ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING Indicators for Transboundary River Management

The aim of this paper is to analyze the potential of indicators for integrated river basin management and to develop a set of indicators for the management of trans- boundary river basins. An indicator, comprising a variable or some aggregation of variables, describes a system or process such that it has significance beyond the face value of its com- ponents. Integrated river basin management takes into ac- count policies and measures for the multifunctional use of riv- ers on a catchment scale and associated institutional changes. Indicators are useful instruments for this process for two reasons. Firstly, they meet the information need of policy- and decision-makers. Secondly, indicators can be used to structure the definition and description of information needs and collection of information between the different interna- tional, institutional, and sectoral management levels. The de- velopment of indicators involves a number of steps: definition of aim, construction of conceptual model, selection of vari- ables, comparison with selection criteria, database assess- ment, and indicator selection. In this paper these steps are discussed and specified for integrated river basin manage- ment. This results in a set of indicators describing the pres- sure to the river, the state of the river ecosystem, the impact to goods and services provided by the river, and the societal response. The proposed set of indicators measured at a river basin scale provides integrated information on the use and supply of goods and services, underlying cause- effect rela- tionships and possible trade-offs and their spatial distribution (e.g., upstream versus downstream). Furthermore, we pro- pose a division of tasks and responsibilities for river basin management with regard to the development of indicators, data collection, and their application in decision-making.

[1]  Greef J de,et al.  Global Change and Sustainable Development. A modelling perspective for the next decade , 1994 .

[2]  H. Hosper Clearing lakes : an ecosystem approach to the restoration and management of shallow lakes in the Netherlands , 1997 .

[3]  G. Velde,et al.  Amphipod invasion on the Rhine , 1991, Nature.

[4]  Jan Eberg,et al.  Waste policy and learning: Policy dynamics of waste management and waste incineration in the Netherlands and Bavaria , 1997 .

[5]  P. Calow,et al.  Essential elements in the case for river conservation , 1992 .

[6]  P. Zaag,et al.  The management of shared river basins: experiences from SADC and EU , 1998 .

[7]  J. Rotmans Indicators for sustainable development , 1997 .

[8]  Eco,et al.  Monitoring Water Quality in the Future, Volume 3: Biomonitoring , 1995 .

[9]  Nenad Karajić,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Albert Adriaanse) , 1995 .

[10]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[11]  J. Lekakis,et al.  Policy analysis for an amicable, efficient and sustainable inter-country fresh water resource allocation , 1997 .

[12]  Mark E. Hanson,et al.  Global sustainability: Toward measurement , 1988 .

[13]  John Holmberg,et al.  Socio-ecological Indicators for Sustainability. , 1996 .

[14]  J. Lekakis,et al.  Fresh surface water resource allocation between Bulgaria and Greece , 1996 .

[15]  C. Lorenz,et al.  Indicators for sustainable river management , 1999 .

[16]  G. McBride,et al.  The “data-rich but information-poor” syndrome in water quality monitoring , 1986 .

[17]  Y. Ahmad,et al.  Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development , 1989 .

[18]  R. Swart,et al.  Scanning the global environment : a framework and methodology for integrated environmental reporting and assessment , 1995 .

[19]  Onno Kuik,et al.  In search of indicators of sustainable development , 1991 .

[20]  D. Bryant,et al.  Environmental indicators : a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development , 1995 .

[21]  N. V. van Straalen,et al.  Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria. , 1989, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[22]  Carel Dieperink Between salt and salmon , 1995 .

[23]  W. Wolff The Degradation of Ecosystems in the Rhine , 1978 .

[24]  Peter W. Downs,et al.  How integrated is river basin management? , 1991 .

[25]  Alison J. Gilbert,et al.  A sustainability indicator for the Dutch environmental policy theme 'Diffusion': cadmium accumulation in soil , 1994 .

[26]  Connor Sj The use of environmental informations systems (EIS) for malaria control planning in Africa. , 2002 .

[27]  Effecten van eutrofiering en hydrologische omstandigheden op fytoplankton in de Maas ; consequenties voor de drinkwaterbereiding , 1996 .

[28]  Ben ten Brink,et al.  The AMOEBA approach as a useful tool for establishing sustainable development , 1991 .

[29]  F. Colijn,et al.  A quantitative method for description & assessment of ecosystems: The AMOEBA-approach , 1991 .

[30]  W. P. Cofino,et al.  Concepts in river ecology: implications for indicator development , 1997 .

[31]  T. Tittizer,et al.  Ökosystemforschung: der Rhein und seine Auen : eine Bilanz , 1996 .

[32]  J. Lekakis,et al.  Bilateral Monopoly: A Market for Intercountry River Water Allocation , 1998, Environmental management.

[33]  Chris Hope,et al.  An overview of environmental indicators ; state of the art and perspectives , 1994 .

[34]  I. Bateman,et al.  Managing nutrient fluxes and pollution in the Baltic: An interdisciplinary simulation study , 1999 .

[35]  Luna Bergere Leopold,et al.  The concept of entropy in landscape evolution , 1962 .