Risk assessment and land-use planning regulations in France following the AZF disaster

Abstract After the disaster of AZF plant in Toulouse on 21 September 2001 (31 people killed, 3000 injured and 3 billion dollars of damage), France adopted a new law relative to safety reports and land-use planning on 30 July 2003. This law asks for the investigation of all representative scenarios and the assessment of their probabilities to demonstrate the acceptable level of safety of an industrial facility. Therefore significant changes were introduced in the way of doing risk analysis in France and some difficulties were found for the implementation of a probabilistic approach. This paper presents the new approach of risk analysis established by the French Ministry of the Environment, and particularly focuses on: • the benefits and limits of the semi-quantitative probabilistic assessment method; • the benefits and difficulties to use a quantitative probabilistic assessment method; • some learning from the risk analysis approaches carried out in the nuclear industry; • some discussion about the national matrix to appreciate the gravity of human consequences from an accident outside facilities.

[1]  Ralph R. Fullwood Probabilistic safety assessment in the chemical and nuclear industries , 1999 .

[2]  John Spouge New generic leak frequencies for process equipment , 2005 .

[3]  C. Nussey Risk analysis of six potentially hazardous industrial objects in the Rijnmond area, a pilot study: A report to the Rijnmond public authority , 1983 .

[4]  Victor F. Weisskopf,et al.  Reactor safety study , 1976 .

[5]  Nijs Jan Duijm,et al.  Safety-barrier diagrams as a safety management tool , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  A. J. Spurgin,et al.  Systematic Human Action Reliability Procedure (SHARP) , 1984 .

[7]  Christian Delvosalle,et al.  Influence of new generic frequencies on the QRA calculations for land use planning purposes in Walloon region (Belgium) , 2011 .

[8]  Frank P. Lees,et al.  Loss Prevention In The Process Industries , 1980 .

[9]  J. G. Post,et al.  The ‘Purple Book’: Guideline for Quantitative Risk Assessment in the Netherlands , 2001 .

[10]  R. G. Warwick,et al.  A survey of defects in pressure vessels in the UK for the period 1962–1978 and its relevance to nuclear primary circuits , 1983 .

[11]  John C. Wincek,et al.  Realistic human error rates for process hazard analyses , 2007 .

[12]  A. D. Swain,et al.  Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report , 1983 .

[13]  LeslieE. Lahti,et al.  Guidelines for process equipment reliability data , 1991 .

[14]  J G Post,et al.  The use of generic failure frequencies in QRA: the quality and use of failure frequencies and how to bring them up-to-date. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.