Effects of Anti-Fatigue Mats on Perceived Discomfort and Weight-Shifting During Prolonged Standing

Objective: The aim of this experiment was to investigate the effects of anti-fatigue mats on perceived discomfort and behavioral responses (weight-shifting between the feet) during prolonged standing. Background: Prolonged standing is a common requirement in the workplace and is a well-known cause of discomfort. Anti-fatigue mats have been shown to reduce discomfort resulting from standing, but no study has identified a particular mat that performs better than others or examined the relationship between discomfort and weight-shifting. Methods: Participants stood for 4 hours on four commercially available “anti-fatigue” mats and a hard surface (control condition). Subjective ratings of discomfort were measured, and in-shoe pressure was recorded and used to evaluate weight-shifting during standing. Results: Compared to the control condition, after 4 hours of standing discomfort was reduced by three of the four mats, but discomfort ratings did not significantly differ among mats. However, significant differences among mats were found in the frequency of weight-shifting, and weight-shifting was positively correlated to discomfort. Conclusion: These results suggest that subjective reports of discomfort were not sufficiently sensitive to detect differences among mats for the experimental conditions tested. Behavioral responses, specifically weight-shifting between feet, may provide a more sensitive alternative to subjective reports.

[1]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[2]  T. V. Duggan.  Stress Analysis and Vibrations of Elastic Bodies , 1964 .

[3]  C R Brantingham,et al.  Enhanced venous pump activity as a result of standing on a varied terrain floor surface. , 1970, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[4]  George Brant Bridgman.  The Human Machine , 1972 .

[5]  E N Corlett,et al.  A technique for assessing postural discomfort. , 1976, Ergonomics.

[6]  D A Stubbs,et al.  Postural stress in geriatric nursing. , 1987, International journal of nursing studies.

[7]  Ryan Ga,et al.  The prevalence of musculo-skeletal symptoms in supermarket workers. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[8]  Stephan Konz,et al.  An Evaluation of Floor Surfaces , 1989 .

[9]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Constrained standing: Evaluating the foot/floor interface , 1991 .

[10]  W C Hutton,et al.  The effect of surgical floor mats in prolonged standing: an EMG study of the lumbar paraspinal and anterior tibialis muscles. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[11]  Mark S. Redfern,et al.  Influence of Flooring on Standing Fatigue , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[12]  K. Messing,et al.  The 120-S minute: using analysis of work activity to prevent psychological distress among elementary school teachers. , 1997, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[13]  M I Jayson,et al.  Employment and Physical Work Activities as Predictors of Future Low Back Pain , 1997, Spine.

[14]  Pascal Madeleine,et al.  Subjective, physiological and biomechanical responses to prolonged manual work performed standing on hard and soft surfaces , 1997, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[15]  K. Jørgensen,et al.  Significance of mat and shoe softness during prolonged work in upright position: based on measurements of low back muscle EMG, foot volume changes, discomfort and ground force reactions. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  Ravindra S. Goonetilleke,et al.  Designing to Miminize Discomfort , 1998 .

[17]  J. V. van Dieën,et al.  Evaluation of work-rest schedules with respect to the effects of postural workload in standing work. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[18]  H. Vrielink,et al.  Evaluation of work-rest schedules with respect to the effects of postural workload in standing work , 1998 .

[19]  Ravindra S. Goonetilleke,et al.  Footwear Cushioning: Relating Objective and Subjective Measurements , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[20]  F Tomei,et al.  Chronic venous disorders and occupation. , 1999, American journal of industrial medicine.

[21]  Peter A. Ciullo,et al.  The Rubber Formulary , 1999 .

[22]  F. Wolf,et al.  WORKING CONDITIONS AND ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOME: A META‐ANALYSIS , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  M S Redfern,et al.  The influence of flooring on standing comfort and fatigue. , 2000, AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[24]  V. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Influence of compression hosiery on physiological responses to standing fatigue in women. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  Mark S. Redfern,et al.  Effect of Flooring on Standing Comfort and Fatigue , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[26]  J. Hamill,et al.  Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[27]  Nicolas Vuillerme,et al.  Postural sway under muscle vibration and muscle fatigue in humans , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[28]  Phyllis M King,et al.  A comparison of the effects of floor mats and shoe in-soles on standing fatigue. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[29]  E. Capodaglio.  Comparison Between the CR10 Borg's Scale and the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) During an Arm-Cranking Exercise , 2001, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[30]  H. Knibbe,et al.  Prolonged standing in the OR: a Dutch research study. , 2007, AORN journal.

[31]  Jack P Callaghan,et al.  Prolonged standing as a precursor for the development of low back discomfort: an investigation of possible mechanisms. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[32]  R. Lericollais,et al.  TIME-OF-DAY EFFECTS ON FATIGUE DURING A SUSTAINED ANAEROBIC TEST IN WELL-TRAINED CYCLISTS , 2009, Chronobiology international.

[33]  P. Sharma.  Mechanics of materials. , 2010, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.