Dynamic 3D simulations of earthquakes on En Echelon Faults

One of the mysteries of earthquake mechanics is why earthquakes stop. This process determines the difference between small and devastating ruptures. One possibility is that fault geometry controls earthquake size. We test this hypothesis using a numerical algorithm that simulates spontaneous rupture propagation in a three-dimensional medium and apply our knowledge to two California fault zones. We find that the size difference between the 1934 and 1966 Parkfield, California, earthquakes may be the product of a stepover at the southern end of the 1934 earthquake and show how the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake followed physically reasonable expectations when it jumped across en echelon faults to become a large event. If there are no linking structures, such as transfer faults, then strike-slip earthquakes are unlikely to propagate through stepover s >5 km wide.

[1]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Effects of a low-velocity zone on a dynamic rupture , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  T. D. Rubin,et al.  Relationship of the kickapoo fault to the Johnson Valley and Homestead Valley faults, San Bernardino County, California , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  S. T. Harding,et al.  Shallow structure and deformation along the San Andreas fault in Cholame Valley, California, based on high-resolution reflection profiling , 1990 .

[4]  Jerome A. Treiman,et al.  Near-Field Investigations of the Landers Earthquake Sequence, April to July 1992 , 1993, Science.

[5]  A. Michael,et al.  Three‐dimensional velocity structure, seismicity, and fault structure in the Parkfield Region, central California , 1993 .

[6]  A. Michael,et al.  Relations Among Fault Behavior, Subsurface Geology, and Three-Dimensional Velocity Models , 1991, Science.

[7]  H. Quin.  Dynamic stress drop and rupture dynamics of the October 15, 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1990 .

[8]  M. Takeo,et al.  Determination of constitutive relations of fault slip based on seismic wave analysis , 1997 .

[9]  R. Sibson.  Stopping of earthquake ruptures at dilational fault jogs , 1985, Nature.

[10]  S. Day.  Three-dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: The effect of nonuniform prestress , 1982, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  A. Barka,et al.  Strike‐slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity , 1988 .

[12]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Fault steps and the dynamic rupture process: 2-D numerical simulations of a spontaneously propagating shear fracture , 1991 .

[13]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  Short slip duration in dynamic rupture in the presence of heterogeneous fault properties , 1996 .

[14]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Rupture velocity of plane strain shear cracks , 1976 .

[15]  W. Ellsworth,et al.  Seismic Evidence for an Earthquake Nucleation Phase , 1995, Science.

[16]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Wrinkle-like slip pulse on a fault between different , 1997 .

[17]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Rupture propagation with finite stress in antiplane strain , 1976 .

[18]  J. Dieterich.  Potential for geophysical experiments in large scale tests , 1981 .

[19]  Paul Segall,et al.  Mechanics of discontinuous faults , 1980 .

[20]  David D. Jackson,et al.  Seismic hazards in southern California: probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024 , 1996 .

[21]  D. P. Schwartz,et al.  Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas Fault Zones , 1984 .

[22]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Dynamics of fault interaction: parallel strike‐slip faults , 1993 .

[23]  G. Beroza,et al.  Deep structure of a fault discontinuity , 1999 .

[24]  E. Hauksson,et al.  The 1992 Landers Earthquake Sequence: Seismological observations , 1993 .

[25]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Travel‐time tomography in the northern Coachella Valley using aftershocks of the 1986 ML 5.9 North Palm Springs Earthquake , 1992 .

[26]  GEOFFREY KING,et al.  Role of Fault Bends in the Initiation and Termination of Earthquake Rupture , 1985, Science.

[27]  C. Scholz.  The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting , 1990 .

[28]  Steven G. Wesnousky,et al.  Earthquakes, quaternary faults, and seismic hazard in California , 1986 .

[29]  Yoshiaki Ida,et al.  Cohesive force across the tip of a longitudinal‐shear crack and Griffith's specific surface energy , 1972 .

[30]  David J. Wald,et al.  Dynamic stress changes during earthquake rupture , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[31]  Kerry E Sieh,et al.  The transfer of slip between two en echelon strike‐slip faults: A case study from the 1992 Landers earthquake, southern California , 1995 .

[32]  Yijun Du,et al.  How similar were the 1934 and 1966 Parkfield Earthquakes , 1993 .

[33]  D. Wald,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[34]  William H. K. Lee,et al.  Fine Structure of the Landers Fault Zone: Segmentation and the Rupture Process , 1994, Science.

[35]  Michel Bouchon,et al.  Propagation of a shear crack on a nonplanar fault: A method of calculation , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[36]  Steven G. Wesnousky,et al.  Seismological and structural evolution of strike-slip faults , 1988, Nature.

[37]  Robert E. Wallace,et al.  Earthquake Recurrence Intervals on the San Andreas Fault , 1970 .