5G Cellular and Fixed Satellite Service Spectrum Coexistence in C-Band

The C-Band (3.4 – 4.2 GHz) is a cornerstone for many satellite services including Fixed Satellite Service (FSS), in particular above 3.6 GHz. The large geographic coverage of C-band satellite beams represents a cost-effective communication solution, while its robustness to weather impairments makes C-band the most suitable band to guarantee high service availability. On the other hand, C-band has long been a top candidate for the deployment of 5G-cellular systems because it is a mid-band spectrum, blending the signal reach of lower bands with the capacity of higher bands. The potential assignment of C-band to the 5G cellular systems is seen as a threat by the satellite operators, who are concerned about the interference that the 5G-cellular system may cause to their services, potentially leading to service interruption and causing a serious economic impact. This paper presents the interference studies of 5G cellular systems operating in the below 6 GHz band in both the adjacent channel and co-channel scenarios. We present a detailed analysis for both 5G-celullar downlink and uplink, considering the impact of out-of-band emissions, potential Low-Noise Block (LNB) saturation at the FSS Earth station receiver and the consequences of the deployment of Active Antenna Systems (AAS) in the terrestrial Base Stations (BSs). The outcomes of this paper aim to shed some light to spectrum regulators and other related stakeholders regarding the impact of the future deployment of 5G-cellular systems in the FSS Earth station receivers operating in C-band. The paper also propose and evaluates potential techniques that can be applied to facilitate the coexistence of both systems, e.g. switching off critical emitters or backing-off their transmit power.

[1]  Symeon Chatzinotas,et al.  Dynamic Spectrum Sharing in 5G Wireless Networks With Full-Duplex Technology: Recent Advances and Research Challenges , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[2]  Symeon Chatzinotas,et al.  Cognitive approaches to enhance spectrum availability for satellite systems , 2017, Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw..

[3]  Alberth Tamo,et al.  Interference simulation between 5G and GSO–NGSO networks at 27-30 GHz range , 2019, 2019 IEEE-APS Topical Conference on Antennas and Propagation in Wireless Communications (APWC).

[4]  Claudia Carciofi,et al.  Co-channel and adjacent-channel coexistence between LTE-TDD and VSAT DVB-S in C-band: experimental campaign on consumer VSAT receivers , 2018, 2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[5]  Muhammad Suryanegara,et al.  Regulation Challenges of 5G Spectrum Deployment at 3.5 GHz: The Framework for Indonesia , 2018, 2018 Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS).

[6]  Symeon Chatzinotas,et al.  Resource Allocation for Cognitive Satellite Communications With Incumbent Terrestrial Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking.

[7]  Symeon Chatzinotas,et al.  Implementation Issues of Cognitive Radio techniques for Ka-band (17.7–19.7 GHz) SatComs , 2014, 2014 7th Advanced Satellite Multimedia Systems Conference and the 13th Signal Processing for Space Communications Workshop (ASMS/SPSC).

[8]  Han-Shin Jo,et al.  The Feasibility of Coexistence Between 5G and Existing Services in the IMT-2020 Candidate Bands in Malaysia , 2017, IEEE Access.

[9]  Ghaith Hattab,et al.  Multiband Spectrum Access: Great Promises for Future Cognitive Radio Networks , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Symeon Chatzinotas,et al.  Impact of Terrain Aware Interference Modeling on the Throughput of Cognitive Ka-Band Satellite Systems , 2015 .

[11]  Guillem Femenias,et al.  Joint frequency assignment and flow control for hybrid terrestrial-satellite backhauling networks , 2017, 2017 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS).

[12]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Licensed and Unlicensed Spectrum for Future 5G/B5G Wireless Networks , 2019, IEEE Netw..

[13]  Prediction procedure for the evaluation of interference between stations on the surface of the Earth at frequencies above about 0.1 GHz , 2009 .

[14]  Veikko Seppänen,et al.  Analysis of Spectrum Valuation Elements for Local 5G Networks: Case Study of 3.5-GHz Band , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking.

[15]  Xianfu Chen,et al.  Large-Scale Spatial Distribution Identification of Base Stations in Cellular Networks , 2014, IEEE Access.

[16]  A. H. van den Ende,et al.  Co-existence of 5G mobile networks with C-Band Satellite Interception in Burum , 2018 .

[17]  Mahesh K. Marina,et al.  Future wireless spectrum below 6 GHz: A UK perspective , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[18]  Taoka Hidekazu,et al.  Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: the vision of the METIS project , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.