Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory.

The role of feature correlations in semantic memory is a central issue in conceptual representation. In two versions of the feature verification task, participants were faster to verify that a feature (< is juicy >) is part of a concept (grapefruit) if it is strongly rather than weakly intercorrelated with the other features of that concept. Contrasting interactions between feature correlations and SOA were found when the concept versus the feature was presented first. An attractor network model of word meaning that naturally learns and uses feature correlations predicted those interactions. This research provides further evidence that semantic memory includes implicitly learned statistical knowledge of feature relationships, in contrast to theories such as spreading activation networks, in which feature correlations play no role.

[1]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  Learning and Applying Category Knowledge in Unsupervised Domains , 1991 .

[2]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Dorrit Billman,et al.  Observational Learning From Internal Feedback: A Simulation of an Adaptive Learning Method , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[5]  D L Medin,et al.  Concepts and conceptual structure. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[6]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. , 1993, Child development.

[7]  S. Lupker.  Semantic Priming without Association: A Second Look. , 1984 .

[8]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[9]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[10]  J. L. Myers.  Fundamentals of Experimental Design , 1972 .

[11]  K. McRae,et al.  Automatic semantic similarity priming. , 1998 .

[12]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[13]  B. Younger,et al.  Infants' detection of correlations among feature categories. , 1990, Child development.

[14]  Steven A. Sloman,et al.  Feature Centrality and Conceptual Coherence , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  R. Palmer,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[16]  L B Cohen,et al.  Developmental change in infants' perception of correlations among attributes. , 1986, Child development.

[17]  M. Ashcraft.  Property dominance and typicality effects in property statement verification , 1978 .

[18]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M K Kaiser,et al.  The development of sensitivity to causally relevant dynamic information. , 1984, Child development.

[20]  S. Sloman.  Feature-Based Induction , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[22]  John J. Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities , 1999 .

[23]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Feature correlations in conceptual representations , 1989 .

[24]  B. Gillam,et al.  Perception and Cognition at Century''s End , 1998 .

[25]  James F. Knutson,et al.  Unsupervised Concept Learning and Value Systematicity: A Complex Whole Aids Learning the Parts , 1996 .

[26]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[27]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  How semantic is automatic semantic priming , 1992 .

[28]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  W D Wattenmaker.  Incidental concept learning, feature frequency, and correlated properties. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[31]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[32]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  Advances in cognitive science: Vol. 2: Theory and applications : Guy Tiberghien (ed.), Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, 1989. 204 pp., £39.95 , 1990 .

[33]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[34]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[35]  T. Landauer,et al.  Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .

[36]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[37]  Chris McNorgan,et al.  An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: simulating semantic priming , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[38]  F. Keil.  Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[39]  L. Cohen,et al.  Infant perception of correlations among attributes. , 1983, Child development.

[40]  Dorrit Billman,et al.  Systems of correlations in rule and category learning: Use of structured input in learning syntactic categories , 1989 .

[41]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[42]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[43]  W. D. Wattenmaker,et al.  Learning modes, feature correlations, and memory-based categorization. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[45]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Accessing Different Types of Lexical Semantic Information: Evidence From Priming , 1995 .