A Strategy For Modeling Ground Water Rebound In Abandoned Deep Mine Systems

Discharges of polluted water from abandoned mines are a major cause of degradation of water resources worldwide. Pollution arises after abandoned workings flood up to surface level, by the process termed ground water rebound. As flow in large, open mine voids is often turbulent, standard techniques for modeling ground water flow (which assume laminar flow) are inappropriate for predicting ground water rebound. More physically realistic models are therefore desirable, yet these are often expensive to apply to all but the smallest of systems. An overall strategy for ground water rebound modeling is proposed, with models of decreasing complexity applied as the temporal and spatial scales of the systems under analysis increase. For relatively modest systems (area < 200 km2), a physically based modeling approach has been developed, in which 3-D pipe networks (representing major mine roadways, etc.) are routed through a variably saturated, 3-D porous medium (representing the country rock). For systems extending more than 100 to 3000 km2, a semidistributed model (GRAM) has been developed, which conceptualizes extensively interconnected volumes of workings as ponds, which are connected to other ponds only at discrete overflow points, such as major inter-mine roadways, through which flow can be efficiently modeled using the Prandtl-Nikuradse pipe-flow formulation. At the very largest scales, simple water-balance calculations are probably as useful as any other approach, and a variety of proprietary codes may be used for the purpose.

[1]  K. Bradbury,et al.  Ground‐Water Flow Model of Drawdown and Recovery Near an Underground Mine , 1988 .

[2]  Paul L. Younger,et al.  ‘To Pump or Not to Pump’ Cost‐Benefit Analysis of Future Environmental Management Options for the Abandoned Durham Coalfield , 1995 .

[3]  P. Younger,et al.  Groundwater rebound in the South Yorkshire coalfield: a first approximation using the GRAM model , 2000, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.

[4]  A. Howard,et al.  Early Development of Karst Systems: 2. Turbulent Flow , 1995 .

[5]  P. Younger,et al.  Dominating Chemical Factors in Mine Water Induced Impoverishment of the Invertebrate Fauna of Two Streams in the Durham Coalfield, Uk , 1997 .

[6]  J. Sherwood Modelling minewater flow and quality changes after coalfield closure , 1997 .

[7]  Assaf P. Oron,et al.  Flow in rock fractures: The local cubic law assumption reexamined , 1998 .

[8]  Harihar Rajaram,et al.  Influence of aperture variability on dissolutional growth of fissures in Karst Formations , 1998 .

[9]  A. Howard,et al.  Early development of karst systems: 1. Preferential flow path enlargement under laminar flow , 1994 .

[10]  John Ewen,et al.  SHETRAN: Distributed River Basin Flow and Transport Modeling System , 2000 .

[11]  Paul L. Younger,et al.  Possible Environmental Impact of the Closure of Two Collieries in County Durham , 1993 .

[12]  M. Patricia Henton,et al.  The Problem of Water Table Rebound After Mining Activity and its Effect on Ground and Surface Water Quality , 1981 .

[13]  David Banks,et al.  Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly , 1997 .