simulated Annealing With Variogram-Based Optimization to Quantify Spatial Patterns of Trees Extracted From High-Resolution Images , 2016, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[11]  J. Carr,et al.  Semivariogram textural classification of JERS-1 (Fuyo-1) SAR data obtained over a flooded area of the Amazon rainforest , 1998 .

[12]  A. McEwen,et al.  Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Instrument Overview , 2010 .

[13]  Martin Volk,et al.  The comparison index: A tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation , 2007, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[14]  A. S. Kiran Kumar,et al.  Gullies and landslides on the Moon: Evidence for dry‐granular flows , 2013 .

[15]  Chaogui Kang,et al.  Incorporating spatial interaction patterns in classifying and understanding urban land use , 2016, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  R. Herrick,et al.  Geologic Analyses of the Causes of Morphological Variations in Lunar Craters Within the Simple‐to‐Complex Transition , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets.

[17]  Ugur Avdan,et al.  Mapping of shallow landslides with object-based image analysis from unmanned aerial vehicle data , 2019, Engineering Geology.

[18]  G. Matheron Principles of geostatistics , 1963 .

[19]  K. Vinod Kumar,et al.  An object-based classification method for automatic detection of lunar impact craters from topographic data , 2016 .

[20]  M. Chica-Olmo,et al.  Variographic analysis of tropical forest cover from multi-scale remotely sensed imagery , 2004 .

[21]  Adriaan van Niekerk,et al.  Object-based land surface segmentation scale optimisation: An ill-structured problem , 2019, Geomorphology.

[22]  Yuhong He,et al.  Detecting grassland spatial variation by a wavelet approach , 2007 .

[23]  Hanqing Zhao,et al.  Extraction of Terraces on the Loess Plateau from High-Resolution DEMs and Imagery Utilizing Object-Based Image Analysis , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[24]  Philip J. Howarth,et al.  High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Data for Forest Ecosystem Classification: An Examination of Spatial Scale , 2000 .

[25]  Bo-Hui Tang,et al.  Spatial upscaling of remotely sensed leaf area index based on discrete wavelet transform , 2018 .

[26]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[27]  Zongxu Pan,et al.  Achieving Super-Resolution Remote Sensing Images via the Wavelet Transform Combined With the Recursive Res-Net , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  N. A. C. Muñoz,et al.  ACCURACY AND SPATIAL VARIABILITY IN GPS SURVEYING FOR LANDSLIDE MAPPING ON ROAD INVENTORIES AT A SEMI-DETAILED SCALE: THE CASE IN COLOMBIA , 2016 .

[29]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  Xulin Guo,et al.  Detecting an Optimal Scale Parameter in Object-Oriented Classification , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Herman H. Shugart,et al.  Semivariograms from a forest transect gap model compared with remotely sensed data , 1992 .

[32]  Dongmei Chen,et al.  Segmentation for Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA): A review of algorithms and challenges from remote sensing perspective , 2019, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[33]  Dongryeol Ryu,et al.  Multi‐scale spatial correlation and scaling behavior of surface soil moisture , 2006 .

[34]  Clemens Eisank,et al.  Local variance for multi-scale analysis in geomorphometry , 2011, Geomorphology.

[35]  Jing Wang,et al.  Quantifying and characterizing the dynamics of urban greenspace at the patch level: A new approach using object-based image analysis , 2018 .

[36]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Defining an optimal size of support for remote sensing investigations , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[37]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Spatial variation in land cover and choice of spatial resolution for remote sensing , 2004 .

[38]  Xi-sheng Hu,et al.  Spatial analysis of carbon storage density of mid-subtropical forests using geostatistics: a case study in Jiangle County, southeast China , 2018, Acta Geochimica.

[39]  D. Sims,et al.  Optimum pixel size for hyperspectral studies of ecosystem function in southern California chaparral and grassland , 2003 .

[40]  Dylan S. Davis Object‐based image analysis: a review of developments and future directions of automated feature detection in landscape archaeology , 2018, Archaeological Prospection.

[41]  Christopher Lee,et al.  Automated crater detection on Mars using deep learning , 2019, Planetary and Space Science.

[42]  T. F. Stepinski,et al.  AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF SUB-KM CRATERS USING SHAPE AND TEXTURE INFORMATION. L. Bandeira , 2010 .

[43]  Danyang Liu,et al.  Boundary Detection of Dispersal Impact Craters Based on Morphological Characteristics Using Lunar Digital Elevation Model , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[44]  Stuart R. Phinn,et al.  Object-Based Approach for Multi-Scale Mangrove Composition Mapping Using Multi-Resolution Image Datasets , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[45]  R. Webster,et al.  Improved estimation of micro nutrients in hectare plots of the Sonning Series , 1984 .

[46]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Spatial dependence and classification of the soil along a transect in northeast Scotland , 1981 .

[47]  M. A. Oliver,et al.  Semi‐variograms for modelling the spatial pattern of landform and soil properties , 1986 .

[48]  Shuanggen Jin,et al.  New results and questions of lunar exploration from SELENE, Chang’E-1, Chandrayaan-1 and LRO/LCROSS , 2013 .

[49]  R. Platt,et al.  An Evaluation of an Object-Oriented Paradigm for Land Use/Land Cover Classification , 2008 .

[50]  Di Zhu,et al.  The Scale Effect on Spatial Interaction Patterns: An Empirical Study Using Taxi O-D data of Beijing and Shanghai , 2018, IEEE Access.

[51]  Jun Li,et al.  Lunar Crater Detection Based on Terrain Analysis and Mathematical Morphology Methods Using Digital Elevation Models , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[52]  B. A. Maurer,et al.  Multivariate correlations between imagery and field measurements across scales: comparing pixel aggregation and image segmentation , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[53]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Leveraging Machine Learning to Extend Ontology-Driven Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (O-GEOBIA): A Case Study in Forest-Type Mapping , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[54]  Ashbindu Singh,et al.  Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data , 2011 .

[55]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Using GIS in passive microwave soil moisture mapping and geostatistical analysis , 2002, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[56]  Wei Gao,et al.  Overall scheme and on-orbit images of Chang’E-2 lunar satellite CCD stereo camera , 2011 .

[57]  G. Mcgill Morphology of lunar craters - A test of lunar erosional models , 1974 .

[58]  Chaogui Kang,et al.  Social Sensing: A New Approach to Understanding Our Socioeconomic Environments , 2015 .

[59]  Chenghu Zhou,et al.  A Chang'E-1 global catalog of lunar impact craters , 2015 .

[60]  P. Curran The semivariogram in remote sensing: An introduction , 1988 .