Performance evaluation and improvement directions for an Indian electric utility

This study evaluates the performance of 29 Electricity Distribution Divisions (EDDs) of an Indian state – Uttarakhand – deploying Input oriented Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The results indicate that the performance of several EDDs is sub-optimal, suggesting the potential for cost reductions and possible reduction in employees number. In the DEA method more than one unit are identified as efficient. Therefore, this study suggests a method for ranking the efficient units by their importance as benchmarks for the inefficient units through benchmark share measure. The bigger the benchmark share, the more important an efficient division is in benchmarking for inefficient ones. Result reveals that plain area divisions are relatively efficient and have higher potential to influence the performance of inefficient EDDs. This study is envisaged to be instrumental to policy makers and managers to increase the operational efficiency of inefficient EDDs and thereby increase the competitiveness in the face of restructuring and liberalization of Indian electricity sector.

[1]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows: Advanced Techniques for Beginners , 2000 .

[2]  M. Pollitt,et al.  Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience , 2000 .

[3]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[4]  Shubha Pandit,et al.  Power sector reform in Maharashtra, India , 2010 .

[5]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[6]  K. Salvanes,et al.  Productivity differences in multiple output industries: An empirical application to electricity distribution , 1994 .

[7]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Between the state and market: Electricity sector reform in developing countries , 2006 .

[8]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Efficiency evaluation of the state owned electric utilities in India , 2006 .

[10]  S. Tankha,et al.  Getting reforms done in inhospitable institutional environments: untying a Gordian Knot in India’s power distribution sector , 2010 .

[11]  Subhodip Ghosh Status of thermal power generation in India—Perspectives on capacity, generation and carbon dioxide emissions , 2010 .

[12]  T. Stewart A CRITICAL SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1992 .

[13]  Wen-Min Lu,et al.  Assessing the performance and finding the benchmarks of the electricity distribution districts of Taiwan power company , 2006 .

[14]  D. Lubkeman,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Electric Distribution Utilities Based on Data Envelopment Analysis , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[15]  P. Miliotis,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Applied to Electricity Distribution Districts , 1992 .

[16]  F. Førsund,et al.  Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units , 1996 .

[17]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[19]  Peter C Smith,et al.  Measuring efficiency in the public sector , 1987 .

[20]  R. Balasubramanian,et al.  Performance of Indian power sector during a decade under restructuring: a critique , 2005 .

[21]  Narayana Prasad Padhy,et al.  A micro level study of an Indian electric utility for efficiency enhancement , 2010 .

[22]  R. Ramanathan An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool for Performance Measurement , 2003 .

[23]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  On Returns to Scale under Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2001 .

[24]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[25]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[26]  Anoop Singh,et al.  Power Sector Reform in India: Current Issues and Prospects , 2006 .

[27]  Gary R. Reeves,et al.  A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA: Some Recent Developments , 2001 .

[29]  Anoop Singh,et al.  Towards a Competitive Market for Electricity and Consumer Choice in the Indian Power Sector , 2010 .