Initial implementation of a depression care manager model: an observational study of outpatient utilization in primary care clinics.

Many primary care physicians understand the challenges of taking care of patients with depression. Care management models for depression have been described as more effective than usual practice. The implementation of such a model requires a clinic manager to be able to predict how this new process might impact staffing and clinical demand. This study was designed to evaluate the initial impact of the implementation of a depression care manager (CM) model on the utilization of outpatient visits. The hypothesis is that the introduction of a CM model for depression in a primary care practice would be associated with an increased utilization of health care resources when compared to usual care (UC). There were 38 patients enrolled during the initial 2 months of implementation of the CM model. Using a retrospective medical record review, the CM population was compared to a similar group receiving UC (N = 49), and a significant increase in the percentage of patients who were seen for any reason in the CM population was found (65.8% vs. 36.7%, P = 0.01). The average CM patient had 1.24 outpatient visits for any reason vs. 0.69 for the UC group (P = 0.01). When specifically focusing on outpatient visits for depression, the CM group averaged 0.95 visits per patient as compared to the UC patients having 0.55 visits per patient (P = 0.04). This study suggests that the initial implementation of a CM model for treatment of depression will increase outpatient utilization. .

[1]  Ming-Yu Fan,et al.  Long-term cost effects of collaborative care for late-life depression. , 2008, The American journal of managed care.

[2]  Alex J Sutton,et al.  Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  M. Fava,et al.  Substance use disorder comorbidity in major depressive disorder: a confirmatory analysis of the STAR*D cohort. , 2006, The American journal on addictions.

[4]  Jürgen Unützer,et al.  Cost-effectiveness and net benefit of enhanced treatment of depression for older adults with diabetes and depression. , 2006, Diabetes care.

[5]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of improving primary care treatment of late-life depression. , 2005, Archives of general psychiatry.

[6]  W. Katon,et al.  Improving adherence to antidepressants: a systematic review of interventions. , 2003, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

[7]  Mark T Hegel,et al.  Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[8]  W. Katon,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of a collaborative care program for primary care patients with persistent depression. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[9]  H. Wittchen,et al.  Met and unmet needs in the management of depressive disorder in the community and primary care: the size and breadth of the problem. , 2001, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[10]  P. M. Sørensen,et al.  General Practice , 1999 .

[11]  G. Simon,et al.  Recognition, management, and outcomes of depression in primary care. , 1995, Archives of family medicine.