A Guide for Developers and Users of Observation Systems and Manuals

To guide users and developers of observation systems and manuals, a set of criteria was developed. The criteria were collected and revised during the construction of a system, the System for Analysing Lessons 2, and revised during its use in the field. Thirty-three criteria which observation systems should meet were identified and sorted into three main types: identifying, validity, and practicality criteria. Identifying criteria enable users to select the correct instrument for their purposes. Validity criteria, which include criteria pertaining to the degree of inference, context, reliability and validity, relate to the accuracy with which the instrument represents the observed events. Practicality criteria provide information about the ease of administration and dissemination of results. Examples are provided.

[1]  Robert S. Soar.  Follow Through Classroom Process Measurement. , 1971 .

[2]  Ned A. Flanders,et al.  Analyzing Teaching Behavior , 1970 .

[3]  John Herbert,et al.  Direct Observation as a Research Technique. , 1970 .

[4]  Donald M. Medley,et al.  Experiences with the OScAR Technique , 1963 .

[5]  J. Reid.  Reliability Assessment of Observation Data: A Possible Methodological Problem. , 1970 .

[6]  Harold E. Mitzel,et al.  SOME BEHAVIORAL CORRELATES OF TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS , 1959 .

[7]  John L. Yeager,et al.  An Investigation of the Efficiency of Various Observational Procedures. , 1971 .

[8]  Theodore Abramson.  Development of Improved Techniques for Establishing the Reliability of Observation Ratings. Final Report. , 1970 .

[9]  Allan C. Ornstein.  Systematizing Teacher Behavior Research. , 1971 .

[10]  R. Barker,et al.  OBSERVATION OF BEHAVIOR: ECOLOGICAL APPROACHES. , 1964, Journal of the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York.

[11]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[12]  Barker Rg.  OBSERVATION OF BEHAVIOR: ECOLOGICAL APPROACHES. , 1964 .

[13]  Thomas Samph,et al.  Observer Effects on Teacher Behavior. , 1968 .

[14]  D. Bealing.  Issues in Classroom Observational Research , 1973 .

[15]  Barak Rosenshine,et al.  5: Evaluation of Classroom Instruction , 1970 .

[16]  James L. Wardrop,et al.  Classroom Observation Schemes: Where are the Errors? , 1972 .

[17]  Gerald M. Gillmore,et al.  A NOTE ON “ACCURACY” AND “PRECISION” , 1971 .

[18]  S. D. Saleh,et al.  Anxiety as a function of intrinsic-extrinsic job orientation. The presence or absence of observers, and task difficulty. , 1971, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Kaoru Yamamoto,et al.  A Note on the Processing of Classroom Observation Records , 1972 .

[20]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[21]  Robert D. Boyd,et al.  The Observation and Recording of Behavior , 1966 .

[22]  Robert H. Ennis.  Operational Definitions* , 1964 .

[23]  J. Herbert,et al.  A system for analyzing lessons , 1967 .

[24]  Gail R. Karafin.  Discussion of Considerations for Selecting or Developing an Observational System. , 1973 .

[25]  Richard F. Hurwitz.  The Reliability and Validity of Descriptive-Analytic Systems for Studying Classroom Behaviors. , 1973 .

[26]  William Mendenhall,et al.  THE RELIABILITY OF OBSERVATIONS OF TEACHERS' CLASSROOM BEHAVIOR. , 1968 .

[27]  E. Amidon,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Theory, Research and Application , 1967 .

[28]  M. Deutsch,et al.  Research Methods in Social Relations , 1952 .

[29]  Anita Simon,et al.  Mirrors for Behavior, An Anthology of Classroom Observation Instruments, 1970 Supplement, Vols. A and B. , 1969 .