Three different types of bibliometrics — literature bibliometrics, patent bibliometrics, and linkage bibliometric can all be used to address various government performance and results questions. Applications of these three bibliometric types will be described within the framework of Weinberg's internal and external criteria, whether the work being done is good science, efficiently and effectively done, and whether it is important science from a technological viewpoint. Within all bibliometrics the fundamental assumption is that the frequency with which a set of papers or patents is cited is a measure of the impact or influence of the set of papers. The literature bibliometric indicators are counts of publications and citations received in the scientific literature and various derived indicators including such phenomena as cross-sectoral citation, coauthorship and concentration within influential journals. One basic observation of literature bibliometrics, which carries over to patent bibliometrics, is that of highly skewed distributions — with a relatively small number of high-impact patents and papers, and large numbers of patents and papers of minimal impact. The key measure is whether an agency is producing or supporting highly cited papers and patents. The final set of data are in the area of linkage bibliometrics, looking at citations from patents to scientific papers. These are particularly relevant to the external criteria, in that it is quite obvious that institutions and supporting agencies whose papers are highly cited in patents are making measurable contributions to a nation's technological progress.
[1]
Francis Narin,et al.
Status report: Linkage between technology and science
,
1992
.
[2]
Francis Narin,et al.
Human genetic technology: exploring the links between science and innovation
,
1996
.
[3]
Gabriel Pinski,et al.
Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics
,
1976,
Inf. Process. Manag..
[4]
L B Ellwein,et al.
Linkage between research sponsorship and patented eye-care technology.
,
1996,
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[5]
Francis Narin,et al.
Is technology becoming science?
,
1985,
Scientometrics.
[6]
F. Narin,et al.
NIH funding and biomedical publication output.
,
1976,
Federation proceedings.
[7]
Francis Narin,et al.
An analysis of research publications supported by NIH 1973-76 and 1977-80 : National Institutes of Health and NIH Intramural Program
,
1986
.
[8]
Francis Narin,et al.
Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers
,
1991,
Scientometrics.
[9]
Per Ottar Seglen,et al.
The skewness of science
,
1992
.
[10]
Alfred J. Lotka,et al.
The frequency distribution of scientific productivity
,
1926
.
[11]
Alvin M. Weinberg,et al.
Criteria for scientific choice II: The two cultures
,
1964
.
[12]
A. Weinberg.
Criteria for scientific choice
,
1963,
Minerva.