An analytical optimization of thermal energy storage for electricity cost reduction in solar thermal electric plants

Solar Thermal Electric (STE) plants can integrate Thermal Energy Storage (TES) in order to generate electricity when the energy source (Sun radiation) has vanished. TES technology has become a very important asset for this type of renewable energy source, but it has induced a rise in electricity cost in many cases. One of the reasons is the need of larger solar fields as the TES capacity increases because the solar field has to provide thermal power both to generate electricity and to charge the storage. The economic effects of improving the plant performance seem to have some internal complexities that must be investigated covering the internal relations among the main parts of a STE plant: the solar field, the power block and the energy storage. This paper presents an analytical study of these relations aimed at deriving a better understanding of the cost/performance behavior of STE plants. As the power block is a mature and commercial technology with well-established efficiencies and specific costs (in $/W, for instance), it has been taken as the reference element in modelling the plant. The other parts of the plant, i.e., the solar field and the energy storage, have been characterized in cost and energy management by a set of high-level parameters. Of course, a coarse definition cannot give very accurate results for a specific design, but it can be the guideline for the selection and sizing of a plant. It is worth noting that each type of solar thermal power plant has a different parametric scenario, corresponding to its essential design window. In this paper, comparisons among plants with different parametric scenarios are restricted to one-axis concentration solar fields, where the coarse model is easily characterized. The results show that the optimum plant configuration, in terms of TES capacity and solar field size, depends on the solar field and TES costs relative to power block cost. Moreover, it is shown that some parametric scenarios always lead to an increase in the cost of electricity when the energy storage capacity is enlarged. On the contrary, parametric scenarios associated to cheaper solar fields yield a much better economic result when TES is embodied in the plant. Additionally, TES efficiency is also identified as a parameter with high impact in the performance of the whole system. This result seems obvious, but the model gives numerical values that can help to optimize the selection process in a project. For instance, it is assessed that the lower the TES efficiency, the greater the relevance of reducing solar field costs is in order to obtain low electricity generation costs. As a general conclusion, the model points out that Fresnel-type solar fields are much better suited than parabolic trough collectors for integrating thermal energy storage. This implies that Fresnel plants present a higher potential to cover the peaks of electricity demand, which results into bigger profits.

[1]  Roberto Grena,et al.  Solar linear Fresnel collector using molten nitrates as heat transfer fluid , 2011 .

[2]  María José Montes,et al.  A Quest to the Cheapest Method for Electricity Generation in Concentrating Solar Power Plants , 2015 .

[3]  Huili Zhang,et al.  Concentrated solar power plants: Review and design methodology , 2013 .

[4]  Henry Price,et al.  Reducing the Cost of Energy From Parabolic Trough Solar Power Plants , 2003 .

[5]  M. Berenguel,et al.  Thermo-economic design optimization of parabolic trough solar plants for industrial process heat applications with memetic algorithms , 2014 .

[6]  Jan Fabian Feldhoff,et al.  Energetic Comparison of Linear Fresnel and Parabolic Trough Collector Systems , 2012 .

[7]  Rubén Abbas,et al.  A coherent integration of design choices for advancing in solar thermal power , 2015 .

[8]  Felix Tellez,et al.  Central Receiver System Solar Power Plant Using Molten Salt as Heat Transfer Fluid , 2008 .

[9]  S. Licoccia,et al.  Techno-economic comparison between CSP plants presenting two different heat transfer fluids , 2016 .

[10]  Ulf Herrmann,et al.  Two-tank molten salt storage for parabolic trough solar power plants , 2004 .

[11]  Rubén Abbas,et al.  Fresnel-based modular solar fields for performance/cost optimization in solar thermal power plants: A comparison with parabolic trough collectors , 2015 .

[12]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  State of the art on high temperature thermal energy storage for power generation. Part 1—Concepts, materials and modellization , 2010 .

[13]  Parthiv Kurup,et al.  Parabolic Trough Collector Cost Update for the System Advisor Model (SAM) , 2015 .

[14]  Ulrich Fahl,et al.  Efficiency and costs of different concentrated solar power plant configurations for sites in Gauteng and the Northern Cape, South Africa , 2013 .

[15]  Francesco Casella,et al.  Design of CSP plants with optimally operated thermal storage , 2015 .

[16]  K. Nithyanandam,et al.  Cost and performance analysis of concentrating solar power systems with integrated latent thermal energy storage , 2014 .

[17]  Elias K. Stefanakos,et al.  Thermal energy storage technologies and systems for concentrating solar power plants , 2013 .

[18]  S. Stamataki,et al.  Introduction of a wind powered pumped storage system in the isolated insular power system of Karpathos-Kasos , 2012 .

[19]  M. Valdés,et al.  Solar multiple optimization for a solar-only thermal power plant, using oil as heat transfer fluid in the parabolic trough collectors , 2009 .

[20]  Norberto Fueyo,et al.  Analysis of CSP plants for the definition of energy policies: The influence on electricity cost of solar multiples, capacity factors and energy storage , 2010 .

[21]  Bandar Jubran Alqahtani,et al.  Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants: Paving the Way for Thermal Solar , 2016 .

[22]  A. Inés Fernández,et al.  Molten salt facilities, lessons learnt at pilot plant scale to guarantee commercial plants; heat losses evaluation and correction , 2016 .

[23]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Economic implications of thermal energy storage for concentrated solar thermal power , 2011 .

[24]  G. Aneiros,et al.  Short-term forecast of daily curves of electricity demand and price , 2016 .

[25]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Enabling Greater Penetration of Solar Power via the Use of CSP with Thermal Energy Storage , 2011 .

[26]  Rhys Jacob,et al.  Review on concentrating solar power plants and new developments in high temperature thermal energy storage technologies , 2016 .

[27]  Craig Turchi,et al.  Thermal Energy Storage Performance Metrics and Use in Thermal Energy Storage Design , 2012 .

[28]  J. Pacheco,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A MOLTEN-SALT THERMOCLINE THERMAL STORAGE SYSTEM FOR PARABOLIC TROUGH PLANTS , 2001 .

[29]  K. C. Lewis,et al.  Forgotten Merits of the Analytic Viewpoint , 2013 .

[30]  P. Eames,et al.  Thermal energy storage for low and medium temperature applications using phase change materials – A review , 2016 .

[31]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Development Steps for Parabolic Trough Solar Power Technologies With Maximum Impact on Cost Reduction , 2007 .

[32]  I. García,et al.  Performance model for parabolic trough solar thermal power plants with thermal storage: Comparison to operating plant data , 2011 .

[33]  P. Denholm,et al.  The Value of Concentrating Solar Power and Thermal Energy Storage , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[34]  G. Morin,et al.  Comparison of Linear Fresnel and Parabolic Trough Collector power plants , 2012 .

[35]  Peiwen Li,et al.  Application of phase change materials for thermal energy storage in concentrated solar thermal power plants: A review to recent developments , 2015 .