Update on second trimester medical abortion

Purpose of review To review recent literature on second trimester abortion with medical methods. Recent findings Across studies published in the recent past, it is apparent that women prefer shorter procedures and procedure times. Several randomized controlled trials have confirmed adding mifepristone to the second trimester medication abortion regimen results in shorter abortion intervals from first misoprostol administration to complete fetal expulsion. A study of simultaneous administration of mifepristone and misoprostol yielded shorter mean ‘total’ abortion times, presenting several logistical advantages. Recent studies on the continuous dosing of misoprostol have produced critical evidence to support continued dosing until expulsion. These studies had a more practical design compared with previous protocols that capped the number of misoprostol doses. Summary Second trimester surgical abortion is well tolerated and increasingly expeditious. Further research is needed to refine second trimester medical abortion methods, specific to the mifepristone, misoprostol dosing interval. A 12-hour mifepristone to misoprostol interval may be the optimal interval balancing patient preferences and logistical considerations. Pragmatic dosing, including continuous dosing of misoprostol, could yield results that better inform clinical guidelines and reduce burden on patient, provider, and health facility.

[1]  B. Winikoff,et al.  Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone followed by unlimited dosing of buccal misoprostol in Armenia , 2017, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[2]  K. Shaw,et al.  Update on second-trimester surgical abortion , 2016, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[3]  N. Ngoc,et al.  Simultaneous Administration Compared With a 24-Hour Mifepristone–Misoprostol Interval in Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2016, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  L. Myer,et al.  Clinical Outcomes and Women’s Experiences before and after the Introduction of Mifepristone into Second-Trimester Medical Abortion Services in South Africa , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  M. Reeves,et al.  A randomized controlled trial evaluating same-day mifepristone and misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical preparation prior to second-trimester surgical abortion. , 2016, Contraception.

[6]  S. Little,et al.  Second trimester dilation and evacuation: a risk factor for preterm birth? , 2015, Journal of Perinatology.

[7]  R. A. Al,et al.  Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Buccal Misoprostol for Termination of Second-Trimester Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  G. Fitzmaurice,et al.  Cervical Preparation Before Dilation and Evacuation Using Adjunctive Misoprostol or Mifepristone Compared With Overnight Osmotic Dilators Alone: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  T. Shochet,et al.  A double‐blind randomized controlled trial of mifepristone or placebo before buccal misoprostol for abortion at 14–21 weeks of pregnancy , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[10]  N. Ngoc,et al.  Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol at 13–22 weeks: how long between the mifepristone and the misoprostol? , 2015 .

[11]  P. Blumenthal,et al.  Adjunct mifepristone for cervical preparation prior to dilation and evacuation: a randomized trial. , 2015, Contraception.

[12]  D. Grossman,et al.  Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion. , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  D. Constant,et al.  A randomized trial of misoprostol versus laminaria before dilation and evacuation in South Africa. , 2014, Contraception.

[14]  D. Doherty,et al.  Mifepristone and Oral, Vaginal, or Sublingual Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  O. Vragovic,et al.  Mifepristone and Misoprostol Compared With Osmotic Dilator Insertion Before Surgical Abortion at 15–18 Weeks , 2014 .

[16]  J. Steinauer,et al.  Buccal misoprostol plus laminaria for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 21-23 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. , 2014, Contraception.

[17]  C. Krajewski,et al.  Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks' gestation: SFP Guideline #2013-4. , 2014, Contraception.

[18]  J. Steinauer,et al.  Same-Day Synthetic Osmotic Dilators Compared With Overnight Laminaria Before Abortion at 14–18 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  T. Tongsong,et al.  Randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy between a vaginal misoprostol loading and non‐loading dose regimen for second‐trimester pregnancy termination , 2014, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[20]  R. Maurer,et al.  Buccal Misoprostol Compared With Synthetic Osmotic Cervical Dilator Before Surgical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  P. Blumenthal,et al.  Mifepristone–Misoprostol Dosing Interval and Effect on Induction Abortion Times: A Systematic Review , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  Practice Bulletin No. 135: Second-Trimester Abortion , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  D. Turok,et al.  Same-day cervical preparation with misoprostol prior to second trimester D&E: a case series. , 2011, Contraception.

[24]  J. Steinauer,et al.  Women's decision making regarding choice of second trimester termination method for pregnancy complications , 2012, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[25]  M. Y. Hou,et al.  Mifepristone vs. osmotic dilator insertion for cervical preparation prior to surgical abortion at 14-16 weeks: a randomized trial. , 2011, Contraception.

[26]  M. Ghajarzadeh,et al.  Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for second trimester termination: a randomized clinical trial , 2012, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[27]  N. Ngoc,et al.  Mifepristone and Misoprostol Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  N. Kapp,et al.  Clinical guidelines. Labor induction abortion in the second trimester. , 2011, Contraception.

[29]  N. Kapp,et al.  Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[30]  S. Newmann,et al.  Clinical guidelines. Cervical preparation for surgical abortion from 20 to 24 weeks' gestation. , 2008, Contraception.

[31]  P. Lohr,et al.  Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[32]  S. Lalitkumar,et al.  Second Trimester Medical Abortion with Mifepristone–Misoprostol and Misoprostol Alone: A Review of Methods and Management , 2008, Reproductive health matters.

[33]  P. Ho,et al.  Misoprostol: Pharmacokinetic profiles, effects on the uterus and side‐effects , 2007, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[34]  S. Lalitkumar,et al.  Mid-trimester induced abortion: a review. , 2007, Human reproduction update.

[35]  S. Bertisch,et al.  Misoprostol Administered by Epithelial Routes: Drug Absorption and Uterine Response , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  Ashlesha Patel,et al.  Adequacy and safety of buccal misoprostol for cervical preparation prior to termination of second-trimester pregnancy. , 2006, Contraception.

[37]  M. Goetsch,et al.  Cervical preparation using laminaria with adjunctive buccal misoprostol before second-trimester dilation and evacuation procedures: a randomized clinical trial. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[38]  A. Whitaker,et al.  Misoprostol Compared With Laminaria Before Early Second-Trimester Surgical Abortion: A Randomized Trial , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  P. Stubblefield,et al.  Methods for induced abortion. , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[40]  F. Chervenak,et al.  Dilation and evacuation at >or=20 weeks: comparison of operative techniques. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[41]  D. Grimes,et al.  Mifepristone and misoprostol versus dilation and evacuation for midtrimester abortion: a pilot randomised controlled trial , 2004, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[42]  R. Kirby,et al.  A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortion. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[43]  P. Ho,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol. , 2002, Human reproduction.

[44]  P. Darney,et al.  Misoprostol and pregnancy. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  A. Templeton,et al.  Nonsurgical mid‐trimester termination of pregnancy: a review of 500 consecutive cases , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[46]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Absorption Kinetics of Misoprostol With Oral or Vaginal Administration , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[47]  Berry Fn,et al.  Second-trimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation: an analysis of 11,747 cases. , 1983 .