Common spatial subspace decomposition applied to analysis of brain responses under multiple task conditions: a simulation study

A method, called common spatial subspace decomposition, is presented which can extract signal components specific to one condition from multiple magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography data sets of multiple task conditions. Signal matrices or covariance matrices are decomposed using spatial factors common to multiple conditions. The spatial factors and corresponding spatial filters are then dissociated into specific and common parts, according to the common spatial subspace which exists among the data sets. Finally, the specific signal components are extracted using the corresponding spatial filters and spatial factors. The relationship between this decomposition and spatio-temporal source models is described in this paper. Computer simulations suggest that this method can facilitate the analysis of brain responses under multiple task conditions and merits further application.

[1]  L. McEvoy,et al.  High resolution evoked potential imaging of the cortical dynamics of human working memory. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  K. Sasaki,et al.  Dynamic activities of the frontal association cortex in calculating and thinking , 1994, Neuroscience Research.

[3]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[4]  B. Hjorth An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Scherg,et al.  Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  M. Scherg,et al.  Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  C M Michel,et al.  Event-related potential maps depend on prestimulus brain electric microstate map. , 1994, The International journal of neuroscience.

[8]  R Srebro,et al.  Estimating cortical activity from VEPS with the shrinking ellipsoid inverse. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric fields of the brain , 1981 .

[10]  John S. George,et al.  MEG studies of human vision: Retinotopic organization of V1 , 1993 .

[11]  W Lang,et al.  Brain potentials with old/new distinction of non-words and geometric figures. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  S. Bressler,et al.  Event-related covariances during a bimanual visuomotor task. I. Methods and analysis of stimulus- and response-locked data. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  David Poeppel,et al.  MEG covariance difference analysis: Extraction of target source activities by using task and control measurements , 1997 .

[14]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[15]  A Urbano,et al.  A high resolution EEG method based on the correction of the surface Laplacian estimate for the subject's variable scalp thickness. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Z.J. Koles,et al.  Principal-component localization of the sources of the background EEG , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  J. Sarvas Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  C H Lücking,et al.  Topography and sources of electromagnetic cerebral responses to electrical and air-puff stimulation of the hand. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  Z J Koles,et al.  The quantitative extraction and topographic mapping of the abnormal components in the clinical EEG. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Scherg Fundamentals if dipole source potential analysis , 1990 .

[21]  P Berg,et al.  A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  J.C. Mosher,et al.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  J E Skinner,et al.  Chaotic brain activity. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.