Energy Efficiency of Low Swing Signaling for Emerging Interposer Technologies

Interconnects often constitute the major bottleneck in the design process of low power integrated circuits (IC). Although 2.5-D integration technologies support physical proximity, the dissipated power in the communication links remains high. In this work, the additional power savings for interposer-based interconnects enabled by low swing signaling is investigated. The energy consumed by a low swing scheme is, therefore, compared with a full swing solution and the critical length of the interconnect, above which the low swing solution starts to pay off, is determined for diverse interposer technologies. The energy consumption is compared for three different substrate materials, silicon, glass, and organic. Results indicate that the higher the load capacitance of the communication medium is, the greater the energy savings of the low swing circuit are. Specifically, in cases that electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection is required, the low swing circuit is always superior in terms of energy consumption due to the high capacitive load of the ESD circuit, regardless the substrate material and the link length. Without ESD protection, the highest critical length is about 380 μm for glass and organic interposers. To further explore the limits of power reduction from low swing signaling for 2.5-D ICs, the effect of typical interconnect parameters such as width and space on the energy efficiency of low swing communication is evaluated.

[1]  Joungho Kim,et al.  Noise coupling of through-via in silicon and glass interposer , 2013, 2013 IEEE 63rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference.

[2]  George Varghese,et al.  Low-swing on-chip signaling techniques: effectiveness and robustness , 2000, IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst..

[3]  Rao Tummala,et al.  Signal and power integrity analysis in 2.5D integrated circuits (ICs) with glass, silicon and organic interposer , 2015, 2015 IEEE 65th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC).

[4]  Saeid Nooshabadi,et al.  CMOS Driver-Receiver Pair for Low-Swing Signaling for Low Energy On-Chip Interconnects , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems.

[5]  Vasilis F. Pavlidis,et al.  Interconnect design tradeoffs for silicon and glass interposers , 2014, 2014 IEEE 12th International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS).

[6]  Shekhar Borkar,et al.  Role of Interconnects in the Future of Computing , 2013, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[7]  Dake Liu,et al.  Power consumption estimation in CMOS VLSI chips , 1994, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits.

[8]  Kunle Olukotun,et al.  The Future of Microprocessors , 2005, ACM Queue.

[9]  K. Oi,et al.  Development of new 2.5D package with novel integrated organic interposer substrate with ultra-fine wiring and high density bumps , 2014, 2014 IEEE 64th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC).

[10]  SylvesterDennis,et al.  High performance level conversion for dual VDD design , 2004 .

[11]  M. Sunohara,et al.  Studies on electrical performance and thermal stress of a silicon interposer with TSVs , 2010, 2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC).

[12]  Rao Tummala,et al.  Design and Demonstration of a 2.5-D Glass Interposer BGA Package for High Bandwidth and Low Cost , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology.

[13]  Shyh-Chyi Wong,et al.  Modeling of interconnect capacitance, delay, and crosstalk in VLSI , 2000 .

[14]  Puneet Gupta,et al.  Latency, Bandwidth and Power Benefits of the SuperCHIPS Integration Scheme , 2017, 2017 IEEE 67th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC).

[15]  Przemyslaw Mroszczyk,et al.  Ultra-low swing CMOS transceiver for 2.5-D integrated systems , 2018, 2018 19th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED).

[16]  Saeid Nooshabadi,et al.  Adaptive Low/High Voltage Swing CMOS Driver for On-Chip Interconnects , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[17]  V. Sundaram,et al.  Modeling, design and fabrication of ultra-thin and low CTE organic interposers at 40µm I/O pitch , 2015, 2015 IEEE 65th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC).

[18]  Dennis Sylvester,et al.  High performance level conversion for dual V/sub DD/ design , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems.

[19]  P.A. Beerel,et al.  Low swing signaling using a dynamic diode-connected driver , 2001, Proceedings of the 27th European Solid-State Circuits Conference.

[20]  Paul D. Franzon,et al.  Power comparison of 2D, 3D and 2.5D interconnect solutions and power optimization of interposer interconnects , 2013, 2013 IEEE 63rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference.

[21]  Eby G. Friedman,et al.  Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuit Design, 2nd Edition , 2017 .