Empirical Characterization of a High-performance Exterior-rotor Type Brushless DC Motor and Drive

Recently, brushless motors with especially high torque densities have been developed for applications in autonomous aerial vehicles (i.e. drones), which usually employ exterior rotortype geometries (ER-BLDC motors). These motors are promising for other applications, such as humanoids and wearable robots; however, the emerging companies that produce motors for drone applications do not typically provide adequate technical specifications that would permit their general use across robotics–for example, the specifications are often tested in unrealistic forced convection environments, or are drone-specific, such as thrust efficiency. Furthermore, the high magnetic pole count in many ER-BLDC motors restricts the brushless drives able to efficiently commutate these motors at speeds needed for lightly-geared operation. This paper provides an empirical characterization of a popular ER-BLDC motor and a new brushless drive, which includes efficiencies of the motor across different power regimes, identification of the motor transfer function coefficients, thermal response properties, and closed loop control performance in the time and frequency domains. The intent of this work is to serve as a benchmark and reference for other researchers seeking to utilize these exciting and emerging motor geometries.

[1]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Design Principles for a Family of Direct-Drive Legged Robots , 2016, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[2]  Moosa Ayati,et al.  Dynamic modeling and nonlinear tracking control of a novel modified quadrotor , 2018 .

[3]  Elliott J. Rouse,et al.  Design and Validation of a Torque-Controllable Knee Exoskeleton for Sit-to-Stand Assistance , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[4]  R. H. Park,et al.  Two-reaction theory of synchronous machines generalized method of analysis-part I , 1929, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[5]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  FlexSEA: Flexible, Scalable Electronics Architecture for wearable robotic applications , 2016, 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[6]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Clutchable series-elastic actuator: Implications for prosthetic knee design , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  Jonathan E. Clark,et al.  Leg design for running and jumping dynamics , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[8]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  Design and Characterization of an Open-Source Robotic Leg Prosthesis , 2018, 2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob).

[9]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  Exterior vs. interior rotors in robotic brushless motors , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.

[11]  Jeffrey H. Lang,et al.  Design Principles for Energy-Efficient Legged Locomotion and Implementation on the MIT Cheetah Robot , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[12]  Biao Huang,et al.  System Identification , 2000, Control Theory for Physicists.

[13]  Simon Kalouche GOAT: A legged robot with 3D agility and virtual compliance , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[14]  Yen-Chen Liu,et al.  Design, Modeling and Control of a Solar-Powered Quadcopter , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[15]  Tom Fleischer,et al.  Principles Of Electronic Materials And Devices , 2016 .