Development of a mapping framework for ecosystem services: The case of sediment control supply at a watershed scale in Newfoundland, Canada

Abstract Mapping the supply of ecosystem services (ESs) is essential for communicating the importance of ESs to policy makers and to demonstrate that sustainable development is being applied with due diligence by forest managers. ES mapping facilitates the integration of ES assessments into the decision-making process. To that end, the main objective of this study was to provide a mapping framework for a specific water-related regulating ES – the sediment control service (SCS) – developed for a forest-dominated watershed in western Newfoundland, Canada (640 km2). The mapping framework proposes the development of composite indicators (referred to as an index), based on a proxy variables causal relationship approach, which is less complex to implement than physical models and less subjective than expert opinions. Two composite indicators used to rank sub-watersheds on a relative scale were developed: one using equal weights among proxies and a second using expert opinion to assign weights to proxies. The use of an index for mapping addresses the multidimensional and complex nature of ESs. The proxy variables represent ecosystem function indicators (FI) that are necessary to describe the causal relationship between ecological functions and SCS. The validation of ESs map results is often lacking in the literature. Therefore, we propose comparing the SCS relative scales with a sediment-yield classification that is simulated using the hydrological model SWAT (Soil Water Assessment Tool). To that end, the semi-distributed hydrological SWAT model has been developed. The overall agreement of the classification ranged from 35 to 81% depending upon the timeframe and weighting schemes that were applied, with better results being obtained for periods with more forest management operations and the expert-based weighting scheme. Results of the framework implementation show the potential supply of SCS at a sub-watershed scale and highlight those sub-watersheds most likely to be affected by forest management operations.

[1]  Kari L Vigerstol,et al.  A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  A. Barbati,et al.  Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems , 2010 .

[3]  Ana Cristina Cardoso,et al.  Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management , 2016 .

[4]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments: a review , 2015 .

[5]  C. R. Jackson,et al.  Linkages between forest soils and water quality and quantity , 2009 .

[6]  Mikko T. Niemi,et al.  Airborne LiDAR-derived elevation data in terrain trafficability mapping , 2017 .

[7]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services , 2012 .

[8]  Sunita Khanal,et al.  Evaluating the Impacts of Forest Clear Cutting on Water and Sediment Yields Using SWAT in Mississippi , 2013 .

[9]  Thomas Meixner,et al.  A global and efficient multi-objective auto-calibration and uncertainty estimation method for water quality catchment models , 2007 .

[10]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  An evaluation framework based on sustainability-related indicators for the comparison of conceptual approaches for ecological networks , 2015 .

[11]  D. Sheil,et al.  What scope for certifying forest ecosystem services , 2014 .

[12]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Uncertainties in Ecosystem Service Maps: A Comparison on the European Scale , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  J. Burke,et al.  Modelling the effects of boreal forest landscape management upon streamflow and water quality: Basic concepts and considerations , 2003 .

[14]  M. Choto,et al.  Impacts of land use/land cover change on stream flow and sediment yield of Gojeb watershed, Omo-Gibe basin, Ethiopia , 2019, Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment.

[15]  T. McPhearson,et al.  Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units , 2015 .

[16]  R. Sturrock,et al.  Anticipating the consequences of climate change for Canada’s boreal forest ecosystems1 , 2013 .

[17]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[18]  Rebecca Logsdon Muenich,et al.  Comparing two tools for ecosystem service assessments regarding water resources decisions. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  H. Spiecker,et al.  How Forest Management affects Ecosystem Services, including Timber Production and Economic Return: Synergies and Trade-Offs , 2012 .

[20]  E. Rametsteiner,et al.  Forest certification--an instrument to promote sustainable forest management? , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[22]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning , 2012 .

[23]  Benjamin Burkhard,et al.  Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—A theoretical matrix exercise , 2013 .

[24]  R. Fournier,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services provided by wetlands at multiple spatiotemporal scales: A case study in Quebec, Canada. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  C. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .

[26]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[27]  Ignacio C. Fernández,et al.  When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators , 2017 .

[28]  John Wainwright,et al.  Sediment connectivity: a framework for understanding sediment transfer at multiple scales , 2015 .

[29]  A. Reynaud,et al.  Mapping water provisioning services to support the ecosystem-water-food-energy nexus in the Danube river basin , 2016 .

[30]  Patricia Balvanera,et al.  Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review , 2012 .

[31]  D. Richardson,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management , 2008 .

[32]  R. Kozak,et al.  Forest Stewardship Council certification for forest ecosystem services: An analysis of stakeholder adaptability , 2016 .

[33]  M. Guariguata,et al.  Challenges for developing Forest Stewardship Council certification for ecosystem services: How to enhance local adoption? , 2017 .

[34]  Sergi Herrando,et al.  The spatial level of analysis affects the patterns of forest ecosystem services supply and their relationships. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[35]  B. Grizzetti,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union , 2012 .

[36]  Carmelo Maria Torre,et al.  Non-compensatory composite indicators for the evaluation of urban planning policy: The Land-Use Policy Efficiency Index (LUPEI) , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services , 2006 .

[38]  H. Wittmer,et al.  “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making , 2013 .

[39]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Management of ecosystem services in mountain forests: Review of indicators and value functions for model based multi-criteria decision analysis , 2017 .

[40]  Berta Martín-López,et al.  Mapping forest ecosystem services: from providing units to beneficiaries. , 2013 .

[41]  G. Ziv,et al.  Empirical validation of the InVEST water yield ecosystem service model at a national scale. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[42]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Composite Indicators between Analysis and Advocacy , 2007 .

[43]  Jason Smith,et al.  Developing a systematic simulation-based approach for selecting indicators in strategic cumulative effects assessments with multiple environmental valued components , 2016 .

[44]  A. Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services into spatial planning - a spatial decision support tool. , 2017 .

[45]  F. Müller,et al.  Water-related ecosystem services in Western Siberian lowland basins—Analysing and mapping spatial and seasonal effects on regulating services based on ecohydrological modelling results , 2016 .

[46]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[47]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation , 2012 .

[48]  N. Coops,et al.  Integrating airborne lidar and satellite imagery to model habitat connectivity dynamics for spatial conservation prioritization , 2018, Landscape Ecology.

[49]  Xiaohuan Xi,et al.  Estimation of wetland vegetation height and leaf area index using airborne laser scanning data , 2015 .

[50]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[51]  Amila Jayasinghe,et al.  Ecosystem services-based composite indicator for assessing community resilience to floods , 2018, Environmental Development.

[52]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[53]  I. Creed,et al.  Managing Forests for Water in the Anthropocene—The Best Kept Secret Services of Forest Ecosystems , 2016 .

[54]  G. Daily,et al.  The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services , 2007 .

[55]  B. Thorsen,et al.  A framework for modeling adaptive forest management and decision making under climate change , 2017 .

[56]  F. Müller,et al.  The indicator side of ecosystem services , 2012 .

[57]  A. Meiner,et al.  An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 , 2016 .

[58]  Bernhard Lehner,et al.  Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world's large river systems , 2013 .

[59]  S. Greco,et al.  On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness , 2019 .

[60]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? , 2017 .

[61]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe , 2012 .

[62]  R. Congalton,et al.  Accuracy assessment: a user's perspective , 1986 .

[63]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .

[64]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The impact of proxy‐based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services , 2010 .

[65]  C. Messier,et al.  A framework towards a composite indicator for urban ecosystem services , 2016 .

[66]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Monitoring Canada’s forests. Part 1: Completion of the EOSD land cover project , 2008 .

[67]  Elizabeth Brabec,et al.  Impervious Surfaces and Water Quality: A Review of Current Literature and Its Implications for Watershed Planning , 2002 .

[68]  Christopher Andrews,et al.  Practical application of spatial ecosystem service models to aid decision support , 2017, Ecosystem services.

[69]  Stefan Lang,et al.  A composite indicator for assessing habitat quality of riparian forests derived from Earth observation data , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[70]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[71]  Benjamin P. Bryant,et al.  Uncertainty assessment in ecosystem services analyses: Seven challenges and practical responses , 2017 .

[72]  R. Bergmann,et al.  Different Outcomes of the Wilcoxon—Mann—Whitney Test from Different Statistics Packages , 2000 .

[73]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model ecosystem services: A systematic review , 2016 .

[74]  I. Chaubey,et al.  A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services , 2013 .