Deterministic Communications for In-vehicle Network: Overview and Challenges

In recent years, intelligence has become an inevitable trend in the development of automobile industry, and advanced assistant driving or autonomous driving are important features of automobile intelligence. The increasing level of self-driving puts forward higher demands for in-vehicle communication. And traditional in-vehicle networks are difficult to cover a series of complex deterministic communication requirements including high-bandwidth, low latency, low jitter and zero congestion. Therefore, Automotive Ethernet technology came into being. IEEE developed a series of Time Sensitive Networks (TSN) standard protocols based on traditional Ethernet. TSN added a series of key mechanisms that provide realtime and reliability guarantees for data transmission. In this paper, we reviewed the evolution of in-vehicle networks and outlined the development of Time Triggered Ethernet (TTE) and TSN researches in recent years. We also discussed the importance of deterministic researches on in-vehicle networks and the challenges in the development of the Internet of Things, E/E (Electrical/Electronic) architectures, intelligent driving, and new energy vehicles.

[1]  Rolf Ernst,et al.  Formal worst-case timing analysis of Ethernet TSN's time-aware and peristaltic shapers , 2015, 2015 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[2]  Johan J. Lukkien,et al.  Analysis of Ethernet-switch traffic shapers for in-vehicle networking applications , 2015, 2015 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[3]  Jon Bell Network protocols used in the automotive industry , 2002 .

[4]  Markus Kucera,et al.  Automotive E/E-architecture enhancements by usage of ethernet TSN , 2017, 2017 13th Workshop on Intelligent Solutions in Embedded Systems (WISES).

[5]  Rolf Ernst,et al.  Formal worst-case timing analysis of Ethernet TSN's burst-limiting shaper , 2016, 2016 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[6]  Hermann Kopetz,et al.  TTP - A time-triggered protocol for fault-tolerant real-time systems , 1993, FTCS-23 The Twenty-Third International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing.

[7]  Robert Schwabel,et al.  Technical Challenges in Future Electrical Architectures , 2011 .

[8]  Jürgen Jasperneite,et al.  Analysis of realizing a future industrial network by means of Software-Defined Networking (SDN) , 2016, 2016 IEEE World Conference on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS).

[9]  Feng He,et al.  The research of scheduling algorithm for time-triggered ethernet based on path-hop , 2016, 2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[10]  Stefan Buschmann,et al.  Extending OMNeT++ Towards a Platform for the Design of Future In-Vehicle Network Architectures , 2016, ArXiv.

[11]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Ultra-Low Latency (ULL) Networks: The IEEE TSN and IETF DetNet Standards and Related 5G ULL Research , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Wilfried Steiner,et al.  An Evaluation of SMT-Based Schedule Synthesis for Time-Triggered Multi-hop Networks , 2010, 2010 31st IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium.

[13]  Xiong Hua-gang Research on Time-Triggerd-Ethernet Synchronization and Scheduling Mechanism , 2011 .

[14]  IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks--Audio Video Bridging (AVB) Systems , 2022 .

[15]  Florian Hartwich,et al.  Time Triggered CAN (TTCAN) , 2001 .

[16]  Rolf Ernst,et al.  Formal Timing Analysis of Full Duplex Switched Based Ethernet Network Architectures , 2010 .

[17]  Michael Glaß,et al.  Timing analysis of Ethernet AVB-based automotive E/E architectures , 2013, 2013 IEEE 18th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA).

[18]  Wolfgang Stolz,et al.  Ethernet and IP - The Solution to Master Complexity, Safety and Security in Vehicle Communication Networks? , 2011 .

[19]  Stephan Kehrer,et al.  A comparison of fault-tolerance concepts for IEEE 802.1 Time Sensitive Networks (TSN) , 2014, Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[20]  Thomas C. Schmidt,et al.  Comparing time-triggered Ethernet with FlexRay: An evaluation of competing approaches to real-time for in-vehicle networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems Proceedings.

[21]  Rolf Ernst,et al.  Formal worst-case timing analysis of Ethernet topologies with strict-priority and AVB switching , 2012, 7th IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES'12).

[22]  Wilfried Steiner Synthesis of Static Communication Schedules for Mixed-Criticality Systems , 2011, 2011 14th IEEE International Symposium on Object/Component/Service-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing Workshops.

[23]  Qiuxia Wang,et al.  SOC estimation algorithm of power lithium battery based on AFSA‐BP neural network , 2020, The Journal of Engineering.