Optimal number of atlases and label fusion for automatic multi-atlas-based brachial plexus contouring in radiotherapy treatment planning

BackgroundThe present study aimed to define the optimal number of atlases for automatic multi-atlas-based brachial plexus (BP) segmentation and to compare Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) label fusion with Patch label fusion using the ADMIRE® software. The accuracy of the autosegmentations was measured by comparing all of the generated autosegmentations with the anatomically validated gold standard segmentations that were developed using cadavers.Materials and methodsTwelve cadaver computed tomography (CT) atlases were used for automatic multi-atlas-based segmentation. To determine the optimal number of atlases, one atlas was selected as a patient and the 11 remaining atlases were registered onto this patient using a deformable image registration algorithm. Next, label fusion was performed by using every possible combination of 2 to 11 atlases, once using STAPLE and once using Patch. This procedure was repeated for every atlas as a patient.The similarity of the generated automatic BP segmentations and the gold standard segmentation was measured by calculating the average Dice similarity (DSC), Jaccard (JI) and True positive rate (TPR) for each number of atlases. These similarity indices were compared for the different number of atlases using an equivalence trial and for the two label fusion groups using an independent sample-t test.ResultsDSC’s and JI’s were highest when using nine atlases with both STAPLE (average DSC = 0,532; JI = 0,369) and Patch (average DSC = 0,530; JI = 0,370). When comparing both label fusion algorithms using 9 atlases for both, DSC and JI values were not significantly different. However, significantly higher TPR values were achieved in favour of STAPLE (p < 0,001). When fewer than four atlases were used, STAPLE produced significantly lower DSC, JI and TPR values than did Patch (p = 0,0048).ConclusionsUsing 9 atlases with STAPLE label fusion resulted in the most accurate BP autosegmentations (average DSC = 0,532; JI = 0,369 and TPR = 0,760). Only when using fewer than four atlases did the Patch label fusion results in a significantly more accurate autosegmentation than STAPLE.

[1]  Soyeon Ahn,et al.  How to demonstrate similarity by using noninferiority and equivalence statistical testing in radiology research. , 2013, Radiology.

[2]  Benjamin Movsas,et al.  Consideration of dose limits for organs at risk of thoracic radiotherapy: atlas for lung, proximal bronchial tree, esophagus, spinal cord, ribs, and brachial plexus. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  Evaluation of automatic atlas-based lymph node segmentation for head-and-neck cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[5]  X Han.  WE-E-213CD-06: A Locally Adaptive, Intensity-Based Label Fusion Method for Multi- Atlas Auto-Segmentation. , 2012, Medical physics.

[6]  A Nelson,et al.  SU-E-J-106: Atlas-Based Segmentation: Evaluation of a Multi-Atlas Approach for Lung Cancer. , 2012, Medical physics.

[7]  L. Beckett,et al.  Brachial plexus-associated neuropathy after high-dose radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  J. Piper,et al.  Atlas-based Segmentation: Evaluation of a Multi-atlas Approach for Prostate Cancer , 2012 .

[9]  William M. Wells,et al.  Validation of image segmentation by estimating rater bias and variance , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  T. Vercauteren,et al.  An anatomically validated brachial plexus contouring method for intensity modulated radiation therapy planning. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  A. Luini,et al.  Intraoperative radiotherapy versus external radiotherapy for early breast cancer (ELIOT): a randomised controlled equivalence trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  W. Thiel,et al.  Die Konservierung ganzer Leichen in natürlichen Farben , 1992 .

[13]  T. Vercauteren,et al.  Morphometric Atlas Selection for Automatic Brachial Plexus Segmentation. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Joris Van de Velde Msc,et al.  Reliability and accuracy assessment of radiation therapy oncology group-endorsed guidelines for brachial plexus contouring , 2014, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[15]  Laurence Court,et al.  Automatic contouring of brachial plexus using a multi-atlas approach for lung cancer radiation therapy. , 2013, Practical radiation oncology.

[16]  Nicholas Slevin,et al.  Evaluation of an automatic segmentation algorithm for definition of head and neck organs at risk , 2014, Radiation oncology.

[17]  H. Thierens,et al.  Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study. , 2012, Radiology.

[18]  E. R. van den Heuvel,et al.  3D Variation in delineation of head and neck organs at risk , 2012, Radiation oncology.

[19]  Frederik Wenz,et al.  Performance of an atlas-based autosegmentation software for delineation of target volumes for radiotherapy of breast and anorectal cancer. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  M. Stock,et al.  Assessment of accuracy and efficiency of atlas-based autosegmentation for prostate radiotherapy in a variety of clinical conditions , 2012, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[21]  Srinivasan Vijayakumar,et al.  Development and validation of a standardized method for contouring the brachial plexus: preliminary dosimetric analysis among patients treated with IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: Application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[23]  Constraining the brachial plexus does not compromise regional control in oropharyngeal carcinoma , 2013, Radiation oncology.

[24]  G. Sharp,et al.  Vision 20/20: perspectives on automated image segmentation for radiotherapy. , 2014, Medical physics.

[25]  Fabrice Heitz,et al.  Retrospective evaluation of a topology preserving non-rigid registration method , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[26]  A. Lomax,et al.  Systematic evaluation of three different commercial software solutions for automatic segmentation for adaptive therapy in head-and-neck, prostate and pleural cancer , 2012, Radiation oncology.

[27]  Xiao Han,et al.  Clinical validation of atlas-based auto-segmentation of multiple target volumes and normal tissue (swallowing/mastication) structures in the head and neck. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.