Evaluation of rock mass engineering geological properties using statistical analysis and selecting proper tunnel design approach in Qazvin–Rasht railway tunnel

Abstract Various geological and geotechnical conditions at different project sites require different design, calculation and construction methods. Stability of underground openings depends on ground conditions with different modes of behavior. An essential step in the design procedure is to assess the ground behavior and continuity factor in the tunnel. The objective of this research is to give a methodology for selecting appropriate design approach based on ground behavior and continuity factor in tunnels. The common procedure for determining rock mass properties and in situ stresses are empirical methods, back analysis, field tests and mathematical modeling. In most cases, estimation of rock mass parameters and in situ stresses using empirical methods are not accurate enough. Therefore, rock mass properties are estimated using several empirical equations and statistical analysis were performed to estimation of these properties in order to obtain rational and reasonable results with acceptable accuracy. The Qazvin–Rasht railway tunnel are taken as case study. Behavior types along the tunnel assessed as stable with the potential of discontinuity controlled block failure, several blocks irregular failure, shallow shear failure, plastic behavior (initial), swelling of certain rocks and water inflow. Therefore, appropriate approach for the tunnel support design selected based on classification systems, numerical modelling, observation methods, and engineering judgment. In order to evaluation of tunnel stability, necessary support types and categories RMR, Q, support weight and SRC were employed as empirical tunnel support design methods. The performances of the proposed support systems were analyzed and verified by means of numerical analysis. According to results of empirical and numerical methods and engineering judgment, shotcrete 0.15–0.2 m with wire mesh and light ribs steel sets (IPE160) were proposed as support elements for the tunnel. We found that using proposed approach the optimum support system could be designed.

[1]  Hakan Basarir,et al.  Engineering geological studies and tunnel support design at Sulakyurt dam site, Turkey , 2006 .

[2]  A. I. Sofianos,et al.  Extending the Q system's prediction of support in tunnels employing fuzzy logic and extra parameters , 2006 .

[3]  Aydın Özsan,et al.  Analysis of support requirements for a shallow diversion tunnel at Guledar dam site, Turkey , 2005 .

[4]  Rajinder Bhasin,et al.  The use of stress-strength relationships in the assessment of tunnel stability , 1996 .

[5]  Claudio Oggeri,et al.  Tunnel static behavior assessed by a probabilistic approach to the back-analysis , 2012 .

[6]  E. T. Brown Rock characterization, testing & monitoring: ISRM suggested methods , 1981 .

[7]  Pranshoo Solanki,et al.  Empirical and numerical analyses of support requirements for a diversion tunnel at the Boztepe dam site, eastern Turkey , 2007 .

[8]  T. Ramamurthy,et al.  Shear strength response of some geological materials in triaxial compression , 2001 .

[9]  M. Barbero,et al.  Quarry-Induced Slope Instability at a Broadcasting Transmission Plant near Valcava, Lombardia, Italy , 2011 .

[10]  Håkan Stille,et al.  Ground behaviour and rock engineering tools for underground excavations , 2007 .

[11]  Z. Bieniawski Determining rock mass deformability: experience from case histories , 1978 .

[12]  Daniele Peila,et al.  Numerical modelling of ground-tunnel support interaction using bedded-beam-spring model with fuzzy parameters , 2011 .

[13]  Arild Palmström Recent developments in rock support estimates by the RMi , 2000 .

[14]  E. Hoek,et al.  Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus , 2006 .

[15]  Hakan Basarir,et al.  Engineering geological appraisal of the rock masses and preliminary support design, Dorukhan Tunnel, Zonguldak, Turkey , 2007 .

[16]  Daniele Peila,et al.  Influence of the Tunnel Shape on Shotcrete Lining Stresses , 2012, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[17]  T. Ramamurthy A geo-engineering classification for rocks and rock masses , 2004 .

[18]  A. Karakas Practical Rock Engineering , 2008 .

[19]  Nick Barton,et al.  Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterisation and tunnel design , 2002 .

[20]  P. R. Sheorey Empirical Rock Failure Criteria , 1997 .

[21]  Evert Hoek,et al.  HOEK-BROWN FAILURE CRITERION - 2002 EDITION , 2002 .

[22]  E. T. Brown,et al.  Underground excavations in rock , 1980 .

[23]  A. Paşamehmetoğlu,et al.  Proposed support design, Kaletepe tunnel, Turkey , 2004 .

[24]  N. D. Perrin,et al.  Applicability of the Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion to New Zealand Greywacke Rocks , 1999 .

[25]  L. G. D. Vallejo SRC rock mass classification of tunnels under high tectonic stress excavated in weak rocks , 2003 .

[26]  Manoj Kumar Verman ROCK MASS-TUNNEL SUPPORT INTERACTION ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[27]  Yudhbir,et al.  An Empirical Failure Criterion For Rock Masses , 1983 .

[28]  Arild Palmström,et al.  Characterizing rock masses by the RMi for use in practical rock engineering: Part 1: The development of the Rock Mass index (RMi) , 1996 .

[29]  P. R. Sheorey,et al.  Influence of elastic constants on the horizontal in situ stress , 2001 .

[30]  N. K. Samadhiya,et al.  Rock mass strength parameters mobilised in tunnels , 1997 .

[31]  John A. Hudson,et al.  Updated flowcharts for rock mechanics modelling and rock engineering design , 2007 .

[32]  N Kumar,et al.  IN SITU STRESS MEASUREMENT AND ITS APPLICATION FOR HYDRO-ELECTRIC PROJECTS—AN INDIAN EXPERIENCE IN THE HIMALAYAS , 2004 .

[33]  Evert Hoek,et al.  Practical estimates of rock mass strength , 1997 .

[34]  E. T. Brown,et al.  Rock characterization testing and monitoring , 1981 .

[35]  P. R. Sheorey A theory for In Situ stresses in isotropic and transverseley isotropic rock , 1994 .