First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity

How does prior experience influence team creativity? We address this question by examining the effects of task experience acquired directly and task experience acquired vicariously from others on team creativity in a product-development task. Across three laboratory studies, we find that direct task experience leads to higher levels of team creativity and more divergent products than indirect task experience. Moreover, our results show that the difference in team creativity between direct and indirect task experience persists over time. Finally, our findings demonstrate that transactive memory systems fully mediate the effect of direct task experience on team creativity. Teams who acquired task experience directly are more creative because they develop better transactive memory systems than teams who acquired experience vicariously. We discuss how our findings contribute to understanding the effects of prior experience on team creativity, and the role of transactive memory systems in creative tasks.

[1]  Henrik Bresman,et al.  External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[2]  L. Argote,et al.  When and Why Prior Task Experience Fosters Team Creativity , 2009 .

[3]  R. Moreland Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , 1999 .

[4]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[5]  J. March,et al.  Organizational Learning , 2008 .

[6]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[7]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[8]  J. Levine,et al.  Shared Cognition in-Organizations: The Management of Knowledge , 1999 .

[9]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[10]  G. Pisano Knowledge Integration and the Locus of Learning: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[11]  Jerker Denrell Vicarious Learning, Undersampling of Failure, and the Myths of Management , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[12]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[13]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  A. Hollingshead Perceptions of Expertise and Transactive Memory in Work Relationships , 2000 .

[15]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[16]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[17]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[18]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Team learning: collectively connecting the dots. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[20]  J. McGrath,et al.  Time and human interaction : toward a social psychology of time , 1986 .

[21]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[22]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[23]  Brian J. Fifarek,et al.  Offshoring technology innovation: A case study of rare-earth technology , 2008 .

[24]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. , 1995 .

[25]  J. McGrath,et al.  TIME MATTERS IN TEAM PERFORMANCE: EFFECTS OF MEMBER FAMILIARITY, ENTRAINMENT, AND TASK DISCONTINUITY ON SPEED AND QUALITY , 2003 .

[26]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Transactive Memory: When Is It More Beneficial to Know What Others Know? , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[27]  M. Gordon,et al.  The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .

[28]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[29]  C. Gibson From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: cycles of collective cognition in work groups , 2001 .

[30]  John R. Austin Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  S. Thompson Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[33]  N. Venkat Venkatraman,et al.  Offshoring Without Guilt , 2004 .

[34]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[35]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  B. Mullen,et al.  Theories of group behavior , 1987 .

[37]  P. Bliese Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation , 1998 .

[38]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. , 1997 .

[39]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[40]  J. McGrath,et al.  The Social Psychology of Time: New Perspectives , 1988 .

[41]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Communication and Motivational Predictors of the Dynamics of Organizational Innovation , 1992 .

[42]  S. Taggar Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model , 2002 .

[43]  L. Thompson,et al.  Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity , 2005 .

[44]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[45]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Template Use and the Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Aaron M. Brower,et al.  What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups , 1996 .

[47]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[48]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[49]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[50]  Ronald Mascitelli From Experience: Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achieve Breakthrough Innovation , 2000 .

[51]  Linda Argote,et al.  Group Learning Curves: The Effects of Turnover and Task Complexity on Group Performance1 , 1995 .

[52]  F. Liu,et al.  Product development performance measures in manufacturing firm , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[53]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Entrainment of Creativity in Small Groups , 1993 .

[54]  W. Bean On experience , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[55]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems, Learning, and Learning Transfer , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[56]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[57]  Janice R. Kelly,et al.  Capacity and Capability , 1990 .

[58]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[59]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  Focusing on Midpoint Transitions: An Analysis of Boundary Conditions , 2002 .

[60]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge ☆ , 2007 .

[61]  Kyle Lewis Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[62]  Gabriel Szulanski The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[63]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Evidence to Support the Componential Model of Creativity: Secondary Analyses of Three Studies , 1996 .

[64]  A. Hollingshead Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems , 1998 .

[65]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[66]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[67]  野中 郁次郎 Knowledge management : critical perspectives on business and management , 2005 .

[68]  Chen Shao-mi,et al.  On Group- learning , 2005 .

[69]  Dennis J. Devine,et al.  Teams in Organizations , 1999 .

[70]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Do friends perform better than acquaintances? the interaction of friendship, conflict, and task , 1993 .

[71]  M. Sobel Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[72]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality , 2005 .

[73]  杨文秀,et al.  此处“personality”译法探析 , 2000 .

[74]  K. Jehn,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS AND TASK PERFORMANCE: AN EXAMINATION OF MEDIATING PROCESSES IN FRIENDSHIP AND ACQUAINTANCE GROUPS. , 1996 .

[75]  P. Bliese Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[76]  B. Tuckman DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[77]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[78]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[79]  D. Leonard,et al.  The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , 1998 .

[80]  Christina E. Shalley,et al.  Effects of Productivity Goals, Creativity Goals, and Personal Discretion on Individual Creativity , 1991 .

[81]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[82]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[83]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. , 2006 .

[84]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[85]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group learning in organizations. , 2001 .

[86]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[87]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. , 1997 .

[88]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Looking Inside the Fishbowl of Creativity: Verbal and Behavioral Predictors of Creative Performance , 1998 .

[89]  Ronald G. Stansfield,et al.  Sociological Methodology 1982 , 1983 .

[90]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR CONDUCTING MULTI-LEVEL CONSTRUCT VALIDATION , 2005 .

[91]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[92]  Eric F. Rietzschel,et al.  Research on managing groups and teams: creativity in groups , 2009 .

[93]  Henrik Bresman A Multi-Method Field Study of External Team Learning Activities and Performance. , 2008 .

[94]  A. Bandura Principles of behavior modification , 1969 .

[95]  Linda Argote,et al.  Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. , 1996 .

[96]  L. James Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[97]  P. Kim When What You KnowCanHurt You: A Study of Experiential Effects on Group Discussion and Performance , 1997 .

[98]  D. Wegner A Computer Network Model of Human Transactive Memory , 1995 .