UAS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING WITH VELODYNE LiDAR SENSOR

Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) technology is nowadays willingly used in small area topographic mapping due to low costs and good quality of derived products. Since cameras typically used with UAS have some limitations, e.g. cannot penetrate the vegetation, LiDAR sensors are increasingly getting attention in UAS mapping. Sensor developments reached the point when their costs and size suit the UAS platform, though, LiDAR UAS is still an emerging technology. One issue related to using LiDAR sensors on UAS is the limited performance of the navigation sensors used on UAS platforms. Therefore, various hardware and software solutions are investigated to increase the quality of UAS LiDAR point clouds. This work analyses several aspects of the UAS LiDAR point cloud generation performance based on UAS flights conducted with the Velodyne laser scanner and cameras. The attention was primarily paid to the trajectory reconstruction performance that is essential for accurate point cloud georeferencing. Since the navigation sensors, especially Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs), may not be of sufficient performance, the estimated camera poses could allow to increase the robustness of the estimated trajectory, and subsequently, the accuracy of the point cloud. The accuracy of the final UAS LiDAR point cloud was evaluated on the basis of the generated DSM, including comparison with point clouds obtained from dense image matching. The results showed the need for more investigation on MEMS IMU sensors used for UAS trajectory reconstruction. The accuracy of the UAS LiDAR point cloud, though lower than for point cloud obtained from images, may be still sufficient for certain mapping applications where the optical imagery is not useful.

[1]  Bisheng Yang,et al.  Automatic registration of UAV-borne sequent images and LiDAR data , 2015 .

[2]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Rigorous approach to bore-sight self-calibration in airborne laser scanning , 2006 .

[3]  Yi Lin,et al.  Mini-UAV-Borne LIDAR for Fine-Scale Mapping , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[4]  R. Reulke,et al.  Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences , 2005 .

[5]  H. Michael Tulldahl,et al.  Lidar on small UAV for 3D mapping , 2014, Security and Defence.

[6]  Z. Li,et al.  The Design and Testing of a LiDAR Platform for a UAV for Heritage Mapping , 2015 .

[7]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Static Calibration and Analysis of the Velodyne HDL-64E S2 for High Accuracy Mobile Scanning , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[8]  Dimitrios Zekkos,et al.  Implementation of UAV localization methods for a mobile post-earthquake monitoring system , 2015, 2015 IEEE Workshop on Environmental, Energy, and Structural Monitoring Systems (EESMS) Proceedings.

[9]  Lucía Díaz-Vilariño,et al.  Lidar-equipped uav for building information modelling , 2014 .

[10]  NASER EL-SHEIMY Emerging MEMS IMU and Its Impact on Mapping Applications , 2009 .

[11]  C. Jekeli Inertial navigation systems with geodetic applications , 2000 .

[12]  Ryosuke Shibasaki,et al.  UAV-Borne 3-D Mapping System by Multisensor Integration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  C. Toth,et al.  Mapping with Small UAS: A Point Cloud Accuracy Assessment , 2015 .

[14]  Ursula Riegl,et al.  UAV-based laser scanning to meet special challenges in lidar surveying , 2015 .

[15]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Development of a UAV-LiDAR System with Application to Forest Inventory , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[16]  L. Kuhnert,et al.  LIGHT-WEIGHT SENSOR PACKAGE FOR PRECISION 3D MEASUREMENT WITH MICRO UAVs E.G. POWER-LINE MONITORING , 2013 .

[17]  Gottfried Mandlburger,et al.  Complementing airborne laser bathymetry with UAV-based lidar for capturing alluvial landscapes , 2015, SPIE Remote Sensing.