The Difficulty of Recognizing Grasps from sEMG during Activities of Daily Living

The application of machine learning to recognize hand movements from surface electromyography has led to promising academic results. Unfortunately, it has proven difficult to translate these results in better control methods for the end-users of upper-limb prostheses. Recent studies have pointed out that common offline performance metrics, such as classification accuracy, are not correlated with real controllability of the prosthesis. In this paper, we investigate the cause that learned models start to fail when applied outside the constrained laboratory setting. We performed several analyses at the hand of a dedicated data acquisition composed of a typical academic training session in the first phase and a set of activities of daily living in a home setting afterwards. Our analysis confirms that a model trained in the former setting performs poorly when applied in a home environment. The cause for this degradation is that the distribution of myoelectric data changes between both settings, thus violating the typical assumption in statistical learning theory that train and test data come from the same distribution. This problem persists even when adding data acquired in some home activities to classify others. Our result not only confirms the limited importance of offline performance metrics for real prosthesis usability, but also highlights the difficulties machine learning based approaches will need to overcome to become practically relevant.

[1]  A. Boschmann,et al.  Reducing the limb position effect in pattern recognition based myoelectric control using a high density electrode array , 2013, 2013 ISSNIP Biosignals and Biorobotics Conference: Biosignals and Robotics for Better and Safer Living (BRC).

[2]  Koby Crammer,et al.  Analysis of Representations for Domain Adaptation , 2006, NIPS.

[3]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  B. Hudgins,et al.  REAL-TIME MYOELECTRIC CONTROL IN A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT TO RELATE USABILITY VS. ACCURACY , 2005 .

[5]  Dario Farina,et al.  Effect of arm position on the prediction of kinematics from EMG in amputees , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[6]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  Dario Farina,et al.  Is Accurate Mapping of EMG Signals on Kinematics Needed for Precise Online Myoelectric Control? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Barbara Caputo,et al.  Megane Pro: Myo-electricity, visual and gaze tracking data acquisitions to improve hand prosthetics , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[10]  Sethu Vijayakumar,et al.  Improved prosthetic hand control with concurrent use of myoelectric and inertial measurements , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Zeng-Guang Hou,et al.  Combined use of sEMG and accelerometer in hand motion classification considering forearm rotation , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[12]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Electromyography data for non-invasive naturally-controlled robotic hand prostheses , 2014, Scientific Data.

[13]  Todd A Kuiken,et al.  Target Achievement Control Test: evaluating real-time myoelectric pattern-recognition control of multifunctional upper-limb prostheses. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  Jaime Valls Miró,et al.  Towards limb position invariant myoelectric pattern recognition using time-dependent spectral features , 2014, Neural Networks.

[15]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  B. Hudgins,et al.  A Real-Time Pattern Recognition Based Myoelectric Control Usability Study Implemented in a Virtual Environment , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Surface EMG in advanced hand prosthetics , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Dario Farina,et al.  A Multi-Class Proportional Myocontrol Algorithm for Upper Limb Prosthesis Control: Validation in Real-Life Scenarios on Amputees , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  BioPatRec: A modular research platform for the control of artificial limbs based on pattern recognition algorithms , 2013, Source Code for Biology and Medicine.

[20]  Dario Farina,et al.  Translating Research on Myoelectric Control into Clinics—Are the Performance Assessment Methods Adequate? , 2017, Front. Neurorobot..

[21]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Movement Error Rate for Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for sEMG-Based Hand Movement Classification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.