Export Diversification and Ecological Footprint: A Comparative Study on EKC Theory among Korea, Japan, and China

This study examines the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis by adopting a country’s ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation in three East Asian countries: Japan, Korea, and China. During the development process, countries intend to balance between stabilizing export demand and maintaining sustainable economic improvement in the context of deteriorating global warming and climate change. The Environmental Kuznets Curve (henceforth, EKC) was originally developed to estimate the correlation between environment condition and economic development. In this paper, we started from the EKC model and adopted an Error Correction Methodology (henceforth, ECM) to estimate the EKC relationships in Japan, Korea (two developed countries), and China (a developing country) over the period of 1990 to 2013. Besides this, instead of only using Gross Domestic Product (henceforth, GDP), two subdivisions of trade diversification—export product diversification and export market diversification—are introduced as proxy variables for economic development in rectification of the EKC. The results demonstrate that both Korea and Japan satisfy the EKC theory by demonstrating an inverted U-shaped relationship between economic development and ecological footprint, while analysis based on data from China does not display the same tendency. For both export product diversification and market diversification, the more diversified the country’s export is, the bigger its ecological footprint. The policy implications of this econometric outcome are also discussed.

[1]  Export product diversification and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Turkey , 2016, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[2]  Panagiotis N. Fotis,et al.  The relationship between energy demand and real GDP growth rate: The role of price asymmetries and spatial externalities within 34 countries across the globe , 2017 .

[3]  Hongbo Liu,et al.  Ecological Footprint, Foreign Direct Investment, and Gross Domestic Production: Evidence of Belt & Road Initiative Countries , 2018, Sustainability.

[4]  O. Cadot,et al.  Trade Diversification, Income, and Growth: What Do We Know? , 2013 .

[5]  Ozlem Ozdemir,et al.  Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve , 2017 .

[6]  Raj Chetty,et al.  Sufficient Statistics for Welfare Analysis : A Bridge Between Structural and Reduced-Form Methods , 2009 .

[7]  K. Fonseca,et al.  Using root cause analysis and form redesign to reduce incorrect ordering of HIV tests. , 2012, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[8]  Duane Chapman,et al.  A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis , 1999 .

[9]  David I. Stern,et al.  Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur , 2001 .

[10]  T. Selden,et al.  International Trade Intensity and Carbon Emissions: A Cross-Country Econometric Analysis , 2001 .

[11]  J. V. Hoof,et al.  Application of Ecological Footprint Accounting as a Part of an Integrated Assessment of Environmental Carrying Capacity: A Case Study of the Footprint of Food of a Large City , 2018, Resources.

[12]  Romain Wacziarg,et al.  Stages of Diversification , 2000 .

[13]  G. Grossman,et al.  The inverted-U: what does it mean? , 1996, Environment and Development Economics.

[14]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development , 1996 .

[15]  D. Stern,et al.  Economic growth and particulate pollution concentrations in China , 2016 .

[16]  Haitao Zheng,et al.  China’s Carbon Footprint Based on Input-Output Table Series: 1992–2020 , 2017 .

[17]  O. Cadot,et al.  Export Diversification: What's behind the Hump? , 2007, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[18]  M. Getzner,et al.  Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy , 2003 .

[19]  E. Eltahir,et al.  North China Plain threatened by deadly heatwaves due to climate change and irrigation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[20]  Chi Ming Tam,et al.  EKC analysis for studying economic growth and environmental quality : a case study in China , 2009 .

[21]  Chien‐Chiang Lee,et al.  Does One Size Fit All? A Reexamination of the Environmental Kuznets Curve Using the Dynamic Panel Data Approach , 2009 .

[22]  Brantley Liddle.  What Are the Carbon Emissions Elasticities for Income and Population? Bridging STIRPAT and EKC via Robust Heterogeneous Panel Estimates , 2015 .

[23]  D. Stern.  The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve , 2004 .

[24]  D. Cochrane,et al.  A sampling study of the merits of autoregressive and reduced form transformation in regression analysis. , 1949, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[25]  G. Grossman,et al.  Economic Growth and the Environment , 1994 .

[26]  David I. Stern.  The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years , 2017 .

[27]  T. Selden,et al.  Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? , 1994 .

[28]  Junyi Shen,et al.  Environmental Kuznets Curve on Country Level: Evidence from China , 2004 .

[29]  O. Kwon,et al.  Sustainable growth and the environmental Kuznets curve , 2005 .