Dealing with indetermination in biochemical networks

A main aspect in computational modelling of biological systems is the determination of model structure and model parameters. Due to economical and technical reasons, only part of these details are well characterized, while the rest are unknown. To deal with this difficulty, many reverse engineering and parameter estimation methods have been proposed in the literature, however these methods often need an amount of experimental data not always available. In this paper we propose an alternative approach, which overcomes model indetermination solving an Optimization Problem (OP) with an objective function that, similarly to Flux Balance Analysis, is derived from an empirical biological knowledge and does not require large amounts of data. The system behaviour is described by a set of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE). Model indetermination is resolved selecting time-varying coefficients that maximize/minimize the objective function at each ODE integration step. Moreover, to facilitate the modelling phase we provide a graphical formalism, based on Petri Nets, which can be used to derive the corresponding ODEs and OP. Finally, the approach is illustrated on a case study focused on cancer metabolism.

[1]  C. Geiss,et al.  An introduction to probability theory , 2008 .

[2]  Neema Jamshidi,et al.  Mass action stoichiometric simulation models: incorporating kinetics and regulation into stoichiometric models. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Michael P. Lisanti,et al.  Cancer metabolism: a therapeutic perspective , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[4]  F. Doyle,et al.  Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Age K Smilde,et al.  Reverse engineering of metabolic networks, a critical assessment. , 2011, Molecular bioSystems.

[6]  D. Gillespie A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation , 1992 .

[7]  Prodromos Daoutidis,et al.  Bistability in Glycolysis Pathway as a Physiological Switch in Energy Metabolism , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  Carmen G. Moles,et al.  Parameter estimation in biochemical pathways: a comparison of global optimization methods. , 2003, Genome research.

[9]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems: A Practical Guide for Biochemists and Molecular Biologists , 2000 .

[10]  Xin Liu,et al.  State and parameter estimation of the heat shock response system using Kalman and particle filters , 2012, Bioinform..

[11]  Luonan Chen,et al.  Biomolecular Networks: Methods and Applications in Systems Biology , 2009 .

[12]  Marco S. Nobile,et al.  Computational Strategies for a System-Level Understanding of Metabolism , 2014, Metabolites.

[13]  J. Selbig,et al.  Kinetic hybrid models composed of mechanistic and simplified enzymatic rate laws – a promising method for speeding up the kinetic modelling of complex metabolic networks , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[14]  Michael K. Molloy Performance Analysis Using Stochastic Petri Nets , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[15]  Jamey D. Young Learning from the Steersman: A Natural History of Cybernetic Models , 2015 .

[16]  R. Steele Optimization , 2005 .

[17]  J. Rabinowitz,et al.  Absolute Metabolite Concentrations and Implied Enzyme Active Site Occupancy in Escherichia coli , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[18]  M. V. Vander Heiden Targeting cancer metabolism: a therapeutic window opens. , 2011, Nature reviews. Drug discovery.

[19]  Jeffrey D Orth,et al.  What is flux balance analysis? , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Louchka Popova-Zeugmann,et al.  Time and Petri Nets , 2013, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[21]  Marco Beccuti,et al.  GreatSPN Enhanced with Decision Diagram Data Structures , 2010, Petri Nets.