Investigating the impact of violations of the “left and top means first” heuristic on response behavior and data quality

ABSTRACT Web surveys are an established data collection mode that use written language to provide information. The written language is accompanied by visual elements, such as presentation formats and shapes. However, research has shown that visual elements influence response behavior because respondents sometimes use interpretive heuristics to make sense of the visual elements. One such heuristic is the ‘left and top means first’ (LTMF) heuristic, which suggests that respondents tend to believe that a response scale consistently runs from left to right or from top to bottom. We conducted a web survey experiment to investigate how violations of the LTMF heuristic affect response behavior and data quality. For this purpose, a random half of respondents received response options that followed a consistent order and the other half received response options that followed an inconsistent order. The results reveal significantly different response distributions between the two groups. We also found that inconsistently ordered response options significantly increase response times and decrease data quality in terms of criterion validity. We, therefore, recommend using options that follow the design strategies of the LTMF heuristic.

[1]  David S. Yeager,et al.  Does Mentioning “Some People” and “Other People” in an Opinion Question Improve Measurement Quality? , 2012 .

[2]  Jan Karem Höhne,et al.  Re-Examining the Middle Means Typical and the Left and Top Means First Heuristics Using Eye-Tracking Methodology , 2019, Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology.

[3]  A. Blom,et al.  Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General Population , 2015 .

[4]  F. Conrad,et al.  Spacing, Position, and Order Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey Questions , 2004 .

[5]  C. O. Mathews The effect of the order of printed response words on an interest questionnaire. , 1929 .

[6]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Violating conversational conventions disrupts cognitive processing of attitude questions , 2000 .

[7]  Vera Toepoel,et al.  How Visual Design Affects the Interpretability of Survey Questions , 2018, Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet.

[8]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Cognition and Communication: Judgmental Biases, Research Methods, and the Logic of Conversation , 2014 .

[9]  Vidal Díaz de Rada Igúzquiza,et al.  Internet, Phone, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Don A. Dillman, Jolene D. Smyth y Leah Melani Christian. (New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons, 2014) , 2016 .

[10]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  A. Kovaleva,et al.  Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung politischer Kompetenz- und Einflussüberzeugungen – Political Efficacy Kurzskala (PEKS) , 2012 .

[12]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines. , 1987 .

[13]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Cognitive aspects of survey methodology , 2007 .

[14]  M. Couper,et al.  Picture This!Exploring Visual Effects in Web Surveys , 2004 .