Best Practices Framework for Enabling High-Performing Virtual Engineering Teams

Engineering firms continue to adopt the practice of virtual teams, which face unique challenges and require additional management considerations than co-located teams. While virtual teams offer incentives in terms of flexibility and cost savings, engineering firms should be aware of added challenges that yield low-performing teams or result in failure. These challenges, in essence, are driven by the geographic dispersion of members, core reliance on communication technology, and composition of various cultures. The subject research follows a highly practical approach, providing specific practices for mitigation of the identified challenges. A survey study was conducted to gather data from engineering practitioners at a global professional services firm involved in virtual engineering projects between 2017 and 2018. Research conducted across best practices for virtual teams, coupled with the survey results, yielded a framework of five overarching themes to enable high-performing virtual engineering teams: technology integration, management of virtual resources, project governance controls, stakeholder engagement, and organizational drivers. Resulting practices are presented across the five themes of the framework. The findings should be leveraged by engineering and technology professionals involved in virtual projects, along with leaders and firm executives seeking improved performance of their virtual teams.

[1]  M. Knapp,et al.  Nonverbal communication in human interaction , 1972 .

[2]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams , 2004 .

[3]  Ita Richardson,et al.  Project Management within Virtual Software Teams , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE'06).

[4]  Fred Niederman,et al.  IT Project Managers' Perceptions and Use of Virtual Team Technologies , 2007 .

[5]  Vishag A. Badrinarayanan,et al.  Effective virtual new product development teams: an integrated framework , 2008 .

[6]  H. Ernst,et al.  How to manage virtual teams , 2009 .

[7]  Hui Liao,et al.  Getting Everyone on Board: The Role of Inspirational Leadership in Geographically Dispersed Teams , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Rui Huang,et al.  The contingent effects of leadership on team collaboration in virtual teams , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Organizing Global Product Development for Complex Engineered Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[10]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Hallowed Grounds: The Role of Cultural Values, Practices, and Institutions in TMS in an Offshored Complex Engineering Services Project , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Time Separation, Coordination, and Performance in Technical Teams , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[12]  Arilo Claudio Dias-Neto,et al.  An Industrial Experience on the Application of Distributed Testing in an Agile Software Development Environment , 2012, 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Global Software Engineering.

[13]  Ke-Wei Huang,et al.  Analyzing the Economies of Scale of Software as a Service Software Firms: A Stochastic Frontier Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  M. White The management of virtual teams and virtual meetings , 2014, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[15]  Sophia Z. Lee The State of the American Workplace , 2016 .

[16]  T. Daim,et al.  Exploring the communication breakdown in global virtual teams , 2017 .

[17]  Christof Ebert,et al.  50 Years of Software Engineering: Progress and Perils , 2018, IEEE Software.

[18]  Hedi BenAicha 2018 Annual Report , 2019 .

[19]  國合會系統管理者 2018 Annual Report , 2019 .