Publication bias and merit in ecology
暂无分享,去创建一个
Amber E. Budden | Christopher J. Lortie | Julia Koricheva | Tom Tregenza | Roosa Leimu | Lonnie W. Aarssen | T. Tregenza | L. Aarssen | C. Lortie | A. Budden | J. Koricheva | R. Leimu | Roosa Leimu
[1] Leeat Yariv,et al. What's in a Surname? The Effects of Surname Initials on Academic Success , 2006 .
[2] Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al. Advanced bibliometric methods for the evaluation of universities , 1999, Scientometrics.
[3] David Grimm,et al. Suggesting or Excluding Reviewers Can Help Get Your Paper Published , 2005, Science.
[4] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions , 2005, Scientometrics.
[5] J. Koricheva,et al. Does Scientific Collaboration Increase the Impact of Ecological Articles? , 2005 .
[6] J. Koricheva,et al. What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[7] Julia Koricheva,et al. Cumulative meta–analysis: a new tool for detection of temporal trends and publication bias in ecology , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[8] PHILLIP CASSEY,et al. Publication and Rejection among Successful Ecologists , 2004 .
[9] G. Sinha,et al. News Feature: A lab of her own , 2004, Nature Medicine.
[10] J. L. Tomkins,et al. Publication bias in meta-analysis: seeing the wood for the trees , 2004 .
[11] G. Sinha,et al. A lab of her own. , 2004, Nature medicine.
[12] N. Stamp. Theory of plant defensive level: example of process and pitfalls in development of ecological theory , 2003 .
[13] Tim M. Blackburn,et al. Publication rejection among ecologists , 2003 .
[14] D. Colquhoun. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors , 2003, Nature.
[15] Julia Koricheva,et al. Non-significant results in ecology: a burden or a blessing in disguise? , 2003 .
[16] Ann Sears. Image Problems Deplete the Number of Women in Academic Applicant Pools , 2003 .
[17] Tom Tregenza,et al. Gender bias in the refereeing process , 2002 .
[18] A. MØller,et al. Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the ‘trim and fill’ method , 2002, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[19] David Adam,et al. Citation analysis: The counting house , 2002, Nature.
[20] A. Møller,et al. Testing and adjusting for publication bias , 2001 .
[21] Alex J. Sutton,et al. Publication and related biases: a review , 2000 .
[22] C. Lortie. Why reply (to Hjältén and Price) , 2000 .
[23] S Duval,et al. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.
[24] E. David Ford,et al. Scientific Method for Ecological Research , 2000 .
[25] Christopher J. Lortie,et al. Over-Interpretation: Avoiding the Stigma of Non-Significant Results , 1999 .
[26] H. Kokko,et al. What do impact factors tell us? , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[27] A. Palmer,et al. Detecting Publication Bias in Meta‐analyses: A Case Study of Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Selection , 1999, The American Naturalist.
[28] Janne S. Kotiaho,et al. Unfamiliar citations breed mistakes , 1999, Nature.
[29] M. Austin. A silent clash of paradigms : some inconsistencies in community ecology , 1999 .
[30] Jessica Gurevitch,et al. STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META‐ANALYSES , 1999 .
[31] L. Aarssen. Progress Drive from Progress Pride , 1999 .
[32] Janne S. Kotiaho,et al. Papers vanish in mis-citation black hole , 1999, Nature.
[33] D. Wilkinson. Fragments of an entangled bank : do ecologists study most of ecology? , 1998 .
[34] H. Abt. Why some papers have long citation lifetimes , 1998, Nature.
[35] L. Aarssen. On the progress of ecology , 1997 .
[36] T. Tregenza,et al. Natural selection bias? , 1997, Nature.
[37] Simon H. Friedman,et al. A novel paradigm , 1997, Nature.
[38] Tom Tregenza. Darwin a better name than Wallace? , 1997, Nature.
[39] M. Elgar,et al. Heritabilities and paradigm shifts , 1997, Nature.
[40] Jocelyn Steinke,et al. A Lab of Her Own? , 1996 .
[41] Ryan D. Csada,et al. The "File Drawer Problem" of Non-Significant Results: Does It Apply to Biological Research? , 1996 .
[42] Juan Miguel Campanario,et al. Have Referees Rejected Some of the Most-Cited Articles of All Times? , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[43] Juan Miguel Campanario,et al. Commentary: On Influential Books and Journal Articles Initially Rejected Because of Negative Referees' Evaluations , 1995 .
[44] M Nylenna,et al. Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language. , 1994, JAMA.
[45] Per Ottar Seglen,et al. Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact , 1994 .
[46] Miguel Campanario,et al. Consolation for the Scientist: Sometimes it is Hard to Publish Papers that are Later Highly-Cited , 1993 .
[47] C Loehle,et al. Hypothesis Testing in Ecology: Psychological Aspects and the Importance of Theory Maturation , 1987, The Quarterly Review of Biology.