Transportation Recommendation with Fairness Consideration

Recent years have witnessed the widespread use of online map services to recommend transportation routes involving multiple transport modes, such as bus, subway, and taxi. However, existing transportation recommendation services mainly focus on improving the overall user click-through rate that is dominated by mainstream user groups, and thus may result in unsatisfactory recommendations for users with diversified travel needs. In other words, different users may receive unequal services. To this end, in this paper, we first identify two types of unfairness in transportation recommendation, (i) the under-estimate unfairness which reflects lower recommendation accuracy (i.e., the quality), and (ii) the under-recommend unfairness which indicates lower recommendation volume (i.e., the quantity) for users who travel in certain regions and during certain time periods. Then, we propose the Fairness-Aware Spatiotemporal Transportation Recommendation (FASTR) framework to mitigate the transportation recommendation bias. In particular, based on a multi-task wide and deep learning model, we propose the dual-focal mechanism for under-estimate mitigation and tailor-designed spatiotemporal fairness metrics and regularizers for under-recommend mitigation. Finally, extensive experiments on two real-world datasets verify the effectiveness of our approach to handle these two types of unfairness.

[1]  Heng-Tze Cheng,et al.  Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systems , 2016, DLRS@RecSys.

[2]  Enhong Chen,et al.  Adam revisited: a weighted past gradients perspective , 2020, Frontiers of Computer Science.

[3]  Hao Liu,et al.  Incorporating Multi-Source Urban Data for Personalized and Context-Aware Multi-Modal Transportation Recommendation , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[4]  Yu Zheng,et al.  Trajectory Data Mining , 2015, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[5]  Antitza Dantcheva,et al.  Mitigating Bias in Gender, Age and Ethnicity Classification: A Multi-task Convolution Neural Network Approach , 2018, ECCV Workshops.

[6]  Barbara E. Engelhardt,et al.  How algorithmic confounding in recommendation systems increases homogeneity and decreases utility , 2017, RecSys.

[7]  Tomas E. Ward,et al.  Generative Adversarial Networks in Computer Vision , 2019, ACM Comput. Surv..

[8]  Nathan Srebro,et al.  Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning , 2016, NIPS.

[9]  T. Therneau,et al.  Assessing calibration of prognostic risk scores , 2016, Statistical methods in medical research.

[10]  Laurence R. Rilett,et al.  Heuristic shortest path algorithms for transportation applications: State of the art , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Fairness of Exposure in Rankings , 2018, KDD.

[12]  Sebastian Ruder,et al.  An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[13]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Beyond Globally Optimal: Focused Learning for Improved Recommendations , 2017, WWW.

[14]  Hui Xiong,et al.  Multi-Modal Transportation Recommendation with Unified Route Representation Learning , 2020, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[15]  Hui Xiong,et al.  Hydra: A Personalized and Context-Aware Multi-Modal Transportation Recommendation System , 2019, KDD.

[16]  Toon Calders,et al.  Three naive Bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification , 2010, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[17]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisons , 2019, KDD.

[18]  Hui Xiong,et al.  Exploring the Social Learning of Taxi Drivers in Latent Vehicle-to-Vehicle Networks , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[19]  Yunming Ye,et al.  DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Prediction , 2017, IJCAI.

[20]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankings , 2018, SIGIR.