The Influence of Reference Frame Selection on Spatial Template Construction

Abstract The use of spatial relational terms requires the selection of a reference frame and the construction of a spatial template. The reference frame divides up space, indicating above/below, front/back, and left/right directions. Spatial templates are applied to reference frames and define regions in space that correspond to good, acceptable, and bad uses of particular spatial relations. In two experiments we examined whether reference frame selection influences the spatial templates that are constructed for the spatial relations “above” and “below.” Results indicated two such influences, one operating across trials and one operating within a trial. Across trials, the preferences for using the different types of reference frames directly influenced the parsing of space, such that when multiple spatial templates were constructed, they were combined to form a composite template. Spatial templates constructed for the different reference frames were very similar, indicating that the type of reference frame did not alter the overall shape or relative sizes of the regions within the spatial template. Within a trial, the activation of multiple reference frames during reference frame selection resulted in the construction of multiple spatial templates, even when instructions were given to respond on the basis of a single reference frame.

[1]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  Design of Experiments , 1936 .

[2]  F. Attneave,et al.  Discriminability of stimuli varying in physical and retinal orientation , 1967 .

[3]  F. Attneave,et al.  Voluntary control of frame of reference and slope equivalence under head rotation. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  On the process of comparing sentences against pictures , 1972 .

[5]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[6]  M. Corballis,et al.  Mental rotation under head tilt: Factors influencing the location of the subjective reference frame , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  W. Levelt.  Cognitive styles in the use of spatial direction terms , 1982 .

[8]  Mark Steedman.  Speech, Place, and Action , 1982 .

[9]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  How Language Structures Space , 1983 .

[10]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Some Perceptual Limitations on Talking About Space , 1984 .

[11]  H. Pick,et al.  Spatial orientation : theory, research, and application , 1984 .

[12]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Limits in perception , 1984 .

[13]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[14]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes , 1988, Cognition.

[15]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Interpreting Words in Spatial Descriptions , 1988 .

[16]  A. Garnham.  A unified theory of the meaning of some spatial relational terms , 1989, Cognition.

[17]  Talking about Space , 1989 .

[18]  W. Levelt,et al.  Spatial reference in weightlessness: Perceptual factors and mental representations , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: Evidence from the neglect syndrome , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Claude Vandeloise,et al.  Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French , 1991 .

[22]  Donna Jo Napoli,et al.  Bridges Between Psychology And Linguistics: A Swarthmore Festschrift For Lila Gleitman , 1992 .

[23]  B. Tversky,et al.  Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes , 1992 .

[24]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? , 1993, Cognition.

[25]  M. F. Schober.  Spatial perspective-taking in conversation , 1993, Cognition.

[26]  B. Landau,et al.  “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .

[27]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Reference Frame Activation during Spatial Term Assignment , 1994 .

[28]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  G. Logan.  Linguistic and Conceptual Control of Visual Spatial Attention , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  M. Tarr,et al.  Spatial language and spatial representation , 1995, Cognition.

[31]  N. Franklin,et al.  Parsing surrounding space into regions , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Jodie M. Plumert,et al.  The Content and Organization of Communication about Object Locations , 1995 .

[33]  Terry Regier,et al.  The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism , 1996 .

[34]  Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky,et al.  The Influence of Functional Relations on Spatial Term Selection , 1996 .

[35]  G D Logan,et al.  Distance and distraction effects in the apprehension of spatial relations. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations , 1996 .

[37]  S. Levinson.  Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence , 1996 .

[38]  S. Levinson,et al.  LANGUAGE AND SPACE , 1996 .